COVID diagnostic test: worst test ever devised?

by Jon Rappoport

September 10, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

The need for the COVID test is being hyped to the skies. More tests automatically create more case numbers. This allows heads of state and national governments to whipsaw the public:

“We were re-opening the economy, but now, with the escalating case numbers, we’ll have to impose lockdowns again…”

This wreaks more havoc and economic destruction, which is the true goal of the COVID operation. Its cruelty is boundless.

In this article, I present quotes from official sources about their own diagnostic test for the coronavirus, the PCR.

Spoiler alert: the admitted holes and shortcomings of the test are devastating.

From “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” [1]:

“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”

Translation: A positive test doesn’t guarantee that the COVID virus is causing infection at all. And, ahem, reading between the lines, maybe the COVID virus might not be in the patient’s body at all, either.

From the World Health Organization (WHO): “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans” [2]:

“Several assays that detect the 2019-nCoV have been and are currently under development, both in-house and commercially. Some assays may detect only the novel virus [COVID] and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are genetically similar.”

Translation: Some PCR tests register positive for types of coronavirus that have nothing to do with COVID—including plain old coronas that cause nothing more than a cold.

The WHO document adds this little piece: “Protocol use limitations: Optional clinical specimens for testing has [have] not yet been validated.”

Translation: We’re not sure which tissue samples to take from the patient, in order for the test to have any validity.


“…The SARS-CoV-2RNA [COVID virus] is generally detectable in respiratory specimens during the acute phase of infection. Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status…THE AGENT DETECTED MAY NOT BE THE DEFINITE CAUSE OF DISEASE (CAPS are mine). Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”

Translation: On the one hand, we claim the test can “generally” detect the presence of the COVID virus in a patient. But we admit that “the agent detected” on the test, by which we mean COVID virus, “may not be the definite cause of disease.” We also admit that, unless the patient has an acute infection, we can’t find COVID. Therefore, the idea of “asymptomatic patients” confirmed by the test is nonsense. And even though a positive test for COVID may not indicate the actual cause of disease, all positive tests must be reported—and they will be counted as “COVID cases.” Regardless.

From a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, “SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit” [4]:

“Regulatory status: For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.”

Translation: Don’t use the test result alone to diagnose infection or disease. Oops.

“non-specific interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3, type 7), Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia Pneumoniae, etc.”

Translation: Although this company states the test can detect COVID, it also states the test can read FALSELY positive if the patient has one of a number of other irrelevant viruses in his body. What is the test proving, then? Who knows? Flip a coin.

“Application Qualitative”

Translation: This clearly means the test is not suited to detect how much virus is in the patient’s body. I’ll cover how important this admission is in a minute.

“The detection result of this product is only for clinical reference, and it should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The clinical management of patients should be considered in combination with their symptoms/signs, history, other laboratory tests and treatment responses. The detection results should not be directly used as the evidence for clinical diagnosis, and are only for the reference of clinicians.”

Translation: Don’t use the test as the exclusive basis for diagnosing a person with COVID. And yet, this is exactly what health authorities are doing all over the world. All positive tests must be reported to government agencies, and they are counted as COVID cases.

Those quotes, from official government and testing sources, torpedo the whole “scientific” basis of the test.

And now, I’ll add another lethal blow: the test has never been validated properly as an instrument to detect disease. Even if we blindly assumed it can detect the presence of the COVID virus in a patient, it doesn’t show HOW MUCH virus is in the body. And that is key, because in order to even begin talking about actual illness in the real world, not in a lab, the patient would need to have millions and millions of the virus actively replicating in his body.

Proponents of the test assert that it CAN measure how much virus is in the body. To which I reply: prove it.

Prove it in a way it should have been proved decades ago—but never was.

Take five hundred people and remove tissue samples from them. The people who take the samples do NOT do the test. The testers will never know who the patients are and what condition they’re in.

The testers run their PCR on the tissue samples. In each case, they say which virus they found and HOW MUCH of it they found.

“All right, in patients 24, 46, 65, 76, 87, and 93 we found a great deal of virus.”

Now we un-blind those patients. They should all be sick, because they have so much virus replicating in their bodies. Are they sick? Are they running marathons? Let’s find out.

This OBVIOUS vetting of the test has never been done. That is an enormous scandal. Where are the controlled test results in 500 patients, a thousand patients? Nowhere.

The PCR is an unproven fraud.

“But…but…what about all the sick and dying people…why are they sick?”

I’ve written thousands of words answering that question, in past articles. A NUMBER of conditions—none involving COVID, and most involving old traditional diseases—are making people sick.

There are other large-scale studies of the PCR test that have never been done. I’ve covered them in detail, in prior articles. To summarize: a study using a thousand patients, in which their tissue samples are sent to 30 different labs for analysis and verdicts, to see whether the results are uniform from lab to lab; and a study of 1000 patients, in which the results are compared with the results of analysis by electron microcopy. These large studies—never done.

In other words, the PCR test has never been adequately tested; it has never been properly validated as a diagnostic tool.

Here, from Canadian researcher David Crowe’s bombshell paper, FLAWS IN CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC THEORY, is a key quote about the PCR test [5]:

“A review of 33 RT-PCR tests for COVID-19 approved under US FDA Emergency Use Authorizations showed a wide range of differences in what the tests were looking for and how they decided whether they had found it. The tests look for a variety of different segments (‘genes’) of the presumed COVID-19 genome, that only amounts to about 1% or less of the total genome, which is about 30,000 bases. Perhaps the worst feature of the tests is how they decide whether the sample is positive if more than one [‘gene’] segment is being looked for. Some tests look for only one, so it must be present for a positive. But tests that look for two segments are split between those that require both to be present and those that require either one for a positive. Some tests look for three segments but only require any two to be present, while one test insisted on all three. Tests that allow a segment to be undetected raise the question of how it can be said that a virus was detected when an important part of it was missing.”

If the PCR is a uniform standardized test, a rabbit is a spaceship.

Speaking of lack of uniformity in test results, here is a quote from Stephen Bustin, who is considered one of the foremost experts on PCR in the world. The excerpt is from his 2017 article, “Talking the talk, but not walking the walk: RT-qPCR as a paradigm for the lack of reproducibility in molecular research” [6]:

“Awareness of variability problems associated with PCR has been long-standing, with the first report describing inconsistencies with replicate and serial specimens evaluated within and between laboratories as early as 1992. The lack of a theoretical understanding of the dynamic processes involved in PCR, especially with respect to the amplification of nonreproducible and/or unexpected amplification products, was also highlighted decades ago. These observations and the resulting implications are largely disregarded.”

Here is the story of an epic failure of the PCR, right out in the open, for all to see. The reference is the NY Times, January 22, 2007, “Faith in Quick Tests Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.” [7]

“Dr. Brooke Herndon, an internist at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, could not stop coughing…By late April, other health care workers at the hospital were coughing…”

“For months, nearly everyone involved thought the medical center had had a huge whooping cough outbreak, with extensive ramifications. Nearly 1,000 health care workers at the hospital in Lebanon, N.H., were given a preliminary test and furloughed from work until their results were in; 142 people, including Dr. Herndon, were told they appeared to have the disease; and thousands were given antibiotics and a vaccine for protection. Hospital beds were taken out of commission, including some in intensive care.”

“Then, about eight months later, health care workers were dumbfounded to receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm.”

“Now, as they look back on the episode, epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists say the problem was that they placed too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test [PCR] that led them astray.”

“There are no national data on pseudo-epidemics caused by an overreliance on such molecular tests, said Dr. Trish M. Perl, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins and past president of the Society of Health Care Epidemiologists of America. But, she said, pseudo-epidemics happen all the time. The Dartmouth case may have been one of the largest, but it was by no means an exception, she said.”

“Many of the new molecular [PCR] tests are quick but technically demanding, and each laboratory may do them in its own way. These tests, called ‘home brews,’ are not commercially available, and there are no good estimates of their error rates. But their very sensitivity makes false positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested, as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.”

“’You’re in a little bit of no man’s land,’ with the new molecular [PCR] tests, said Dr. Mark Perkins, an infectious disease specialist and chief scientific officer at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, a nonprofit foundation supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. ‘All bets are off on exact performance’.”

“With pertussis, she [Dr. Kretsinger, CDC] said, ‘there are probably 100 different P.C.R. protocols and methods being used throughout the country,’ and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate. ‘We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of P.C.R.-positive results, the disease was not pertussis,’ Dr. Kretsinger added.”

“Dr. Cathy A. Petti, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Utah, said the story had one clear lesson.”

“’The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives,’ Dr. Petti said. ‘No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R’.”

There is more to report about the PCR test, and I have, but I’ll make this final point for now: I’ve presented, over the last several months, compelling evidence that no one proved the existence of the COVID virus, by proper scientific procedures, in the first place. So the PCR test would be looking for…what? A virus that isn’t there?

And on the back of this test, governments are wrecking economies all over the world, and untold numbers of human lives.




note: said document above (archived at was on the following page…

…however, that page now redirects to…

…and that new page does not have said document

see also,…






The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

52 comments on “COVID diagnostic test: worst test ever devised?

  1. michael godfrey MD says:

    Brilliant detective work, Jon. The problem is how to get these truths to the politicians that are deciding on what they desperately need to do to stop the perceived pandemic. At the same time, their appointed advisory experts are persistently telling them that must not relax their restrictions or there will be new waves of infections and deaths. The more aware MDs and other health professionals are so far finding it almost impossible to get access to these politicians. However, we are working on it down here in NZ and Australia.
    Keep breathing – they say its good for health!

    • Maverick says:

      The politicians already know, they are complicit in this. i am sure they are getting juicy rewards.

    • Deuce says:

      It’s terrible. It’s like painting with a blowtorch. It’s just the wrong tool entirely. Jon is spot on about PCR not being a viable way to determine viral load. Nor is it, or anything else, a viable test for detecting a virus whose genetic sequence has never even been verified. I wish he would have stopped there. But regrettably he dives headfirst into another tsunami of confirmation bias to the point of telling you flat out lies that will do more harm than good should you believe them. PCR works. Amazingly. So much so that it won the Nobel Prize. Since 2001 a company called Genomic Health has run a PCR based assay that detects gene expression in breast colon and prostate tissues that can identify cancers, their specific node type, and the most effective course of treatment based on the first two factors. Genomic Health runs about 100,000 of these tests a year and has done so for the better part of 2 decades. In 2011 the Cleveland Clinic did an independent retrospective study of their results against patient outcomes and deemed the assay to be MORE ACCURATE than the company’s own claims, well in excess of 90%, over a 10 year period and half a million patient cases. Genomic Health has been valued in excess of $1 billion dollars. GHI was a spin-off of Incyte Corp, they’ve since spin off other companies and now are part of Exact Sciences. So they and their PCR tests are behind countless assays driving better treatment decisions and saving lives. Countless tests that have given you and your loved ones peace and hope in your worst times were PCR assays. Most of the standard diagnostics your doctor orders are PCR based diagnostics, tracing back to GHI or it’s spinoffs. If you know or are aware of anyone who was saved by early stage cancer detection, you have PCR to thank IN EVERY CASE.
      No matter what case Jon is trying to make about COvID 19, it is absolutely reckless, dishonest and shameful for him to spread such fantastic falsehoods as “the PCR is an unproven fraud”. HE CHOSE NOT TO SEE THE DEcADES OF PUBLISHED EVIDENCE. That not sufficient to support his preposterous conclusion. It exists. I wrote some of it. I’ll publicly debate Jon on this anytime and destroy him. And I sincerely love Jon and support everything he’s saying right up to the line of saying these crazy things. But someday you’re going to be at a crossroads and a PCR test may be the most important thing standing between you and the rest of your life. And I cannot in good conscience let these Jon’s saying go by unchallenged on the off chance that you might believe it and pass on a life saving test. Because PCR tests have verifiably saved millions of lives and I can give you the names and addresses of the very people it saved who will tearily tell you this exact same thing. And for the record this is just something I did for a job that I don’t have anymore. I don’t have any vested interest or financial stake. I’m telling you all this because it is the verified truth about a life and death matter. So you deserve to know it. Jon can you please stop now?!

      No the COVID 19 tests aren’t worth a good goddamn. I’ll tell you that without hesitation. But if you let this info deter you from the good PCR based tests, that hundreds of researchers spent years perfecting and validating, the cost could be your life. It’s VERY irresponsible of Jon to be convoluting facts he has chosen not to know anything about. You’re better than this Jon. You made your point, why push it to the point of losing all your credibility? PCR has saved millions of lives. And abundance of evidence exists to prove it. These are the facts. Period.

      • Madness says:

        I am a very simple someone, I admit it. But due to this I use common sense and experience only when try to form an opinion. Cancer is poisoning. We don’t need PCR (I don’t need it) and I never ever would trust in it even in connection with cancer. I wouldn’t like to be bullied into a treatment (based on further poisoning) to treat poisons. If I am unable to find what poisoned me, if my body unable to heal by itself then any usual treatments of it are just suffering to gain 1-2 extra years for the cost of feeling terrible. We have cancer cells born all the time and immune system to deal with them. I gave up on cancer screening long time ago. I don’t want to know, I don’t want to live in fear and programming my mind to this direction as my thought, my fear might help to form cancer. I read many articles here and there that people were bullied into unnecessary surgeries and treatments and misdiagnosed and mistreated. While your own body is the only one to really be able to turn back cancerous process and you surely notice if you have when it cause problem.
        Screenings: mammography, a cruel screening capable to cause cancer, X ray is unhealthy, too. Now this. What else? All just to be tied closely to Big Pharma and its ‘priests’ while we, most of us, were far more healthy without them involving into our lives with vaxxes, drugs and the madness they call ‘prevention’.

        It’s not the way. In my granny’s time cancer was unknown. In my mother’s time it was rare. What happened between the two times? More vaccines, more visits to GP ‘just to see me, my headache can be even cancer’ – pre-programming. A drug for every uncomfortable feeling. Changes in agriculture, artificial fertilisers, mass use of pesticides, and herbicides. Changing in eating, due to the nice docs stating that animal fats are unhealthy (lie), eggs are unhealthy (lie), less sodium is good for you (lie, ‘sodium-potassium pump of cells read after it’) and many more. Nowadays living in the fear / screening and living in a poisoned environment cancer is very common.

        What my granny did to ‘avoid’ it? (They didn’t even think about it as cancer was not a threat.) As I just have to copy it and I’ll be fine.
        She ate healthy food, the old-type healthy. Home made dishes including proper fat aka. animal fat, she never would use oils for cooking or eating, salads were not a dish but vinegar soured side dish to meat, she ate animals nose to tail, even fried blood and organs, veggies, grains, fresh fruits, nuts.But what stood out was a lot of different animal fats like bread with duck fat and fresh onions, lots of eggs and lots of fresh fruits and some raw veggies. She wouldn’t have touched oils if was not in a nut any longer, or margarine, or pasteurised products. By this time I understood that food is not only calorie, food is code to your cells to fix themselves to be healthy or sick.

        Now we are living in a world to CREATE problems just to be able to sell the pricey CURE what doesn’t work most of the time like cancer treatments.

        Stay away from poisons, vaccines and drugs, use and eat natural product from clean sources, wear silk, cotton, LET your body to have air, stay away from new ‘scientifically proven’ artificial products, cosmetics, chemicals and eat normally as they ate back then. Works surprisingly well.

        I don’t need PCR to save me, thank you. I just wish I could solve with less effort and money to have healthy water, healthy food, healthy clothes to wear and shielded house to spare me bathing in the EMF soup 24/7.

        I agree with Jon, I don’t need more woo-doo science PCR or else to solve simple things my granny could solve better after having just 6 years in elementary school and with the ‘help’ of tech existed 60-80 years ago. No poison, no illness.


    Outstanding information. The test is meaningless. When will this stop?

    • JJ says:

      Never. Unless “we the people” make them. Otherwise It’s only going to get progressively worse. I love Jon’s articles on fakeness of the virus but he seems to count on some politician or group of honest doctors to stop this madness. Never going to happen. Civil disobedience, non-compliance of tens or hundreds of millions of people is what it’s going to take to stop the psychopaths. All it would take now is people simply not comply ing with stupid orders. They would be powerless.

    • Deuce says:

      Yeah who needs journals or clinical trials or evidence or even independent retrospective studies? You read this on a blog and it gospel to you now? COVID 19 tests? Garbage. I fully agree. PCR test? Unproven fraud? Believing that is going to cost you or a loved one your life. I highly suggest you get a second opinion. That isn’t a blog. Google the QASAR study. Does this independently reviewed top tier clinical study jive with Jon’s simplistic assertions?

  3. Elize says:

    We are headed in to more lock down potentials – see curfew rules in pubs and restaurants in UK and BC Canada.
    We the People need to stand up – and say NO!

    This could be OVER when WE say it is over, so what are we waiting for?

  4. Larry C says:

    ” “Regulatory status: For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.”

    Translation: Don’t use the test result alone to diagnose infection or disease. Oops.”

    Oops, indeed. Apparently, even the Mainstream Media – with their vast and laser-like resources – overlooked that one.

    Yah know….I’m beginning to distrust mainstream media for some reason… not sure why…just a nagging hunch….

    • Madness says:

      The narrative is now ‘oversensitive’ just as Jon wrote.
      Oversensitive my ass (sorry). Nice words meaning : useless.
      Just don’t wear their masks, if many will abandon it they can screw their plans. As easy as this. Don’t wear it no matter what.
      Apart from that it causes respiratory illnesses rather often it’s psychology. To run the show as otherwise no sign of any pandemics, not even flu. If many don’t wear sooner or later people just look around and the world will look normal.

  5. Larry C says:

    Don’t worry be happy…and when all seems darkest, simply remind yourself, “We’re All In This Together!” (Please excuse me…time to crawl back under my bed.)

  6. From Elsewhere says:

    More mainstream publications havr second thoughts about the COVID-19: Catalyst: Sweden Has a Lower COVID-19 Death Rate Than the US | Jon Miltimore.

    Truth prevails. Spread the truth. Stop masks, stop tests. Live and let live. Prosecute the liars and may this never happen again.

  7. Allen says:

    There is no new virus. “COVID” is just a new label for Pneumonia. RT-qPCR is not a test it is a manufacturing process.

    And let’s not forget to do the math.

    Take 500,000 deaths, divide by 40 PCR cycles, subtract database matches, subtract nursing home slaughter, subtract deaths of despair and delayed care, subtract lives ventilators destroyed, net out a typical flu season… anything left?

    On the bright side now that Covid-Mania is Enemy #1 doesn’t that mean we are officially done with The War On Terror™?

    On the dark side this seems a pyrrhic victory as we’re now having to deal with the Technocratic Taliban who’ve decided for us- no sporting events, no laughter, no joy, no singing, no dancing, no drinking, no socializing, no god other than the State, no music events, stay at home.

    This cannot be allowed to stand.

    • Ralph A. Dee says:

      That’s exactly what I said…..”Covid-19″ appears to me to be basically Pneumonia….and Pneumonia will kill the weak, the old, the sick…….

  8. ak in vt says:

    Amen Jon. Amen.

    Kindest regards,

    AK in VT

  9. Kathy Dopp says:

    I’m a little confused by this article because the name of the virus is SARS-Cov-2 and the name of disease it sometimes causes is COVID-19. Other SARS-Cov viruses detected *might* be similar enough to one of the mutations of SARS-Cov-2 to cause the same symptoms in susceptible (high-risk) persons. I haven’t heard that a SARS-Cov virus is the same as any coronavirus cold virus. I thought SARS-coronavirus and coronavirus were different. I think Jon makes many terrific points and I appreciate his research and putting all his sources together, but seems to sometimes confuse the virus with the disease it sometimes causes in high-risk persons. I do not believe SARS-Cov-2 virus ever causes more than a mild or non-symptomatic case except in conjunction with high-risk conditions, including those conditions reported to the CDC plus vitamin D deficiency, smoking, and vaping.

    • Alessandro says:

      Kathy can I suggest you do some more research on this site, looking at Jon’s many articles on the CV family one of which is the common cold, you know the one for which the labs have never been able to produce a vaccine nor cure.

    • G O says:

      Virus doesnt cause disease. Its a result of disease if that

  10. Piksil says:

    No, the worst test ever devised was the test that NIST used to test the 9/11 rubble for explosives….oh wait, I guess they didn’t do that.

    So yeah, I think you’ve provided enough info to show that it is the worst test ever; both in terms of test results, and the results of those results.

    I guess they’ll keep this crap up until the numbers exceed the bogus H1N1 numbers. It is, after all, the worst ‘pandemic’ in the history of the world.

  11. Njr1983 says:

    I looked for the publication on WHO site, but can’t seem to find the one that Jon references in the above article. Could it have been removed..?
    The closest publication I can find on the WHO site is dated 19th March 2020 and is titled “Laboratory testing for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in suspected human cases”.
    So it’s a very similar to title to the one Jon quotes, but it does not contain the information contained within Jon’s article.
    Could someone post the link to the actual WHO publication / guidance as I want to distribute this information far and wide.
    Thanks in advance..

    • Mos Craciun says:

      No, the first version of the text was in 31.1.2020 , followed by many other versions ( included the one Jon refers to , including the one in 19.3 you refer to , including the one for today) . Please pick up the one you need , by date , at the link below and let me know if you need more assistance . Thanks.*/

      • Njr1983 says:

        Hi Mos,
        Thank you so much for taking the time to respond and help me out, I really appreciate it. I followed the link you provided but unfortunately I still cannot find the publication titled: “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans”

        Nor can I find this statement in any of the publications, from the historical scrapes of the WHO site. The only publication I can find is the one entitled:
        “Laboratory testing for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in suspected human cases”.
        When I download these documents I can’t find this statement in any:

        “Several assays that detect the 2019-nCoV have been and are currently under development, both in-house and commercially. Some assays may detect only the novel virus [COVID] and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are genetically similar.”
        I’m probably making some basic mistake, so apologies. Do you have any other suggestions?

        • Mos Craciun says:

          I will return later today with a more elaborated answer but for the moment please see the below link where the page mentioned by Jon is archived and where you can see the statement you were looking for ( point 3 on the page ) :

        • Mos Craciun says:

          Sorry for the delay in answering. No, you are not making any “basic mistake” as you put it. In fact is a confusion in terms and I will try to clarify it now.

          There are 3 terms in this issue : web page,document and statement.

          1) the particular web page from WHO is a presentation ( introduction) of the document. The web page was changing from time to time, acording with the developments.Starting on 15 May was no longer updated.
          2) the “document” is attached to the web page as a word file and could be downloaded. There you have all items described in the introduction ( presentation) seen on the web page.
          3) the statement Jon writes about was part of the web page presentation and not part of the document attached to the page . It is the statement you were looking for and therefore you can see it on the page and not in the document per se ( attached) . I gave you a saved image of that page, as it looked for several weeks .I hope that solved your problem

          Now, why all those changes of the page ? Official reason is that there were developments and they had to appear properly . Real reason is because WHO got notice of the fact that the “statement” was incriminating and they took it out. But that took some time ….
          Best regards !

  12. hayden says:

    They are on the Mafia gang pay roll(big wealthy interests)…pay them could money/gold they to as there told, plus some have big debt so they are forced to keep there high paying jobs out of fear of losing it all they have.
    And this is just the base they all get donations etc on top of what they already earn.

    Schedule 1 Salaries payable under section 8 of Members of Parliament (Remuneration and Services) Act 2013

  13. ken says:

    “Covid Diagnostic Test: Worst Test ever Devised”

    Depends on what your using it to accomplish. No?

    In this case they want to lock everything down, force people to follow ridiculous rules, hopefully change voting patterns, and to reset the economy due to the upcoming debt bomb.

    Which means it is the PERFECT test. Scare the crap out of people, and if things do fall apart they can always say they had no idea how bad the test was. P e r f e c t !!

  14. lkrys says:

    Once again, excellent research Jon! What a pity that so many people, many of them far better educated and smarter than I are apparently unable or unwilling to re-examine the bologna and bullshit that now passes for news just about EVERYWHERE you look and listen.

  15. Noxious Ghost says:


    It is like boiling water in a pan. Virologists think the bubbles are heating the water.

    When, in fact, the fire under the pan heats the water. And as a consequence, bubbles emerge.



    It is all about fragments, there is nothing uniform.

    Viruses are just a collection of genetic fragments ordered fancifully by a computer. A virus is an abstract model. The software creates the virus according to the programmer’s instructions.

    It doesn’t matter if a PCR test detects one or two of the two sequences looked for, because it is all about fragments.



  16. Arby says:

    David Crowe, who consults for companies selling 5G. I have a problem with that.

  17. Rick Potvin in Phoenix AZ says:

    Good point on the fake-re-opening whipsaw. I myself was hopeful. Recall when Trump said things will open by Easter– which was April 12. They didn’t. Then Gov. Doucy here in AZ said AZ lockdowns end May 15. They didn’t. My BigBox Guitar Store reopened that weekend but I couldn’t go inside because the manager guarded the front door making sure only so many went in at a time with mask on. My entire lesson studio was destroyed after having run it there for 5 years. On my calendar, I stopped keeping track of months of lockdown after the second month. The entire hot AZ summer has ended and having looked forward many times to the first wave ending and a respite, none ever came.

    I had to laugh sardonically when I saw “cartoon virus”, a label first used by a guy named Fosdyke. [quote from Makow: Aloysius Fozdyke belongs to Sydney’s satanist Alpha Lodge. He first unveiled world satanic control here ten years ago. unquote] Who would have thought that the likes of Popeye, SpongeBob or DaffeyDuck could shut down the world– yet here we see the deadly Cartoon Virus do just that. People now believe cartoons are reality. The following CGI cartoon has been used from the beginning in serious reports as an image of the real corona virus.

    Jon wrote “A NUMBER of conditions—none involving COVID, and most involving old traditional diseases—are making people sick.”
    I would add that 5G is a NEW phenomenon that is significant enough to consider in looking at SYMPTOMS that people say are related to Covid. The fracking oil refinery pollution is another specific cause of new symptoms. And we should now list masks as causing new symptoms. We should start with SYMPTOM analysis like the VA does and work backwards from that to conditions.

    I see several calls in comments for people to stand up. Well– that’s fine to say but I’ve been thinking more about activism lately starting with my own anti-masking. I’m working with as my first activist source. I’m not sure what Jon’s activism involves but I’d like to see him on that. has printable labels usable for lanyards and handbills. It’s overwhelming to do too much but we can start doing something. On 5G activism, I’ve been considering buying an RF meter. Mike Singer on Youtube posts examples of himself confronting store managers about the mask which are very instructive. I’ve been handing out free face-shields to masked people who are friendly to me– since a face shield is a step up from a mask for employees who can use them. I’ve started taking BCAA amino-acids to make protein faster so I can build more muscle. Maybe Jon’s readers can each tell us a little bit about what they are doing in terms of activism if they can.

  18. Mos Craciun says:

    Hi Jon ! Re. : remarks about the document from WHO , on your list in position [2] . On the the new page ( after redirection) the document is not missing — if you go down the page you will see it. You can of course download it :

    Is the same draft from 17 January . Of course there are differences in size ( 270 Kb original version versus 470 Kb on the redirected page) , most of them non-relevant for the topic ( all together are 3712 differences , most due to the fact that the first was created with MacOS Word and the second with Microsoft Word ).

    Hope it helps. Thanks.

  19. Jomsvikings says:

    Impressive research Jon! I appreciate your hard work and timely reports.

    Well…guess what; you’re spot on:

    “SCOTTISH Government health chief Jason Leitch admitted the tests used to detect Covid cases are “a bit rubbish”,

    Transalation: He thinks the PCR test is BS! Lol.

    Prof. Leitch is the top health guy in Scotland, impeccable credentials & a highly respected member in the medical community.

    You are right Jon – well done.

  20. OzzieThinker says:


    Of course my first article on Coronavirus explained (after Bechamp) ALL viruses are caused by pollution, so “what” pollution in this case? In the US, it seemed to be “something” released by the 5G network.

    My next article discussed the human automation in an “extra-terrestrial” sense and introduced Elon Musk.

    My latest article puts the whole cake together, giving you and your book many plugs. Here are some topical snippets

    “…In conjunction with the World Health Organisation (WHO), Centres of Disease Control have been prominent agitators pushing every “epidemic” in living memory. Rabid cries (amplified by WHO) have been heard around all four corners of the globe, regardless of lack of severity. My prior article exampled the Swine Flu fiasco but, for Coronavirus, the CDC has teamed up with safe bet Bill Gates, who, remarkably, is neither medical expert nor professional. Yet that hasn’t stopped them. Gates ran a computer company with an early reputation for pinching collaborator’s ideas and other forms of sharp practice. Because of his privileged upbringing, the shadow government eventually felt he was stable enough to own the company that was booked in to rule the global software market. Anyway, after leaving Microsoft with enough cash to sink a battleship, he poured his heart into a tax dodge, sorry, I mean, foundation that focused on healthcare (apparently a passion of his wife, co-founder). Medias’ spared no effort in (deceptively) promoting a “generous” gift of “$5 billion worth” of polio vaccines to “the peoples of India”. Forerunner of the sugar cube, vaccines he offloaded were actually tainted, dumped stock which had been rejected by the west (because of reports of a litany of dreadful side effects) long ago, but more on that later.

    Even so, Gates’ “philanthropy” spring boarded his medical career. Such was the momentum, Warren Buffet (prior to his catching cancer) and a few prominent others sensationally played the tweedle dum tweedle dee “big note” investment act for a while. Well, that was until the press lost interest. We should have all received the message loud and clear. Mega money was backing healthcare and you don’t mess with mega-money. Personally I have been a regular subscriber to efficient reporting journalistic icon Jon Rappoport’s various blogs for many moons. In my last article I gave his outstanding book “AIDS Inc.” a weighty plug, not for commercial reasons, but because what he wrote twenty years ago is as current as ever today. Then, those behind the seasonal HIV scam were apparently doing cartwheels over amounts of money to be made from healthcare. Worse still, according to Dr. Judy Mikovits (whose career was ruined by HIV), the same key guys have critical roles to play supplying the current and very much “in our faces” Coroonavirus psy-op. Stakes for humanity were high last time round because, as Jon disturbingly points out in AIDS Inc., in deference to HIV, AZT (the billed “cure”) was cause of AIDS. Unconscionably, effects of that tragic “medication” had been long known, neatly tying in with fevered Globalist eugenics goals…

    ,,,Australian procedures. Here the process is two pronged (I’m led to believe). First “practitioners” (same as lawyers and accountants, but I felt Islamic fundamentalists made a clearer analogy in my prior essay) ram a coarse cotton bud up the nose, which, when not violently rupturing blood vessels, guarantees a patient’s wince. Though I doubt the medical people do anything more than following orders, the reason this is actioned is to capture external pollution collected in the nasal cavities (ironically a body’s first line of defense against malady). One must presume everyone has a bit of technology age electromagnetism up there. Australian initial test batches weren’t that stringent, so very few were wedeled out as nose bud “positive”. Step two comprised of collecting blood samples which were sent “somewhere” to be scanned, something sinister governing authorities very much relied on as best means for delivering the goods. Active patients I interviewed had waited “weeks” for results of what they were told was an “antibody test” (I highlight in my first article authorities have never actually isolated a “virus” and are forced to review biological carnage). After the fact we now know, beyond a few Media stalked geriatrics perspiring on queue and awkward false positives, goods were not delivered which rendered the Australian campaign almost (emphasized) a write off (as a monumental flop)….

    …Were schemers to be successful second time round, enlisted support of hysterically disoriented and suitably naïve medical “professionals” must be viewed as a prerequisite. In this regard, it seems odd that Australian private hospitals would turn away incomers with smokers’ cough “in case” they were COVID infected, yet I have received reports that affirm this lack of professionalism. Though public hospitals could be censured for employing typically “programmed” thoughtless nurses, steps are at least in place to serve all incomers desirous of ascertaining good health status. I outlined what’s involved with the testing process earlier. When cotton bud rammed up the nose doesn’t produce prompt results, blood samples are ritually dispatched to an unspecified location. I emphasized if the cotton bud application is to be regarded as pertinent, it confirms cause of illness is definitely fault of pollution. Data emerging from the US adds almost undeniable weight to considerations that determine overall culprit is electromagnetic pollution. Late into my investigation, I have been privileged to interview an American nurse, who implies testing protocols are universal. In her case a hard plastic implement was used to (medics informed her) “collect a DNA sample”. It was inserted very deep (just stopping before the membrane that covers the “third eye”) and “twisted” several times. Results proved positive, but she wasn’t sick, so authorities ammended diagnosis to “false positive“. A “burning sensation” about her third eye lingered for a prolonged period following the ordeal….”

    BTW, Google seems to be stripping “anti-sentiment”. Are we seeing Big Brother in motion for the first time?


  21. Tom OKeefe says:

    The truth is in this column by Jon. The problem is how to force the issue of the tests being inaccurate. After all Kerry Mullis said they should NEVER be used to diagnose disease because of this. Further, they don’t follow the Koch postulates of PROVING a virus.

    Years from now, after a MULTITUDE of law suits against the government for ruing lives and business have gone to trial, these FACTS may come to light but for now they will remain hidden to most because the COURTS are locked up and behind in their schedules.

    The Shadow Elite KNOW this and are depending on it.

  22. Robert C says:

    Kathy, you’ve answered your concerns in your first sentence: ” I’m a little confused”. I don’t believe with over 30 years of investigative reporting that Jon is going to print something that he hasn’t thoroughly checked out. Meaning FACTS. It’s a lot to have to do to come up with all these truths. As you will find, main stream media, big Pharma, CDC, WHO and all the criminals and politicians in the medical “profession” spent every penny they have, including yours out of your taxes to keep everybody confused. Somebody, in this case it’s Jon, has to wade through all of the BS and lies and find the real truth.
    Thank you, Jon!

  23. HANNAH NYBERG says:

    My activism: I do not wear a mask anywhere. I do not try to intimidate or shame anyone I interact with who happens to be masked up.

    I drive over the road, so the job takes me to “lock-down” states, and the delivery sites all have the “masks are required” signs. I do not comply. I have a glow-in-the-dark Jason mask, from that horror movie, which I have not seen, and I carried it in the first 3 times I picked up/ delivered and picked up again, way back in April. Same response: “oh, take that thing off, it’s scary”; I take it off, we laugh, and transaction completed. From weigh stations/ports of entry to Tyson meat plants, signs everywhere, and I am a minority of one most of the time for non-compliance…no pushback from guards or shipping clerks, and certainly not from DOT officers, cuz they’re not masked either, and I already know, they really do not appreciate masked strangers coming into the DOT site (we drivers outnumber them).

    I was at the Smithfield plant in Sioux Falls on April 12th 2020 to pick up a load of beef going to a Smithfield plant outside Indianapolis. I saw the plant workers leaving en masse. This was at noon on Easter Sunday. The guard said a bunch of workers “tested positive for the virus” and the plant was shutting down. The guard and I agreed there was no test, but the plant was still closing. I confirmed that she would still be working, so, the site was still secured.

    The mayor failed to get the governor to approve his attempt to lock down the city of Sioux Falls, but most of the employers succeeded in frightening the locals into the mask/anti-social distancing/self-imprisonment, including Smithfield, which employs a solid 25% of the local population…most of whom are Hispanic/somali, not proficient in English, fearful of law enforcement, and only want to work and support their families.

    What this proves to me is that, yes, Pappa was correct: 75-80% of any given population are going to follow blindly, keep their heads down, not make waves, and complain, and not do one blessed thing to improve the situation.

    That’s good cover for us “non-compliants”, if we know how to use this cover. There are strategies involved, to remain “at large” and freely non-compliant. There are books that have not yet been banned or burned from which you can educate yourself in these strategies…Gulag Archipelagio, and most of Franz Kafka’s work come to mind.

    Also, The economic impact: I will not spend one dime in the lock-down states, nor will I patronize any of the big retailers/grocers that imposed this nonsense upon their workers and customers. Obviously this takes some work on my part, and I can’t completely abandon the big box stores, since I have to attend to safe parking for a 53′ trailer. So, Walmart is the fall-back position here, now, and when I see road-side stands selling fruit/veggies, I usually have parking for a 10-15 minute transaction…and everyone was thankful for my patronage of their little stores.

    Meanwhile, I encourage everyone on this blog to find and patronize local butchers/game processors/ meat lockers/ farmer markets, and know who will trade with you for different foodstuffs. Know a secure water supply, too.

    My folk suffered greatly to become a part of this country, and I grew up on some horror stories that, as an adult, I now understand that us kids were only told what was easier to tell, if told at all…history that will never see the light of day except in the memories of those who lived it, and those they trusted to carry on the family story and knowledge.

    My current project is to decide where I want to be when the 3rd quarter of the Bolshevik game is at 10 seconds or less, as I believe, if early 20th century ukrainian/russian history serves as a template, that’s when the 75-80% will get a most unpleasant “reveal”. At this time, it looks like Halloween will be the last holiday.

    Respectfully submitted,

  24. David Mandelstamm says:

    Okay, I didn’t read ALL the comments before posting mine. So I apologise in advance if I’m restating something that’s already been said.

    So here goes… The PCR test isn’t fraudulent. Here’s what I mean. I looked it up, and the test was invented by a biochemist, Kary Mullis. He died last year at age 74. For what it’s worth, he received a Novel prize (not for the PCR test), and was undoubtedly a smart guy. Well “above MY pay grade”!

    Here’s the payoff: Mullis stated that his PCR was never intended to diagnose disease! (Read that again.) Rather, it was intended for applications like biomedical research and criminal forensics.

    So what we have here is a medical test being used for a purpose for which it was never intended! (By the same token, try wiping your bottom with a nylon-bristle kitchen vegetable brush. You probably wouldn’t get good results, and you would end up with a sore bottom. Why? Because the PURPOSE of the brush is to scrub potatoes or carrots… NOT wipe your bottom!)

    • glenn says:

      We do need to be careful citing Kary Mullis comments on PCR as the current RT-PCR is not invented by Mullis. So the mainstream can easily “debunk” any of Mullis comments as relevant to the topic of testing.

      Unsurprisingly, the current RT-PCR is also not for diagnosing disease. I’ve seen the fact-checking articles on PCR that “debunk” the claims of faulty PCR results. They say PCR alone is not used to diagnosis disease. Diagnosis involves multiple tools and analysis to come up with results so trust the numbers.

      Except one forgotten detail as Jon mentioned above is that all positive results from the PCR is required to be sent to the health authorities. While the real proper diagnosis of COVID cases takes time and is still ongoing, health authorities are publicly reporting positive results from PCR as is.

      • Mos Craciun says:

        Glenn, forgive me for asking , stupid idiot me : diagnosis for what illnesss , for what disease ? Can you define it, please ? But please, don’t give me a very long list of symptoms , which are common to a very long list of diseases .

        What is the cause of the “disease” you gonna mention ? A bacteria, fungi, virus,microb, etc.? Did you see it? Anyone presented it to you in a convincing , scientific manner ? Because stupid idiot me I think we discuss here science not dogma , reality not religion.

        How come the “cause” ( bacteria, fungi, virus,microb) didn’t show up before the end of the Cold War ? How come didn’t show up before 9/11 ? Is it because the military-industrial complex was still busy ?

        How come didn’t show up before the regional ( local) scams named AIDS, swine flu , ebola, Zika, etc. took place ? Is it because the new Vatican ( WHO) was still in preparations before launching in full the new cartel in power named pharmaco-medical complex ?

        Please enlighten me ! Thanks.

Comments are closed.