The search for pure ideals in politics

The search for pure ideals in politics

by Jon Rappoport

December 18, 2017

Al Gore was pure. George W Bush was a monster. John Kerry was pure. Bush was still a monster. John McCain and Mitt Romney were monsters. Barack Obama was pure. Trump is pure. Hillary is a monster. Round and round it goes.

Reverse the labels, turn them upside down, inside out, and you arrive at the same dead-end alley at midnight: none of the big-time pols are pure. Far from it.

Yesterday I posted my article on some of the upsides and downsides of Trump. Today, let’s take just a brief small peek at Obama.

Obama was close to purity, “though some of his policies may have been wrong headed.” Really?

The leftist Guardian (1/9/17): “In 2016, US special [military] operators could be found in 70% of the world’s nations, 138 countries – a staggering jump of 130% since the days of the Bush administration.”

“…in 2016 alone, the Obama administration dropped at least 26,171 bombs. This means that every day last year, the US military blasted combatants or civilians overseas with 72 bombs; that’s three bombs every hour, 24 hours a day.”

“As drone-warrior-in-chief, he [Obama] spread the use of drones outside the declared battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq, mainly to Pakistan and Yemen. Obama authorized over 10 times more drone strikes than George W Bush, and automatically painted all males of military age in these regions as combatants, making them fair game for remote controlled killing.”

The champ of bombing. But “pure.”

In 1994, I ran for a seat in the US House of Representatives. Halfway through my campaign, I woke up one day and said, “What the hell am I doing?” I saw one possibility, in case I won. My team and I would go to Washington, rent large trucks, and slap very large posters on them, titled: CORRUPT CONGRESSMAN OF THE WEEK. We would show a photo of the target legislator, and list, in one column, his voting record, and in another column, the money he’d taken to cast those votes. Every week, we’d do that. We’d drive those big trucks around Washington streets, slowly, and in the heaviest traffic. And that’s pretty much all we would do during my term in office. Of course, I would get censured by the House in my first week, and probably booted out of that august body. But it would be fun. And the publicity could highlight the issue of non-purity.

I lost the primary election to a 20-year incumbent, Henry Waxman. So that was that.

The pressures and forces acting on a politician in Washington are numerous. His own Party leaders are telling him how to vote on bills. Lobbyists too numerous to mention are leaning on him for help. (For example, the mighty AIPAC, which is always on the alert re the interests of the state of Israel.) Businessmen from a Congressman’s home district want pork; federal funds for projects. Then there are murky and clandestine influences that come through cutouts for intelligence agencies and the military. The Congressman is spied on by the NSA and other such outfits. His own staff may contain watchdogs, who are secretly reporting his words, attitudes, and actions to these agencies. Outright bribes and offers of future employment in the private sector are quietly placed on the table. The social scene in Washington is seeded with denizens who have agendas and want to be “friends.” It never ends. Every Tom, Dick, Harry, and Mary knows that Washington is where the big money and status live. They come there to Get Some, if they can. Pure ideals? Never heard of them.

On top of all this, you have compromise. “Sir, you’ll never get this bill passed with the current wording. You’ll have to make significant changes. Ask yourself whether you want nothing or a piece of something. Because that’s the situation. And if you do compromise, you’ll be expected to support other people’s bills in the future, bills you won’t like…”

Washington is a giant barn that smells so bad no one in his right mind would want to put a foot in it.

“Giant” is a key word. The severely limited central government spelled out in the Constitution is but a faint memory of a “simpler time.”

The sheer number of crimes taking place in the barn are far too numerous to prosecute, even if the will were there to do it.

If you look up the hill from the barn, you’ll see the mansion where the Rockefeller Trilateral Commission, the inner core of the Council on Foreign Relations, a few Bilderberg agents, Rothschild men, Vatican reps, Chinese and Russian “observers,” EU Globalists, military industrial neocons, and assorted other power players arrive and depart. They monitor the activities in the barn and make sure the general tenor of decisions nudges America deeper into an interdependent web of “the new international order.”

There are several wild cards.

First, for better or worse, “the people.” The population of the nation. They aren’t all asleep. Many are waking up.

Second, independent media, which are exposing corruption and crimes at high levels.

Third, citizens who do have ideals that mirror the faded document called the Constitution, and are motivated to run for public office—who refuse to compromise, who are willing to flame out in Washington, while standing for what they believe in. If they are elected in the first place. A few hundred of these relentless individuals could have a dramatic effect.

The men in the mansion on the summit of the hill are relying on cynicism to carry the day. That’s what they want. They love cynics. And cynics love to say there are no answers and all is lost. That’s how cynics get their juice. They celebrate all political failures, which confirm their world view.

And this is where we come to the inner psychology of the individual. If cynicism reigns, a day of reckoning is on the way. For a while, rejoicing over doom is fashionable and exciting. But then the picnic turns sour. It rains, the food is spoiled, the earth is muddy, the landscape is gray and unforgiving. What then?

Finding lost ideals and charting a new course. Refusing to surrender. Accessing the North Star of imagination, which never dies—and from which limitless energy and unpredictable solutions flow.

THIS inner psychology is outside The System. Utilizing it allows you to re-enter the world with new ideas and answers of your own. Your own.

Newsflash: The game is afoot. It is never over.

As in: never…


Exit From the Matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

19 comments on “The search for pure ideals in politics

  1. Jennifer says:

    Sorry, couldn’t get past the first paragraph. Obama was possessed as was George Bush as was Clinton and many before. If they aren’t before the get in, then they will be. Haven’t had my empath friend look at Trump, but if he isn’t those around his are possessed.

    • FarleyAgain says:

      Jennifer. Most of our “elected leaders” are OWNED – sold into slavery to the NWO crowd. The fact that the NWO crowd serve Satan doesn’t mean they are possessed, but it could.

  2. boobama says:

    obama promised to close guantanamo right away.

    remember?

    he turned out has been better neocon sales rep then w.

    there was hardly a week without celebrity bashing w. in public.

    with obama in, black/white middle class self pacified, and neocon games continued even better.

  3. honestliberty says:

    Jon, you are a true gem.
    Many thanks for your continued efforts and hard work

  4. From Quebec says:

    Every Tom, Dick, Harry, and Mary knows that Washington is where the big money and status live. They come there to Get Some, if they can. Pure ideals? Never heard of them. (jON)
    ————————

    Except for TRUMP who is a billionaire. Nobody can own him. He did not need that Job,he did not need their money. He did not even wanted the job iuntil he realized that he had to do it to save the country.

    He is loosing money by being President, he also gives up his salary to charitable causes. He is not in to make money, that is for sure..He knows they want to kill him, still he is going forward with his agenda.

    sometimes Jon, you make me wonder. You pretend to believe in individual power, but in the same sentence, you deny that an individual like Trump has power..

    I serieusly suggest that you and the people here listens to this video again

    Donald J. Trump: The Long Road to the White House (1980 – 2017)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_1094150607&feature=iv&src_vid=mxf1XmVZ9qY&v=305-erOr3jk

    • From Quebec says:

      Sorry, the part I wanted you to see in this video is the beginning of the video. So, Go back to the very beginning of this video, right now it starts after what I WANTED YOU TO HEAR AND SEE.

    • blue shirt says:

      10:20 mark

    • FarleyAgain says:

      And from what I have heard on the grapevine the new tax bill has quite a lot in it to bankrupt Trump. Very anti-housing.

    • Greg C. says:

      Most people don’t realize that Trump made his fortune in the same way George Washington did – real estate! Washington earned as a surveyor in his twenties, the equivalent of $100,000 a year. He took that money and speculated in land and when he died he was one of the wealthiest Americans.

  5. Tim says:

    Not to be re-framing, but
    “I lost the primary election to a 20-year incumbent, Henry Waxman. So that was that.”

    might actually be … the constituents lost the election to the incumbent, if you know what I mean…

    • Banksy says:

      Congressmen term is only 2 years to secure rotation, except that there are no term limits, so we ending with same pricks for decades.

      Now, since Trump showed an outsider can win, have you thought Jon of giving a shot second time around?

  6. Yeah, your perfectly right. Year after year, the corruption reaches even higher heights. You wonder when it is gonna stop. Will there ever be justice. I am thinking that Hillary will never see the inside of a jail. She is sick, and they will run the time clock out.

    Guess I am dreamer.
    Robert Kennedy Jr seems like the last honest man to me.
    And of course yourself…best of the year to ya.

    I am am full steam ahead in my studio now, and aim to stay there… I’ve been told I am not a great artist. I have a goal now and a deep desire, to be one…maybe 2018 is my year.
    Cheers

    • From Quebec says:

      Good move Michael! Go for it.

      And by the way, and I truly mean it, try to develop skills that will enable you to read peoples faces.

      Reading faces are an art that anyone can achieve,

      Even the corrupted Hollywood idiots know that when they select an actor for a special role, they will never pick up an actor who looks like a little lamb to impersonate a killer,, and vice versa.

      Try it, it is fun and interesting how it is always 100% right. I will say it again: Faces do not lie,

    • Sunshine2 says:

      You are a great artist – with words.

  7. thomaspoa says:

    I wonder if all the current sex scandals are to clear the air for Arnold S. to become president (love child with the maid)?

  8. Though the organisation has never conformed to the foreign person’s espionage Act, I am lead to believe AIPAC (rebranded from “World Zionist Organisation” or something like that) is rather more powerful than you project, Jon.

    Via external mediums/agents AIPAC is reputed to vet ALL mediums with any influence over government, including “alternatives” and “conservationists”.

    Best
    OT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *