COMPROMISED: Sex-abuser Congressmen are open to massive blackmail

COMPROMISED: Sex-abuser Congressmen are open to massive blackmail

by Jon Rappoport

November 23, 2017

Most people are naïve about how intelligence operations are run. Holding damaging secrets on public figures equals the opportunity for blackmail. This strategy was probably discovered by cave men.

—Sex-abuse claims filed against members of Congress—beyond Al Franken and John Conyers—

Where are all the names of these Congressmen? We’re now told that, in the past 10 years, $17 million has been paid out to accusers in small sums. An unknown part of that money was compensation for explicitly sexual offenses.

There are more cases where the accusers simply gave up and refused to pursue claims. They’re potentially waiting in the wings.

Not only are the Congressmen guilty, they’re open to blackmail. As they vote on bills; as they decide which lobbyists to favor; as they decide what advice to follow from intelligence agencies; as they decide whether to take meetings with agents from other countries; they’re always looking over their shoulders, wondering: HOW MUCH DO THESE PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT ME? WHAT SHOULD I DO TO STAY SAFE?

And in some hotel room, late at night, when a person slips them a folder with details of their sexual misdemeanors or felonies, what are they going to do? How are they going to resist whatever is being asked for?


This is the political elephant in the room the mainstream press isn’t talking about.

What about the NSA and the CIA and other spying agencies in the US (and other countries)? How much devastating information about sexual abuse have they gathered on these Congressmen?

How much covert control have the agencies chosen to exercise?


The levels of complexity can be dizzying. Suppose a guilty Congressman learns actual secrets about another politician? His impulse is to blow the whistle. But can he? What will he bring down on his own head?

Suppose he knows vital secrets about Monsanto, Dow, Exxon, Eli Lilly?



An awareness, over the years, spreads through Congress: “Many of us are guilty and we need to protect each other.”

Because it isn’t just the sexual secrets anymore. It’s the subsequent immoral actions taken and not taken, based on being compromised. Based on being controlled.

“Appreciate your committee vote to kill the bill yesterday, Senator. I assure you that thing in Miami last summer…”

“When does our deal end? When are we even? This is worse than prison.”

“It’s not worse. And it never ends. But don’t worry, be happy. Keep playing the game. It’s no skin off your nose.”

“What about honor?”

“Please. You gave that away a long time ago. In Miami. But we also know about the hotel rooms in New York, Washington, Chicago, LA…”

The Congressman can’t believe the bind he’s in. He’s having the above conversation with a man from the CIA. He and the CIA are supposed to be on the same team. And they are, if he’ll understand who is higher in the pecking order, who gives the commands.

One day, he’ll wake up and realize that, among the four women he abused, three were innocent, but one was sent in by the Agency with the task of seducing him. If necessary, at a later date, she could use their night together as blackmail. (For a rough variation on this theme, see numerous accounts of NY Governor Eliot Spitzer’s 2008 hooker scandal, which caused his resignation from office. Spitzer was attacking Wall Street and Big Pharma.)

Then we come to the issue of reporters, who themselves could be compromised, because they’re secretly guilty of sexual abuse.

For example, long-time political reporter, Glenn Thrush (Politico, NY Times, MSNBC), has just been accused of kissing and groping four women. The Times has suspended him from his position covering the White House.

If Thrush, at any time, has been aware of politicians’ misdeeds, did he cover them and expose them fully—or was he “under the gun” to play ball because of his own secrets?

One could reasonably ask this question about Thrush’s relations with the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign.

Case in point. WikiLeaks (October 2016) released an email from Thrush to John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign manager. Thrush was writing an article that referred to Podesta. He emailed Podesta part of the draft, asking him to “fact-check” it. Astonishingly, Thrush remarked in the email:

“No worries Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u. Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this. Tell me if I fucked up anything.”

Podesta replied: “no problems here.”

Politico’s vice president of communications, Brad Dayspring, made an impassioned and transparently moronic defense of his reporter:

“Glenn is one of the top political reporters in the country [!], in no small part because he understands that it is his job to get inside information, not appear perfect when someone illegally hacks email [!]…I can speak with firsthand knowledge and experience that Glenn checks the validity of often complex reporting with everybody, on both sides of the aisle.”

So who is Brad Dayspring, the ardent defender of his “top political reporter?”

Years earlier, on October 25, 2011, while Dayspring was working as Communications Director for House Majority Leader, Eric Cantor, ADWEEK reported (link here):

“Turns out Dayspring’s personal Twitter feed, @BDayspring… follows 1,007 accounts, one of which is SexyTwitPics… Description: ‘We RT [retweet] only the HOTTEST Pics DIRECTLY from Sexy Ladies’ Twitter Accts! (No random girls, xxx, guys) Ladies Mention us w your pics! 18+’”

Maybe it’s a stretch, but I’d say the level of intelligence Dayspring exhibited in defending Glenn Thrush is matched by his interest in SexyTwitPics.

One of the elephants in the room is, of course, Bill Clinton. For several decades, people having been writing about his sexual predations. It’s assumed that he and his allies (including his wife) have been able to avoid final excommunication from politics because of their power—but it would be foolish to assume he has been free from blackmail.

We wouldn’t be talking about some reporter with a damning file on Bill Clinton. We would be talking about an agency like the CIA and their file. No one who is a serial abuser simply shrugs off the CIA and blithely walks away.

In other words, the Clintons may have nine lives precisely BECAUSE they made a deal with the devil…

power outside the matrix

(To read about Jon’s collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

21 comments on “COMPROMISED: Sex-abuser Congressmen are open to massive blackmail

  1. What kind of women do this sort of thing? I would not want anyone to KNOW that anyone had been so disrespectful. I would be too embarrassed to tell anyone, but I certainly would not cry like a child about it after years.
    I think all these women lack self respect – otherwise it would not have happened in the first place.
    Anyway, it is sickening to watch. It is all degrading for everyone concerned, ESPECIALLY women who talkabout it to the vulgar media.

  2. Eliza Ayres says:

    Reblogged this on Blue Dragon Journal and commented:
    It’s not just congressmen (and women) who have been blackmailed. It’s people at every level of society who have been blackmailed by the CIA and their cronies in the various Mafias.

    • bob klinck says:

      The hierarchical employment system in which, in order to obtain the money necessary for survival in a money economy, people have no tolerable alternative to accepting jobs that as often as not compromise their consciences is tantamount to practically universal blackmail. Despite virtually unlimited productive capacity (increasingly supplied by industrial robots), the financial independence enjoyed by the Insider class is not yet a condition society envisages for regular citizens. Atavism rules.

  3. Theodore says:

    …imagine this conversation taking place, in a car, on a lonely road outside Washington, late at night. The speakers are Congressman X and a private operative representing a covert unit inside the NSA:

    “Well, Congressman, do you remember January 6th? A Monday afternoon, a men’s room in the park off—”

    “What the hell are you talking about!”

    “A stall in the men’s room. The kid. He was wearing white high-tops. A Skins cap. T-shirt. Dark hair. Scar across his left cheek.”


    “We have very good audio and video. Anytime you want to watch it, let me know.”

    Dead silence.

    “What do you want?”

    “Right now, Congressman? We want you to come down hard on Snowden. Press it. He’s a traitor. He should tried and convicted.”

    • Jackie says:

      Why in the world would you try to blackmail a congressman if old fashioned bribes work just fine?:

      • Michael burns says:

        Because of the recent purge of…sexual unlikables…bribery is a little more difficult to prove. And bribery can almost be justified, if the one receiving, has a sick young child needing a rather expensive operation. Or a wife or mother, dying of a vicious cancer. How many of the population cheat on their taxes; is that wrong?

        Sex, especially perverted sex…on tape, pictures or video, that is the kiss of death.
        Miight as well go under the knife, change you fingerprints and move to Katmandoo.
        The sentence is loss of office, bottomless disgrace, chemical castration, broken marriage, loss of family forver possibly.

  4. Tom says:

    So why did the taxpayer(s) foot the bill? When the federal Constitution requires all public officials to obtain a surety bond before they take office. Are we saying that these politicians do not have a bond on file? Then they cannot lawfully take office and any law they helped pass is null and void. This is a serious issue. Without the surety bond on file, they perjured their oath to office and cannot lawfully be in office. I suggest we do a FOIA on a few, as a sample, and you will be surprised what turns up. If we want to do something about this BS going on, this is a good start. A very basic principal of law – enforce the Constitution.

    • elliottjab says:

      Good – this is very good.

    • JB says:

      “The practical difficulty with our government has been, that most of those who have
      administered it, have taken it for granted that the Constitution, as it is written, was a thing
      of no importance; that it neither said what it meant, nor meant what it said; that it was
      gotten up by swindlers, (as many of its authors doubtless were,) who said a great many
      good things, which they did not mean, and meant a great many bad things, which they
      dared not say; that these men, under the false pretence of a government resting on the
      consent of the whole people, designed to entrap them into a government of a part; who
      should be powerful and fraudulent enough to cheat the weaker portion out of all the good
      things that were said, but not meant, and subject them to all the bad things that were meant,
      but not said. And most of those who have administered the government, have assumed that
      all these swindling intentions were to be carried into effect, in the place of the written

      “It is not improbable that many or most of the worst of governments — although
      established by force, and by a few, in the first place— come, in time, to be supported by a
      majority. But if they do, this majority is composed, in large part, of the most ignorant,
      superstitious, timid, dependent, servile, and corrupt portions of the people; of those who
      have been over-awed by the power, intelligence, wealth, and arrogance; of those who have
      been deceived by the frauds; and of those who have been corrupted by the inducements, of
      the few who really constitute the government.” –Lysander Spooner

      Enforcing the Constitution only promotes the present condition because that is what it was designed to do.

  5. From Quebec says:

    Get rid of the whole shebang.

    HOW can it be done?

    – Start with term limits. 8 years would be enough for Senator and Congressmen, just like it is for Presidents.

    – Completely remove political lobbying from governments

    – When a new President takes office, kick out all the leftovers remaining in powerful positions of the outgoing President. .

    – Get rid of the MSM Fake News.

    -Investigate The CIA, FBI and all the others Alphabet agencies including the Federal ,Reserve. .

    In other words: DRAIN THE SWAMP.

  6. Reblogged this on John Barleycorn and commented:
    Excellent point

  7. Smedley Butler says:

    Unless this congressman copyrighted the selfie. I don’t see how he has a leg to stand on claiming releasing the picture is breaking the law.

  8. Unfortunately the wilful imaginations of a small percentage of the public have been always to turn assumption into presumption and fact without any hard evidence.

    The voice of the accuser or the denier sweetest?

    Whichever one is judged “wins”.

    People have forgotten there is only violation or consenting partnership. “Abuse” is the hip “generality” of the age. I wrote these two articles to inspire stimulative thought – thinking “outside the box” (or some would say, “there’s thinking ‘outside the box’ – outside that is ‘Ozzie Thinker thinking'”):


  9. Paul says:

    Weinstein’s fall seems to be a case in point. It can be correlated with cancellation of a project with Oliver Stone which was to be on the topic of Guantanomo Bay. No one in the alternative media seems to have picked up this connection. Why was Weinstein brought down? There may be many reasons, but the triggering reason was surely that it was considered important to block that project.

    • maidinamerica says:

      And a vaccine documentary with Robert DeNiro.

      • Rampton says:

        There was something what caused Harvey to be thrown under the bus by the NYT, which itself killed the story years earlier. He obidiently kissed asses when it came to Guantanamo and vaccines films. I speculate he tried to masturbate in front of a wrong woman one day, and she had friends in higher places.

  10. Wayne pacific says:

    Mr. Rappoport,

    Bill and Hillary are both CIA members themselves. They were recruited by Richard Sterns, back in the late 1960’s. “Ric” was a vice president of the National Student Association, which was outed as a CIA front organization. One of Clinton’s first appointments was to make Richard Sterns Federal District Judge in Massachusetts. Check it out, and you will have a great, great story. The best of the 21st century.

  11. Wayne pacific says:

    PS: Sterns was, among other things, the west coast campaign manager of McGovern’s failed Presidential campaign. I would make a strong wager that he had a big hand in advising McGovern to to select Eagleton and then exposed his psychiatric shock treatment history.

    By the way, surely you must know that the the MSM is CIA and Mossad, which don’t always see eye to eye.

  12. maidinamerica says:

    In the book “Clinton Cash”, by Peter Schweizer, he notes that an NBC reporter asks Bill that if Hillary is elected will he continue to make speeches. And he said, “Oh yeah, I’ve gotta pay our bills.” I’m thinking, “Wha-a-t bills?.. O…Yeah…Bribery, Blackmail,..O and now without immediate access to government employees at hand to do their dirty work they would need mafia hit men employees to retain on the payroll. And to think as average John Q Public’s spending power decreases, Hill and Bill would at least have tax-free arrangements with their back room deals, under the table transfers, and quid-pro-quos. But that would still be a huge.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *