What could they put in the COVID vaccine?

Tiny, tiny biosensors?

From lexico.com: nanotechnology: “The branch of technology that deals with dimensions and tolerances of less than 100 nanometers, especially the manipulation of individual atoms and molecules.”

by Jon Rappoport

October 7, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

We begin with excerpts from an important article at Children’s Health Defense, “Microchips, Nanotechnology and Implanted Biosensors: The New Normal?” by Pam Long. [1]

Buckle up.

“U.S. military personnel will be the first subjects in nanotechnology trials in the pursuit of optimizing health and early detection of disease outbreaks. Profusa has research contracts for bio-integrated sensors with the U.S. Department of Defense and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), pending U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in early 2021.”

“Profusa’s promotional video shows how the bio-integrated sensor enables a soldier to be tracked by remote computers using GPS in addition to monitoring real-time biomarkers, such as oxygen levels and heart rate. While this biotechnology is portrayed as potentially lifesaving to a soldier on the battlefield, the implications of GPS tracking individuals is a terrifying step towards a surveillance state in the general population. Furthermore, tracking people in stages of sickness can only result in medical tyranny in the hands of any government. The Profusa influenza study requires patients to wear the wearable version of the reader 24 hours a day, with continuous biomarker information collection into a database, and aims to detect four stages of infection: healthy, infected, asymptomatic and recovery stage. These unreliable detection stages could become the criteria for different levels of individual participation in society as experienced in the unsustainable COVID-19 state-level lockdowns for the masses.”

“This Profusa nanotechnology has three components: an inserted [implanted] sensor called hydrogel, a light-emitting fluorescent sensor reader on the surface of the skin and an electronic software component that transmits to an online database…and there is no information on how the technology could be removed, if at all. ‘Tiny biosensors that become one with the body’ could imply a lifetime commitment.”

So…implanted nano-bio sensors. Could this be taken a step further? Instead of placing the sensors just under the surface of the skin, could they be injected with a vaccine?

Are researchers interested in marrying nanotechnology and vaccines?

Here is a quote from Frontiers in Immunology, 24 January, 2019, “Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines Against Respiratory Viruses” [2]: A new generation of vaccines based on nanoparticles has shown great potential to address most of the limitations of conventional and subunit vaccines. This is due to recent advances in chemical and biological engineering, which allow the design of nanoparticles with a precise control over the size, shape, functionality and surface properties, leading to enhanced antigen presentation and strong immunogenicity. This short review provides an overview of the advantages associated with the use of nanoparticles as vaccine delivery platforms to immunize against respiratory viruses…” [such as the purported COVID-19 virus?]

Here is another quote, also from Frontiers in Immunology, October 4, 2018, “Nanoparticle Vaccines Against Infectious Diseases” [3]: In the last several years, the use of nanoparticle-based vaccines has received a great attention to improve vaccine efficacy, immunization strategies, and targeted delivery to achieve desired immune responses at the cellular level…Nanocarriers composed of lipids, proteins, metals or polymers have already been used…This review article focuses on the applications of nanocarrier-based vaccine formulations and the strategies used for the functionalization of nanoparticles to accomplish efficient delivery of vaccines in order to induce desired host immunity against infectious diseases.”

There can be no doubt that nanotechnology is, indeed, very much involved in cutting-edge vaccine research.

Here are astonishing quotes from the journal Nano Today, from a 2019 paper titled: “Nanowire probes could drive high-resolution brain-machine interfaces.” [4] Its authors are Chinese and American:

“…advances can enable investigations of dynamics in the brain [through nano-sensor-implants] and drive the development of new brain-machine interfaces with unprecedented resolution and precision.”

“…output electrical signals of brain activity or input electrical stimuli to modulate brain activity in concert with external machines, including computer processors and prosthetics, for human enhancement…”

Aside from research into prosthetics and, perhaps, the reversal of certain paralyses, this avenue of investigation also suggests “modulation” of the brain remotely connected to machines, for the purpose of control.

Modulation…such as control of basic thought-impulses, sensations, emotions?

ONE: Nano-sensors, implanted in the body and brain, would issue real time data-reports on body/brain functioning to ops centers.

TWO: And from those ops centers, data—including instructions—would be sent back to the nano-sensors, which would impose those instructions on the brain and body.

If this seems impossible, consider nanotech research aimed at improving the use of prosthetics. In that field, imposing instructions on the body/brain appears to be the whole point.

The question is: how far along the road of development is this technology? I can only say we are seeing the public published face of nanotech. What lies behind it, in secret research, is a matter for estimation and speculation.

I offer one speculation: the “promotion” of the social agenda of collectivist thought, through nanotech. Utilizing the Internet of Things, an attempt would be made to hook up and “harmonize” many, many brains with one another. Same basic feelings, same impulses—shared.

Who would be interested in such a program? Think Chinese government, DARPA (the technology arm of the Pentagon), and numerous other international actors. Think Rockefeller medical researchers. Think technocracy and Brave New World.

But wait. Suppose untold numbers of nanoparticles are ALREADY in traditional vaccines? And suppose we have no idea how they got there? Or whether they are “only” dangerous contaminants that could affect human health in many damaging ways…or are some of them ALSO nanosensors that can receive and transmit information? Do these contaminating nanoparticles represent an earlier stage of research in implantation of vaccine-nanos into humans?

A 2017 study of 44 types of 15 traditional vaccines, manufactured by leading global companies, has uncovered a very troubling and previously unreported fact:

The vaccines are heavily contaminated with a variety of nanoparticles.

Many of the particles are metals.

We’re talking about traditional vaccines, such as HPV, flu, Swine Flu, Hepatitis B, MMR, DPT, tetanus, etc.

To begin to understand some of the destructive effects of contaminating nanoparticles in vaccines, here is the groundbreaking 2017 study: [5]

International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination
Volume 4 Issue 1
January 23 2017
New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines:
Micro- and Nanocontamination
Antonietta M Gatti and Stefano Montanari

“The analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case. This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines…”

Are the study authors leaving the door open to the possibility that the contamination is intentional?

“The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that toxicity…they induce an inflammatory reaction.”

“After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas…But they can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination…As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect…due to a nano-bio-interaction…can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way…It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA…”

“In some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues…”

“Given the contaminations we observed in all samples of human-use vaccines, adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and credible and have the character of randomness, since they depend on where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation. It is only obvious that similar quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more serious impact on very small organisms like those of children. Their presence in the muscles…could heavily impair the muscle functionality…”

“We come across particles with chemical compositions, similar to those found in the vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of environmental contamination caused by different pollution sources. In most circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they have no technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like the result of the random formation occurring, for example, when waste is burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular those meant for infants.”

This 2017 study opens up a whole new field: the investigation of nanoparticles in vaccines where none were expected.

Such particles are not medicine in any sense of the word.

Many legal and scientific “experts” assert the State has a right to mandate vaccines and force them on the population. But these contaminating nanoparticles are not vaccines or medicines. Only a lunatic would defend the right of the State to inject them.

Here is another section from the 2017 study. Trade names of vaccines, and compositions of the nanoparticle contaminants are indicated.

“…further presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases [all 44 vaccines], whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product…”

“…single particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (<100nm) and aggregates…debris of Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium and Titanium; of Iron, Chromium, Silicon and Calcium particles…arranged in a cluster, and Aluminum-Copper debris…in an aggregate.”

“…the particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all the samples analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec, Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro).”

“…particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride).”

“…singular debris found in Repevax (Silicon, Gold, Silver) and Gardasil (Zirconium).”

“Some metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were also identified. Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and Aluminum (Vivotif, Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix, Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec); Gold or Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron, Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1) were also found. The only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in 25/44. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a nano-bio-interaction…occurs and a ‘protein corona’ is formed…The nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body.”

“…examples of these nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen (stable composite entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec… of stainless steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel…) and of Copper, Zinc and Lead in Cervarix…Similar aggregates, though in different situations (patients suffering from leukemia or cryoglobulinemia), have already been described in literature.”


I’m sure you’ve read official assurances that vaccine-manufacturing problems are “rare.” You can file those pronouncements along with other medical lies.

“I’d like the heavy metal sandwich on rye, please. And instead of serving it on a plate, can you inject it?”

—It’s obvious from what I’ve written so far in this article that research and development of nanoparticles as vaccine components is far along. And while much of what is already in the vaccines may be nano-contamination, there has also been a very strong push to refine the research—INSERT NANO SENSORS IN THE BODY AND BRAIN THAT WOULD RECEIVE AND TRANSMIT INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS.

Just to give you an idea of how important nanoparticles-in-vaccines is to the pharmaceutical establishment, here is what happened to the two Italian researchers who uncovered the presence of nanos in traditional vaccines, the authors of the study I quoted from above:

James Grundvig, at GreenMedInfo.com and the World Mercury Project, reported (3/7/18): [6]

“Last week, the Italian police raided the home and science laboratory of Drs. Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Montanari. The police snatched all of the digital assets owned by the husband and wife team of nanopathologists, grabbing laptops, computers, and flash-drives—and with it, years of work and research.”

“Because Gatti and Montanari had taken their research of nanodust and nanoparticles…to what unseen contamination might reside in vaccines in 2016, they came under the microscope of the United States, European, and Italian authorities. They had touched the third rail of medicine. They had crossed the no-go zone with the purported crime being scientific research and discovery. By finding nano-contamination in random vaccines, Gatti and Montanari revealed, for the first time, what no one knew: Vaccines had more than aluminum salts adjuvants, Polysorbate-80, and other inorganic chemicals in them, they also harbored stainless steel, tungsten, copper, and other metals and rare elements that don’t belong in shots given to fetuses, pregnant women, newborns, babies and toddlers developing their lungs, immune and nervous systems.”

“When the scientists published their findings in January 2017, “New Quality‐Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro‐ and Nanocontamination,” the logical next step for the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) should have been to open an investigation into their claims, hire independent scientists to run their own lab tests to confirm or refute the findings. If confirmed, then the healthcare agencies would enact new policies on safety of the vaccine supply chain, and enforce strict quality control and quality assurance programs.”

“But none of that happened. A year went by. It was cheaper for the authorities to attack the Italian scientists than upset the vaccine gravy train that supports the politicians.”


Now, it appears we are on the cusp of an approval for one vaccine, the COVID shot, to be certified for injection into every person in the world.

What better opportunity for implanting nanotech particles in humans?

Here is just one example:

New England Journal of Medicine, September 2, 2020; “Phase 1–2 Trial of a SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Spike Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine.” [7]

“rSARS-CoV-2, developed by Novavax and manufactured at Emergent Biosolutions, is a recombinant nanoparticle vaccine constructed from the full-length (i.e., including the transmembrane domain), wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein…”

“We initiated a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1–2 trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the rSARS-CoV-2 vaccine (in 5-μg and 25-μg doses, with or without Matrix-M1 adjuvant, and with observers unaware of trial-group assignments) in 131 healthy adults. In phase 1, vaccination comprised two intramuscular injections, 21 days apart…”

It’s happening. It’s in progress.

What is on the horizon? Through the use of implanted nanosenors that can receive instructions, the enactment of an agenda of collectivist thought. An attempt would be made to hook up and “harmonize” many, many brains with one another. Same basic feelings, same impulses—shared…

Who would be interested in such a program? Think Chinese government, DARPA (the technology arm of the Pentagon), and numerous other international actors. Think Rockefeller medical researchers. Think technocracy and Brave New World.


SOURCES:

[1] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/military-vaccines/microchips-nanotechnology-and-implanted-biosensors-the-new-normal/

[2] https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00022/full

[3] https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02224/full

[4] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1748013219306929

[5] https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/new-quality-control-investigations-on-vaccines-micro–and-nanocontamination.html

[6] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-third-digital-revolution-to-unleash-the-power-of-anti-censorship/

[7] https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2026920


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

26 comments on “What could they put in the COVID vaccine?

  1. The Watchman says:

    Jon, I linked that article on Sunday 9/04/20 @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
    Thanks for sharing with your readers as I am sure you have more than my site does; and it’s an excellent article that everyone needs to be aware of!! Keep up the great work!!!!

  2. Paul says:

    “Buckle up.”
    (I always do Jon, to withstand the Cyclone of Info.)

    “Are researchers interested in marrying nanotechnology and vaccines?”

    As to “researchers”…& their interests…& their willingness to pursue said interests…

    Many moons ago, when a psychology student, a professor showed us a film depicting thus:

    A white-coat-clad “researcher” was squirting an excessive amount of very dark dye directly into the eyes of baby rabbits.

    He would then MOST CASUALLY, RHYTHMICALLY, & WITHOUT ANY CONCERN, toss the little (now dirtied) rabbit into a roughened wooden bin.

    It should be noted, that this film had AUDIO, & I almost came out of my skin, in class, in my young 20’s, as I watched this horror show and could HEAR the bleating tortured cries of the now-unnecessary-pained bunnies.

    The “researcher” was nonplussed.

    The film ended with a bird’s-eye view into the bin, imaging a large disorganized mound of writhing stained blinded white rabbits.

    They were testing mascara.

    I can’t Imagine
    what these types
    MIGHT BE CAPABLE
    OF…
    “Searching For.”

  3. Butch says:

    And here I thought the Borg were just Star Trek science-fiction. People, take NO vaccines they are ALL detrimental to your health and far from safe, even farther from effective. Try nutrition, it’s an amazing thing.

  4. BDBinc says:

    Its technology in the service of madness.
    Consensus political $cience (science that has been mutated and is void of science =its now pure political garbage) courtesy of Herr Rockerfellers “man made climate change” movement (and the collective unconscious/hive mind).

    No reasoning or rational thinking is applied.

    Though they don’t know if having antibodies means you are immune or infected (they say immune) so why do they not ever test vaccinated for antibodies right after vaccinations for proof of efficacy ?
    There is no proof what so ever of efficacy let alone safety of vaccines.
    Vaccines( medical practice of injecting toxins straight into blood ) could even be the cause of the growing numbers with autoimmune diseases and the immune compromised .

    • Sue says:

      Vaccines are not just “could even be the cause of the growing numbers with autoimmune diseases and immune compromised.”

      They ARE the major cause of autoimmune diseases of all descriptions, and damage to immune systems.

      From those first injections of cow pus and horse grease, right up through the vivisectors’ latest tinkering with RNA and nanoparticles – behind the curtain of enthusiastic media P.R. and brainwashing, enormous damage has been wrought.

  5. Amanda says:

    NYU Professor @mcrispinmiller cites Denis Rancourt’s scientific article on #MasksDontWork to his class. Admin intervenes to all his students to protect the #COVID19 campaign. Read the story here:

    https://markcrispinmiller.com/2020/10/nyu-must-affirm-mcms-academic-freedom-petition/

    On Sept. 20, after a class discussion of the case for universal masking as defense against transmission of SARS-COV-2 (in which discussion she did not participate), a student took to Twitter to express her fury that Prof. Miller had brought up the randomized, controlled tests—all of those so far conducted on the subject—finding that masks and ventilators are ineffective at preventing such transmission, because the COVID-19 virions are too small for such expedients to block them. Prof. Miller urged the students to read those studies, as well as others that purport to show the opposite, with due attention to the scientific reviews thereof, and possible financial links between the researchers conducting them, and such interests as Big Pharma and the Gates Foundation. Prof. Miller followed up by providing the links to the former studies (not easily found on Google, though they have all appeared in reputable medical journals), and other materials, including a video of a debate on the subject.

    The student was so outraged by Prof. Miller even mentioning those studies that she called on NYU to fire him

    And he was teaching a class on propaganda when this happened. Please go to the link and sign the petition protecting academic freedom:

    https://markcrispinmiller.com/2020/10/nyu-must-affirm-mcms-academic-freedom-petition/

    please copy and share!

    • Steven Fecser says:

      NYU seems to be a sanctuary for leftwing liberal lunacy. Michael Rectenwald, a former NYU prof exposed the ideological intolerance and viciousness of both faculty and student in his book BEYOND WOKE which I just finished reading. It’s truly a shame academia has become stained with virtue signaling SJW’s
      who even have a bias reporting department, safe spaces and the need for trigger warnings. Good God! What has happened to higher education?

      Thankfully I attended college in the early 70’s.

      If this shit happend in my day, I’d punch them all in the mouth.

  6. Larry C says:

    And lest we forget: the recipe calls for a wee dram of Shark Oil as an adjudavent to make it more “palatable”.

    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/10/07/how-many-sharks-die-for-squalene.aspx

  7. Larry C says:

    “The Profusa influenza study requires patients to wear the wearable version of the reader 24 hours a day, with continuous biomarker information collection into a database, and aims to detect four stages of infection: healthy, infected, asymptomatic and recovery stage.”

    They’ve conveniently ignored what is quite likely the deadliest vector, and that is of course VACCINATIONS.

  8. futuret says:

    OUR ETERNAL SALVATION DEPENDS UPON REFUSING ANY VACCINES AT THIS POINT, EVEN IF IT MEANS OUR DEATH NOT TO ACCEPT ANY VACCINES. HERE IS WHY:::

    https://bennettleeross.com/science/the-corona-vaccine-is-the-mark-of-the-beast/

  9. Larry C says:

    ““…single particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (<100nm) and aggregates…debris of Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium and Titanium; of Iron, Chromium, Silicon and Calcium particles…arranged in a cluster, and Aluminum-Copper debris…in an aggregate.”"

    If I'm not mistaken, spectrum analysis taken a!most two decades ago revealed highly reflective particles of aluminum, barium and magnesium in Persistent Aerosol Contrails (AKA Chemtrails). Whatever the purpose behind the Chemtrail Program, it was necessary to continuously spray because all of that finely milled particulate eventually floats to the ground where we useless eaters are running around inhaling that next breath of delicious air.

    It seems that "they" are STILL spraying our skies…

  10. ken says:

    Humans,,, always trying to discover new and better ways of killing each other. Why? Just because.

  11. Paul says:

    “But wait.
    Suppose untold numbers of nanoparticles are ALREADY in traditional vaccines?
    And suppose we have no idea how they got there?
    Or whether they are “only” dangerous contaminants that could affect human health in many damaging ways…or are some of them ALSO nanosensors that can [receive] and transmit…”

    [emphasis mine]

    Hmmm…

    Seems to me you’ve offered a possible explanation for vaccine-induced autism.

    Can the child be “closing himself off” from his surrounding social environment, due to majorly enhanced (gone wrong, that is) “electro-mechanical induced RECEIVING?”

  12. Amanda says:

    Please copy and share!!

    RFK Jr-

    New CDC date show that Coronavirus mortality rates are now well below those for a seasonal flu. Seasonal flu infection/mortality rates (IFR) according to Tony Fauci are .1% (NEJM). CDC’s latest dat show the COVID IFR for Americans in 0-19 age group is 0.003% and in the 19-49 age group 0.02 %. Combining 0-49 year olds, which represent 64% of US population, the IFR is 0.01% which means flu is 10x as lethal as COVID. This number is 1/50th the predicted death rates predicted by modeling funded by Bill Gates that Dr. Fauci cited to justify the lockdowns. These new data raise three crucial questions:

    1 If COVID -19 is less deadly than seasonal flu, can we continue to justify totalitarian countermeasures?

    2. Is there any point in waiting around for fast tracked, zero liability vaccines with high risk profiles and meager efficacy?

    3. Do pandemics disappear when mortalities cease or when it’s no longer in CNN’s interest to frighten and shame people?

  13. bleak says:

    “He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.”
    ~ Revelation 22:10

    “For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.”
    ~ Revelation 22:15

    There’s a lot to be said for the book of Revelation and prophecy. Is the “vaccine” apocalypse inevitable? I think so. For them, not for me. I mean, I won’t get the “vaccine” and so I may suffer and eventually die from starvation or something. I’m older and sometimes it’s enough to know that it won’t last forever.

    The ‘believers’ will eventually die too. The sorcerers will also die.

    “But ignorance of the Father brought terror and fear, and terror grew dense like a fog, so that no one could see.”
    ~ The Gospel of Truth, Nag Hammadi Scriptures

    The insanity is thick like a fog. Yesterday, I braved it up to go grocery shopping. Masks masks masks on children still in carriages??? I wanted to confront their parents. I wanted to show them the truth. But I know it’s hopeless. If they’ve got cartoon masks on their kids, they are steeply entrenched in it. They walk around as if nothing is wrong. Just another day at Traitor Joe’s doing their errands etc. “Oh yes, this is for the ‘greater good’ isn’t it. We are all proud Americans.”

    I question some or bring up the topic. Usually, it comes out something like, “So what do you think of this “virus” thing? Do you believe what they’re telling you?” Mostly apathetic and ignorant responses. It’s just sad. I think I’ll let them be still.

    If you’re bored and want to take a ride based on prophecy, try Gematria. It makes Q seem like the Mickey Mouse Club of conspiracy theorists that it really is.

    “Exposing the Global “Revelation” Agenda”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPTwuhGf5uo

    “Donald and Melania Get Covid – By the Numbers”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shyPM1jrlNg

    The Germatrinator
    http://www.gematrinator.com/index.php

  14. Paul says:

    “I offer one speculation: the “promotion” of the social agenda of collectivist thought, through nanotech.

    Same basic feelings, same impulses—shared.”


    I think we might already be there.

    I feel I got up one morning, and lo…

    -There were 23 genders.
    -BLM’s agenda seemed to have infiltrated & was being acted upon (without any meaningful discussion) by local authorities.
    -“Defunding The Police” IN AREAS OF OVERT VIOLENCE.
    -Shutting down small/midsize businesses, then wondering why there was no more bacon at the grocery store.
    -Most people branded as racist.
    -“Empathy” had become THE most important quality in a Prez.

    It seems like a WAVE OF ABSURDITY has taken hold.

    & One last thing, is the MI Governor’s face made of plastic?

    What happened to the concordance of human meaning coupled to human expression?

    Ahh…no biggie…It’s probably the camera angle coupled with my aging eyesight.

    No matter.

  15. STACKS says:

    What are the chances that this nano-technology was already deployed via high altitude aerosols years ago? Is vaccine delivery even necessary?

    What if they’re already swimming inside most of the population?

  16. Pft says:

    Depopulation of those with little economic value (old, sick, feeble minded) . Technocratic Enslavement of those left that have economic value . They will be turned into a social impact bond that is traded on the human capital market . They will be monitored on the internet of bodies where every action is assigned a social impact value and recorded on blockchain which will determine the value of the bond and determine his current value and predict future earnings for the bond owner. If calculation or prediction of current and future value is zero or negative (costs to maintain exceed productive value) the human bond may be terminated and losses written off by the bond owner to offset tax obligations

  17. Deborah L Purdom says:

    “ Profusa’s promotional video shows how the bio-integrated sensor enables a soldier to be tracked by remote computers using GPS in addition to monitoring real-time biomarkers, such as oxygen levels and heart rate. While this biotechnology is portrayed as potentially lifesaving to a soldier on the battlefield, the implications of GPS tracking individuals is a terrifying step towards a surveillance state in the general population. Furthermore, tracking people in stages of sickness can only result in medical tyranny in the hands of any government. The Profusa influenza study requires patients to wear the wearable version of the reader 24 hours a day, with continuous biomarker information collection into a database, and aims to detect four stages of infection: healthy, infected, asymptomatic and recovery stage. These unreliable detection stages could become the criteria for different levels of individual participation in society as experienced in the unsustainable COVID-19 state-level lockdowns for the masses.”

    So if we can track our soldiers via GPS, why couldn’t the enemy as well?

  18. Sean says:

    Administrative Process, Conditional Acceptance, I will take your nana vac if you take it and if I or my family get sick or die then you personally are held responsible and x amount is due immediately.

    I like Michael Badnariks, libertarian presidential candidates answer to this question after a presidential rally back in the day, You bring your needle and I will bring my 45. And we will see who can make the biggest hole. He is also quoted saying that the purpose of 2nd Amendment is there in case the 1st Amendment fails.

  19. Mac says:

    The several difficulties are nano tech being invisible to the eye, and nano that ‘senses’ can obviously can be designed to do more so we wouldn’t know exactly what it’s doing. The fact is a lot of tech has been built that’s more obvious for instance even without nano we’re full of minerals – metals and they probably can already track where people generally are, by satellite or drone by heat sensing I think it was. Remember seeing that about decade ago. In any case this nano may be more individualized or so would seem. Have to say it’s a shame nano seems headed in negative direction because it could have many interesting applications.
    And it’s odd, always assumed insiders would have access to whatever came along but it doesn’t seem so, or why do they let famous types or insider puppets die. They’ve had nano a long time, so who knows what the agendas are. Half of this could be distraction to make off with more trillions as people look other directions.

  20. jeffers says:

    They’re probably just experimenting, and how do you stop them from making things. We could be as concerned about gmos and glycosphate since there is so much land held by corporations and tied to Monsatan. Maybe we could make their frankencorn turn on them.

  21. Walking Dead says:

    I offer one speculation: the “promotion” of the social agenda of collectivist thought, through nanotech. Utilizing the Internet of Things, an attempt would be made to hook up and “harmonize” many, many brains with one another. Same basic feelings, same impulses—shared.

    I thinks we are already there. It explains the stupidity of all those that have taken some of these shots for the flu, or whatever disease the powers to be come up with. Common sense has left them.

  22. Jock says:

    Would be interesting to compare the particles found in the vaccine with the particles/ materials used in the manufacture of the nano-chips.

  23. Paul says:

    U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez closely watched the VP debate & was irked by VP Pence using her nickname “AOC.”

    “For the record @Mike_Pence, it’s Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez to you.”

    VP Pence’s alter-ego responded:

    “A-OK AOC.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *