by Jon Rappoport
June 19, 2018
To give you an idea of the deception inherent in socialism, here is a quote from none other than Andrew Carnegie, once one of the richest men in America:
“I believe Socialism is the grandest theory ever presented, and I am sure it will someday rule the world. Then we will have attained the Millennium… Then men will be content to work for the general welfare and share their riches with their neighbors.” (The New York Times, 1 January 1885, “A Millionaire Socialist”)
Carnegie, of course, like several of his ultra-rich compatriots, devised a method to give away his riches while keeping them: the non-profit foundation.
The last thing on Carnegie’s bloated mind was becoming “equal” with the great unwashed.
He was a liar of the first order. He recognized that, when you win the game of free enterprise, your most corrupt bet is to turn around and find every possible way to block others from winning. Then, you stand at the top of the heap, unchallenged.
That is exactly what he had in mind. That’s what socialism actually meant to him.
Let’s see socialism for what it is. Not in the abstract, but in reality.
Socialism is:
The taking of money (taxes) from some people who work for it and giving it to others who don’t work for it. On a grand scale.
The vast expansion of freebies doled out by central government. In order to create and sustain dependence.
The government protection of favored persons and corporations, permitting them and aiding them to expand their fortunes without limit, regardless of what crimes they commit in the process. (Monsanto would be a fine example.)
The squeezing out of those who would compete with the favored persons and corporations.
The dictatorship by and for the very wealthy, pretending to be the servant of the masses.
The lie that the dictatorship is being run by the masses.
The gradual lowering of the standard of living for the overwhelming number of people.
The propaganda claiming socialism is the path to a better world for all.
In other words, socialism is a protection racket and a long con and a heartless system of elite control, posing as the greatest good.
It is just another form of top-down tyranny—as old as the hills.
A year or two ago, a person living in Europe told me that the European Union was not a problem, because it was just another layer of socialism placed over the existing socialist governments of European nations, and no one really noticed the existence of the EU.
—As if blindness were a reason not to worry.
SOCIALISM WAS NEVER ABOUT UNIVERSAL EQUALITY AND UNIVERSAL SHARING.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS UNIVERSAL AND COMPLETE EQUALITY AND SHARING, ONLY A FAKE VERSION DICTATED FROM ABOVE.
Socialism is, in the minds of most people who advocate it, a vague sentiment about people being kinder to each other.
Consider this fatuous and ludicrous statement, uttered by the mob boss of bosses of the Soviet Union, Nikita Khrushchev, in 1961: “The socialist economy has become so strong, so vigorous that from the summits we have reached we can issue an open challenge of peaceful economic competition to the most powerful capitalist country—the United States of America.”
Here is a correct translation: “Bankrolled and given vital technology by a few elites from the West, our vast society of socialist slave workers is now able to engage in capitalist competition with America.”
The raving of a madman.
Today’s youth who push and protest and riot and censor, on behalf of socialism, are working for the ultra-rich whom they despise.
That’s the long and short of “the glorious revolution.”
The Carnegies and Rockefellers of today (including a miniature Rockefeller named George Soros) have engaged the young as foot soldiers, and they know the young are willing dupes for socialism, because they created, for the young, an education system that makes them clueless and mindless.
The Carnegies and Rockefellers of today are saying: “Bring on the new world, the better world, the more just world, the happier world—whatever you want to call it—so we can run it from the top and show you what we really think of you. Make every conceivable lever of power ours, and then we’ll reveal what we really have planned for you.”
The prodigious author and researcher, Antony Sutton (1925-2002), wrote about hidden men (“socialists”) behind momentous events. He exposed their fraud of working for “the greater good.”
I recently came across a 1999 interview with Sutton, conducted by Kris Millegan, researcher and head of TrineDay publishers.
Millegan wrote about Antony Sutton in 1999: “Antony C. Sutton, 74, has been persecuted but never prosecuted for his research and subsequent publishing of his findings. His mainstream career was shattered by his devotion towards uncovering the truth. In 1968, his Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development was published by The Hoover Institute at Stanford University. Sutton showed how the Soviet state’s technological and manufacturing base, which was then engaged in supplying the North Vietnamese the armaments and supplies to kill and wound American soldiers, was built by US firms and mostly paid for by the US taxpayers. From their largest steel and iron plant, to automobile manufacturing equipment, to precision ball-bearings and computers, basically the majority of the Soviet’s large industrial enterprises had been built with the United States help or technical assistance.”
“…Then, someone sent Antony a membership list of Skull and Bones and— ‘a picture jumped out’. And what a picture! A multigenerational foreign-based secret society with fingers in all kinds of pies and roots going back to ‘Illuminati’ influences in 1830’s Germany.”
Here are excerpts from the 1999 interview:
Millegan – Can you tell the story of how you learned of Skull & Bones? And how you felt?
Sutton – I knew nothing of S&B until I received a letter in the early 80’s asking if I would like to look at a genuine membership list. For no real reason I said yes. It was agreed to send the package by Federal Express and I could keep it for 24 hours, it had to be returned to the safe. It was a “black bag” job by a family member disgusted with their activities.
For the benefit of any S&B members who may read and doubt the statement; the membership list is in two volumes, black leather bound. Living members and deceased members in separate volumes. Very handsome books.
I spent all night in Kinko’s, Santa Cruz, copied the entire volumes and returned within the 24 hour period.
I have never released any copies or identified the source. I figured each copy could be coded and enable S&B to trace the leak.
How did I feel? I felt then (as I do now} that these “prominent” men are really immature juveniles at heart. The horrible reality is that these little boys have been dominant in their influence in world affairs. No wonder we have wars and violence. Skull and Bones is the symbol of terrorist violence, pirates, the SS Deaths Head Division in WW Two, labels on poison bottles and so on.
I kept the stack of xerox sheets for quite a while before I looked at them—when I did look—a picture jumped out, THIS was a significant part of the so called [socialist] establishment. No wonder the world has problems!
Millegan: – What did your study of elites, economics, secrecy and technology do for your career?
Sutton – Depends what you mean by “career”?
By conventional standards I am an abject failure. I’ve been thrown out of two major Universities (UCLA and Stanford), denied tenure at Cal State Los Angeles. Every time I write something, it appears to offend someone in the Establishment and they throw me to the wolves.
On the other hand I’ve written 26 books, published a couple of newsletters and so on…even more important I’ve never compromised on the truth. And I don’t quit.
In material terms…hopeless failure. In terms of discovery…I think I’ve been successful. Judge a man by his enemies. William Buckley called me a “jerk”. Glenn Campbell, former Director of the Hoover Institution, Stanford called me “a problem”.
Millegan – Did any of Hitler’s economic policies threaten the interests of the international bankers, and if so did that play a role in his downfall?
Sutton – Hitler’s economic policies were OK’d by the bankers right through the war…ITT, Chase, Texaco and others were operating in Nazi-held France as late as 1945. In fact Chase in Paris was trying to get [acquire] Nazi accounts as late as 1944. When we got to Germany in May 1945, I remember seeing a (bombed-out) Woolworth store in Hamburg and thinking, “What’s Woolworth doing in Nazi Germany?” While we were bombed and shelled it was “business as usual” for Big Business. Try the Alien Custodian Papers.
…Union Banking is very important. I made a documentary for Dutch National TV some years ago. It got all the way through the production process to the Dutch TV Guide…at the last minute it was pulled and another film substituted. This documentary has proof of Bush financing Hitler—documents.
Maybe my Dutch friends will still get it viewed, but the [Skull&Bones] apparatus reaches into Holland.
Millegan – What is the story that was going to be told on Dutch TV? And what is the story of its censorship?
Sutton – Couple of years back, a Dutch TV production company from Amsterdam—under contract to Dutch National TV—came to US to make documentary on S&B [Skull and Bones]. They went to the Bones Temple and other places and interviewed people on East Coast. On West Coast, they interviewed myself and one other person.
I saw extracts from the original and it is a good professional job. They had documents linking Bush family and other S&B members to financing Hitler through Union Banking of New York and its Dutch correspondent bank. More than I have in [Sutton’s book] WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER.
The first version was later upgraded into a two part documentary and scheduled for showing this last March. It was pulled at last minute and has never been shown.
Millegan – What do you see for the future?
Suttton – Chaos, confusion and ultimately a battle between the individual and the State.
The individual is the stronger; and will win. The state is a fiction sanctified by Hegel and his followers to CONTROL the individual.
Sooner or later people will wake up. First we have to dump the trap of right and left, this is a Hegelian trap to divide and control. The battle is not between right and left; it is between us and them…
—end of interview excerpt—
Here is a telling Antony Sutton quote from his book, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy (1986):
“By using data of Russian origin it is possible to make an accurate analysis of the origins of this equipment. It was found that all the main diesel and steam-turbine propulsion systems of the ninety-six Soviet ships on the Haiphong supply run [to the North Vietnamese] that could be identified (i.e., eighty-four out of the ninety-six) originated in design or construction outside the USSR. We can conclude, therefore, that if the [US] State and Commerce Departments, in the 1950s and 1960s, had consistently enforced the legislation passed by Congress in 1949, the Soviets would not have had the ability to supply the Vietnamese War – and 50,000 more Americans and countless Vietnamese would be alive today.”
“Who were the government officials responsible for this transfer of known military technology? The concept originally came from National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger, who reportedly sold President Nixon on the idea that giving military techno¬logy to the Soviets would temper their global territorial ambitions. How Henry arrived at this gigantic non sequitur is not known. Sufficient to state that he aroused considerable concern over his motivations. Not least that Henry had been a paid family employee of the Rockefellers since 1958 and has served as International Advisory Committee Chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank, a Rockefeller concern.”
If you think such traitorous actions could never have occurred, I point you to another researcher, Charles Higham, and his 1983 classic, Trading with the Enemy.
Higham focuses on World War 2. The men behind the curtain Higham exposed are in the same basic group that Antony Sutton exposed.
Higham, Trading with the Enemy:
“What would have happened if millions of American and British people, struggling with coupons and lines at the gas stations, had learned that in 1942 Standard Oil of New Jersey [part of the Rockefeller empire] managers shipped the enemy’s [Germany’s] fuel through neutral Switzerland and that the enemy was shipping Allied fuel? Suppose the public had discovered that the Chase Bank in Nazi-occupied Paris after Pearl Harbor was doing millions of dollars’ worth of business with the enemy with the full knowledge of the head office in Manhattan [the Rockefeller family among others?] Or that Ford trucks were being built for the German occupation troops in France with authorization from Dearborn, Michigan? Or that Colonel Sosthenes Behn, the head of the international American telephone conglomerate ITT, flew from New York to Madrid to Berne during the war to help improve Hitler’s communications systems and improve the robot bombs that devastated London? Or that ITT built the FockeWulfs that dropped bombs on British and American troops? Or that crucial ball bearings were shipped to Nazi-associated customers in Latin America with the collusion of the vice-chairman of the U.S. War Production Board in partnership with Goering’s cousin in Philadelphia when American forces were desperately short of them? Or that such arrangements were known about in Washington and either sanctioned or deliberately ignored?”
Getting the picture?
War, what is it good for? With the same “socialist” elites backing both sides, it’s good for business. It’s good for creating chaos and destruction. It’s good for launching new global organizations, in the aftermath; organizations that exert a level of control and reach that didn’t exist before. It’s good for launching organizations like the United Nations and the European Union and the World Trade Organization—dedicated to Globalism, which in turn is dedicated to planned civilization, in which the individual is demeaned and the group is All.
Freedom is demeaned; and dominance by the few over the many is hailed as peace in our time.
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
Reblogged this on John Barleycorn and commented:
This spells out the grand illusion quite well.
“History is a set of lies agreed upon”… and the power elite give us the education of a slave. Keeping Hitler demonized and the constant reminder/memories of the Holohoax, is paramount to keep their New World Order moving in the direction they want…and that’s to rule over the entire world through commerce. If they lose their holohoax and people find out Germany wasn’t the bad guy…would mean the end of their bid to create a one world everything.
“The Holocaust is a deeply anchored belief even in people who know very little about it. We can see that not only does disbelief in the Holocaust myth threaten modern Jewish identity as shaped by political Zionism, but for others it brings into question the credibility of those in authority who told everyone it was true: the state, the churches, the schools, and media of every kind. These sources are the same ones people trust and depend on every day for information. If these trusted authorities are wrong about the Holocaust, what else are they wrong about? What other dishonesties are they promoting?”– John Weir, The Holocaust as Myth: Betraying the Public Trust
This is what 34 historians said when they could not present any physical proof of the existence of homicidal gas chambers. “One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.”— “34 reputable historians” published in the prominent French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979
Good article Jon!!!
Linked as usual at:
https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
along with some other good reads!!!
What they do and say isn’t real socialism by any stretch. It’s just money in their hands, and keeping a hold of it no matter what, alongside their psychotic thinking, twisting and scheming under any political ideology.
The reality is that most who advocate or support, or promote socialism, are really Marxists in disguise. Its a more subtle way of taxing the hell out of the middle class while hardly taxing the elite corps. at all. Its been a very effective means of deceit and subterfuge. Very effective for those befitted in the short term by it do not see the long term enslavement it comes with.
As for the elite being boys, it is an odd paradox that once a young developing chlid is traumatized, either by a single horrific event or a accumulation of a repeated slight such as continual neglect of emotional or physical needs, will stunt and freeze the child’s development until that trauma is brought to conscious to be consciously experienced, and only then will the mind be able to progress from the point where the trauma took place.
That is why so many adults seem to be children, for in fact, that is as far as they were able to get before being frozen by trauma and getting stuck. traumas are important to learn from as they provide foundation blocks of learning and setting policy.
for this reason, psychologists (legitimate ones) will have to help the recovering patient go back over his/her life and learn the right ways and right conclusions that they should have gotten from their parents. Its called Re-parenting in some circles and by some authors. In many cases, the patient will partially re-parent themselves.
when you consider it from a dark point of view, the idea of traumatizing a child is brilliant in a diabolical way, in that it blocks most if not all further development, leaving the child-to-become-adult with no wind or engine on their boat and no rudder, either, nor compass, sextant or anything else to guide them across the ocean. They just drift with the currents.
Wow, Jon, insightful article. I admired Carnegie as a child because my small town had a Carnegie library and I thankfully made much use of it. That illusion was shattered when I learned how Carnegie conspired with Rockefeller to control medicine. It is my understanding that the impetus for this was that Rockefeller wanted his oil used in as many ways as possible, and that, unknown to us, much pharma was derived from oil. No wonder it is so bad for us.
“… We can conclude, therefore, that if the [US] State and Commerce Departments, in the 1950s and 1960s, had consistently enforced the legislation passed by Congress in 1949, the Soviets would not have had the ability to supply the Vietnamese War …”
No such conclusion can be made, in strict logic, using principle “hypothesis contrary to fact”.
We don’t know what the Soviets would have done, or would have been able to do, in that case.
You referred to Secret Societies & Psychological Warfare by Michael Hoffman in one of your posts about Sandy Hook a couple of years back. You can download a copy free and I have been reading it…
You referenced that book because some of the odd ‘synchronicities’ that popped up in the Sandy Hook shooting. The name of the town – Sandy Hook – appearing in The Dark Knight… and then quite curious the author of The Hunger Games lives in Newtown etc.
On the surface of it these coincidences are pretty far out and seem utterly meaningless. Most of us – including of course news sources – easily dismiss these things and move on. News is round the clock isn’t it..?
It is obvious you wanted to lay some of these coincidences at the door(s) of one or more secret societies… maybe the Skull & Bones mentioned above. Now the book Secret Societies is quite interesting… it does seem to take a Christian viewpoint but it links one or more of these societies to traditions that go quite far back in history.
And though it touches on some of their methods – its focus is more on their philosophies as opposed to disparate methods – it doesn’t really explain the coincidences involved in Sandy Hook – or for instance 911. The passport of Neo from The Matrix is another one of those weird coincidences and its expiration date coincides with 911.
Still you can begin to imagine some of what ‘they’ would have to be able to do to make some of these things possible – how long and deep their reach might have to be and what their attitudes to you and me – uh fellow human beings – must be like to make these things possible for them to accomplish… without a second thought so to speak. Just thinking about these things is enough to undermine – well the commonplace notions many of us have about things.
So I thought about this when reading some of this interview and in particular his comment:
“How did I feel? I felt then (as I do now} that these “prominent” men are really immature juveniles at heart. The horrible reality is that these little boys have been dominant in their influence in world affairs. No wonder we have wars and violence. Skull and Bones is the symbol of terrorist violence, pirates, the SS Deaths Head Division in WW Two, labels on poison bottles and so on.”
Hmm… yes really immature … in the grand scheme of things without doubt there is some real truth there but it strikes me immature or not they are incredibly dangerous and have more than enough power to make things possible to them – like 911 – like the JFK assasination – and unfortunately like some of these shootings that they need to be taken quite seriously. Too seriously.
The essence is here – I know you agree and many people that find your blog and stuff would agree to I am sure:
“Chaos, confusion and ultimately a battle between the individual and the State.
The individual is the stronger; and will win. The state is a fiction sanctified by Hegel and his followers to CONTROL the individual.
Sooner or later people will wake up. First we have to dump the trap of right and left, this is a Hegelian trap to divide and control. The battle is not between right and left; it is between us and them…”
In between… well this isnt gonna be much fun at all… imagination – our souls – well by their nature cannot be controlled. The end is a forgone conclusion however it plays out… but our history has been plagued by this… chaos… their ‘gift’ to us… and our future until we get it will be too… the funny thing is they hardly even have to hide anymore. Do they?
None of us believe this stuff… its too far out… and some of us even worship it. Or have a grudging respect for it… We are gonna learn the hard way. And as for sooner or later… it looks like much later… the getting it part ….
I have read stuff from Antony Sutton before in some article I was reading several years ago and was always fascinated with his work, but didn’t realize he had a book. It’s on kindle at amazon but it didn’t get very good reviews (which kinda surprises me) so I didn’t know if I should get it or not. It’s only $3.99 though, so I might end up buying it (Seven Scrolls). The other book (Best Enemy Money Can Buy) is not available on kindle, but I might order that later on. I think it would be interesting reading.
The Wall Street trilogy by Antony Sutton details how the “corporate socialists” of New York supported the Bolshevik revolution, the Franklin Roosevelt administration, and Hitler’s “National Socialist” movement in order to consolidate their own power. Sutton’s later book on the Skull and Bones society exposes another layer in this network.
http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=Sutton
That was a cheap pun when Obama first made it, Jon. It hasn’t improved with time.
Carnegie was right. Welfare is wonderful for imperialism. It both provides a “barely sufficient” safety net for any rebellious slave whilst bleaching all ambition from most would-be entrepreneurs that might “challenge” imperialist goals. Eventually “capitalism” and other competitive trade vehicles would be deemed “obsolete” to be replaced by elite controlled and managed nationalised conglomerates.
Hell tied up in a pink bow.
Best
OT
There is no difference between communism, fascism, marxism, nazism, progressivism or socialism….they are all rebranded feudalism. Karl Marx was cousin of Rothschild, married to second wealthiest in the world Phillips family.
“Karl Marx, Oligarch, Wealthy, Elitist” at AbelDanger(.)org
“Why Big Oil Conquered the World” at CorbettReport(.)com
I agree with you, FSS. Its all feudalism. but there are some differences, at least in scale. first, the Lord of the manner was very visible. there were no delusions about who was in power and control. but with big government, there are so many layers and departments and the fake wars between opposing political camps. Feudalism was too obvious and overt. In your face type of stuff. Its more subtle and crafty now. people do not perceive the connections that are there, now. So our modern system is a stealth system. I have to admit, I am impressed with the craftiness of it all.
The problem with this article is the refusal to take an honest look at “capitalism”. Capitalism cannot exist without government interference. Capitalism’s rise came with so-called “democracy”, which in reality is the ability to buy politicians. While companies have existed for centuries, it wasn’t until “democratic” governments abolished millenia old trade guilds that “capitalism” was able to thrive. This included child labour in factories, and the new economic model of “buyer beware”.
The article focuses on what “socialism” has become, not what it is supposed to be, which is a restraint on the excesses of capitalism contrary to the benefit and/or general welfare of the nation. Today, few, if any, nations exist in “the West”. They are now countries – a geographically defined political entity. This has been brought to you by capitalism, not socialism. Immigration is the reserve army of capital. Capitalism, having purchased the political whores of virtually every “democracy” demands mass immigration to lower/surpress wages. It increases housing costs, because the hundreds of thousands coming every year have to live somewhere. The cost of immigration to the taxpayer is more than $30 billion in Canada. It will easily be 10 times that amount in the US. This leads to real estate speculation and unnecessary housing construction, which require government infrastructure, paid for by tax dollars
Wars are a capitalist speciality, because all wars, including civil and revolutionary wars are about economics: control the land, natural resources, finances, and labour. The average citizen rarely does. In days of absolute monarchies, standing armies were very small. The monarchs understood that only a loyal citizenry could help defeat an invading army. The rise of capitalism has increased the number and frequency of wars. Any honest look at the “British Empire” will recognize the English Revolution, funded by Dutch banks, and the 2nd overthrow of the Stuarts also funded by Dutch banks, created the privately owned Bank of England, and the explosion of wars of conquest around the world. All for the benefit of capitalists.
Who benefits from this? Only the capitalists.
Both capitalism and communism seek to concentrate wealth in the hands of a few. Anyone can buy shares in a company, but it is those who control the company, and their useful idiots, that profit most. Communism is controlled by the commune. What no one wants to admit, is that the commune gets to decide who is in the commune and who isn’t. Even within the commune, some benefit more than others.
As for Mr. Sutton’s observations, why wouldn’t there be a Woolworth’s in Germany if it was there pre WWII? National Socialism was not opposed to private ownership of stores and industry, it was opposed to the international banking cartels. WWII was fought over the NSDAP’s establishment of trade based on commodity exchange e.g. a tonne of iron ore for two tonnes of coal, rather than the “value” of the commodity. This eliminated the need for the International Bank of Settlements taking their unearned slice of the pie.
I leave you with two quotes attributed to the Rothschilds:
– “If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” Gutle Schnaper Rothschild
– “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.”
Nathan Rothschilld
The Rothschilds and their allies are the consumate capitalists.
When the cabal speak of socialism, they really mean communism. Money should be confiscated from the cabal and used to pay off debts, rebuild the nation, and supplement those in need.
Communism, Socialism, Liberalism…all Jewish created and financed into existence. No mistake about it. However, one Eric Hufschmid has analyses of our problems and maybe some solutions. http://www.hugequestions.com