UK, Netherlands: wrong sperm, three parents, ultimate agenda

UK, Netherlands scandals: wrong sperm, three parents, ultimate agenda

by Jon Rappoport

July 3, 2017

Sperm bank mix-up of sperm samples; DNA from three people to produce a baby. What’s going on?

In 2016, as dw.com reports: “A Dutch medical center has launched an investigation after uncovering that dozens of women may have been fertilized by the wrong sperm. Half of the women who underwent IVF [in vitro fertilization] treatment are pregnant or had their babies.”

“The University Medical Center in Utrecht (UMC) said on Tuesday that a ‘procedural error’ may have caused up to 26 women to be fertilized with the wrong sperm cells at its IVF treatment laboratory.”

Also in 2016, as dw.com reports: “Three-parent IVF techniques have been declared safe enough by British scientists to be offered in ‘specific circumstances.’ The treatments can reduce the risk of mothers passing hereditary diseases to their babies.”

“The treatment is known as ‘three-parent’ IVF because the babies, born from genetically modified embryos, would have DNA from a mother, a father and from a female donor.”

And now we have this emerging scandal in the Netherlands: A sperm bank owner in Rotterdam, Jan Karbat, who died two months ago, is being accused of secretly fathering dozens of children. According to 23 families, Karbat switched sperm samples and substituted his own for the donors’.

As grisly as these scandals and practices are, they are mere covers for a much deeper agenda: making conception, pregnancy, and birth AN INCREASINGLY SYNTHETIC PROCESS.

Here’s another factor (summarized in the Daily Beast). In 2011, the European Science Foundation reported that 20% of European men, between the ages of 18 and 25, are “sub-fertile.” Not only that, both sperm count and sperm effectiveness have been falling since 1960.

The Daily Beast article goes on to highlight research indicating that bisphenol-A (BPA), “found in hard plastic items like food containers, could tinker with reproduction because it’s an estrogen-like ‘endocrine disruptor’…Men with the highest levels of BPA in their urine had 23 percent lower sperm concentrations than did men with the lowest exposure to BPA.”

The deeper you drill into this whole issue, the clearer the outlines become. Behind the scandals and bizarre practices, the population is being conditioned to accept all forms of synthetic conception, pregnancy, and birth.

We are approaching the day when these natural events will be laboratory-type processes. “It’s best and safest for everyone that the experts handle human reproduction.”

In other words, the scandals are a limited hangout: confess to errors and mistakes and even crimes, as a way of making the deeper story go away. Admit a fragment of the truth, and conceal the rest.

If the public believes the whole process of giving birth, from the beginning, from conception, is fraught with problems, they will look for security and safety. They will look toward scientists “who have all the answers.” And those answers, more and more, will entail artificial and synthetic processes of conception, fertilization, and DNA tinkering.

The nuclear family? An outmoded notion.

Into the dustbin of history.

The inclination is to say, “Well, if enough scandals surrounding synthetic conception and birth are brought to light, the public and the authorities will demand a return to natural practices.” It’s counter-intuitive to imagine these scandals will drive the public into the arm of scientists for answers and guidance. But that’s the way it’s working out.

What has to happen is an awakening from the basic trance, in which all official science is considered a god.

Then people can think and look for themselves.

And one of things they can think about is the degree to which they want the birth of their children to become a technocratic institution for a Brave New World.

Substitute-sperm from an anonymous donor’s bank-deposit to impregnate a future mother? Combining and engineering the DNA from three or more donors, in order to produce an embryo? These are steps along the path to Huxley’s dystopia:

“Hot tunnels alternated with cool tunnels. Coolness was wedded to discomfort in the form of hard X-rays. By the time they were decanted the embryos had a horror of cold. They were predestined to emigrate to the tropics, to be miner[s] and acetate silk spinners and steel workers. Later on their minds would be made to endorse the judgment of their bodies. ‘We condition them to thrive on heat’, concluded Mr. Foster. ‘Our colleagues upstairs will teach them to love it’.”


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

13 comments on “UK, Netherlands: wrong sperm, three parents, ultimate agenda

  1. krys says:

    As usual, your column is both precise and prophetic. Far too many soft-headed people these days almost look upon the skill of deliberate and focused thought as a chose to be avidly avoided.

  2. Jennifer says:

    The problem now is when you enter into this discussion you have to begin with the push to make our men homosexual which started with the military men in the Korean War who were fed beef fattened with female hormone, and which was why Europe would not accept our meat for a time. Stilbestrol was used to fatten chickens until the Delaney Commission put an end to that when it was discovered that mink fed chicken entrails full of stilbestrol became homosexual and the mink did not reproduce. Roxarzone was then used to feed chicken, which has arsenic in it, which is also estrogenic, but growers were getting ill from it and then it was stopped, mostly. If you ate the chicken wings you were especially at risk being the poison pooled there perhaps because it was the less used part of the chicken by the chicken. Many more endocrine disrupters now.

    Then you create the problem of setting our men up to change by getting the good fats and cholesterol out of the diet by following faulty research like with Ancel Keyes; fats which were needed to make the sex hormones like testosterone. Then the food pyramid was put into play with carbohydrates at the top and sugar was prevalent which depletes the choline, leaving the male body with less to make the necessary lecithin which brings the cholesterol into the body from the blood. Lack of choline also leads to lack of acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter, needed to jump the gap in the nerve cells in the brain, and which is also needed to make other neurotransmitters like dopamine, which the lack thereof has been linked to alcohol and drug addiction, and depression and othr “psychiatric ills”.

    Japans Celibacy Syndrone is probably caused by endocrine disrupters, and change of the light hitting the eye because of cell phone use, but a friend went there and adopted a diet which was popular there, no fat, no cholesterol, and when he became so fatigued he couldn’t work, he went to the doctor who told him to return to his normal diet. So, those in Japan are being set up for a fall as has happened to us.

    My late husband would wake up very mad because often his dreams were about accepting male homosexuality as being okay. He knew that leaving male homosexuality unchecked could lead to the annihilation of the human race, and he didn’t like it that these thoughts were being projected during his sleep when his defenses were down and he found himself accepting it. Edison’s device which he thought picked up on the thoughts of the dead, was really a device which picked up on thoughts of the living, and someone turned it around to make it a weapon, to broadcast thoughts we might pick up on and accept.

    “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.” Hosea

  3. TrishWriter says:

    As an adoptee, I have researched the adoption industry, an industry in which genetic strangers are given babies. We’re talking babies who have mothers–not orphans. This practice increased greatly after World War II. The excuses for taking the babies were often that the moms were too young or unmarried. Now, this genetic switching includes babies who grow in the rented wombs of a surrogate. I had fabulous adoptive parents, but the genetic longing, the desire to be with my natural family, left a void that can never be filled. I became fascinated by the way that reproduction is addressed in Brave New World. I think we are moving toward that society, unless we stop the way that science is being forced to triumph over nature. When my oldest child was a baby, around 16 years ago, I took a writing class at a university in Los Angeles. Out of the twelve or so people in the class, almost all seemed to favor government licensing to have a child. Putting something in the water to stop fertility until a license would be granted seemed fine with most of the students. Thank you, Jon, for being brave enough to tackle this difficult but important subject.

  4. From Quebec says:

    What else can you expect from peoples who create Human-Pig Hybrid in the Lab?

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/01/human-pig-hybrid-embryo-chimera-organs-health-science/

    • Jennifer says:

      What the majority of us do not understand is that the female ovum of any species will accept the spermatozoa of any male of any species if it is out of the body. Her body protects her ovum. Don’t know how it accomplishes this, but this is how they create abominations like the human/pig.

      • Theodore says:

        Thanks for stating that. I did not know that but that makes sense now that you’ve stated it.

  5. JB says:

    The notion of a “nuclear family” is a modern construction of the industrial age. In the previous century the movement away from the compact family which had lost their traditional wide-ranging connections and associations began taking form. Prior to the industrial age families were extended, and marriage was primarily consummated for economic and influential reasons. It was the Kabbalists of the late 16th century who extended the Jewish concept of family to extend beyond the grave.

    “Socialists and feminists such as Henrietta Rodman called for radical
    changes to the nuclear family, with communal kitchens and housing arrangements
    freeing women from household drudgery. Charlotte Perkins Gilman
    paved the way for almost a hundred years of nail biting about what women’s
    rights activists really want with her 1915 novel Herland, where women live
    and raise children entirely without men’s assistance.” -Stephanie Coontz, Marriage, A History

    As for human gene splicing, the Sumerian tablets so far translated indicate attempts at genetic manipulation and artificial insemination far in excess of 6,000 years ago. Genetic manipulation shows up in agriculture as well as in human species.

Comments are closed.