Bombshell: CDC destroyed vaccine documents, Congressman reveals; CDC whistleblower case is back
by Jon Rappoport
July 31, 2015
“…the [CDC] co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the [MMR vaccine] study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can.” (William Thompson, CDC researcher)
On July 29, US Congressman Bill Posey made his last stand on the floor of the House. Granted five minutes to speak, he laid bare the lying of the CDC in a now-famous 2004 study that exonerated the MMR vaccine and claimed it had no connection to autism.
“No connection to autism” was the lie.
Congressman Posey read a statement from long-time CDC researcher William Thompson, one of the authors of the 2004 Pediatrics study designed to determine, once and for all, whether the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine could cause autism.
Thompson saw and participated in violating the protocol of the study. He was there. He helped his co-authors destroy documents that would have shown an MMR-autism link.
You can see a rush transcript of Congressman Posey’s remarks here (on the ageofautism.com website), which includes his reading of a statement from whistleblower Thompson.
Posey pleads with his colleagues for a Congressional investigation.
Of note: two of the CDC researchers on the infamous 2004 study, who according to Thompson, destroyed vital documents, are Coleen Boyle and Frank DeStefano. They are both high-ranking executives at the CDC in the area of vaccine safety.
This calls into question every single CDC study, under their tenure, that claims vaccines are safe.
CDC whistleblower Thompson’s statement, which Posey read on the House floor, includes this bombshell:
“However, because I [Thompson] assumed it [destroying the documents] was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office and I retained all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final draft of the Pediatrics paper.”
Thompson has the smoking-gun documents. So does Congressman Posey. I believe others do as well.
So: publish them. Publish them now.
There are lawsuits to be filed. Eleven years have passed since the CDC committed its crime of concealing the MMR vaccine-autism connection. How many parents, never informed of the truth, have permitted their children to receive this vaccine? How many children have been struck down by the vaccine?
The lawsuits should be filed against the CDC and the individual authors of the 2004 study. Lawyers must depose every CDC employee who had knowledge of the crime.
And what about the fact that the MMR vaccine is one of the shots that has been mandated, by law, in California, in other states, and in Australia? Mandating neurological destruction of children is a crime that must be investigated and punished. If these states (and other countries) insist on keeping the MMR on their schedules, they are guilty parties.
Here, for background, are earlier articles I wrote about whistleblower Thompson, starting when the story broke in the summer of 2014.
Understand what we are dealing with here, in terms of public exposure: the author of a peer-reviewed and published study; the author who has worked for many years at the CDC; the author who participated in destruction of vital documents; the author has come forward and admitted his crime and the crime of his colleagues. This kind of confession never happens.
But it did happen.
And this story and what it means must not die, no matter how major media outlets try to spin it or ignore it.
Parents who are, in ignorance, allowing their children to receive the MMR vaccine, must be informed. They must know what is going on. They must know the danger to their children.
Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, Germany, France, India, China, South Africa…wherever the MMR vaccine is given…parents must be made aware they’re gambling with their children’s lives.
Government officials anywhere in the world who make this continuing crime possible are liable.
So are manufacturers of the MMR.
Get busy. Expose the truth.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
Since the documents remain unpublished, let us hope William Thompson has disseminated them to trustworthy people far and wide; it is becoming more and more evident that certain agencies are not beyond enlisting expert services to perform a sophisticated hit.
Exceptional work, Jon! I have been very busy with the Planned Parenthood deception and other matters gaining the attention of various Senators and Congressmen but saw this and wanted to add something.
Dr. Jeff Bradstreet’s death was very suspicious about how he supposedly committed suicide by shooting himself in the chest. Why such a painful awkward way instead of a simple injection or other overdose? Anyway since he blew the whistle on vaccinations and their connection to Autism I became suspicious. Then I saw this excellent article from Before it’s News written by Lisa Haven and wow it sure looks like a conspiracy to me. Here I will let you decide:
http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2015/07/8-dead-5-missing-you-wont-believe-what-they-knew-who-they-encountered-and-why-they-were-targeted-a-tie-no-one-has-made-2470938.html
Anyway Jon, on behalf of my Daughter and Grandchildren I thank you for all your work on this and hopefully the truth will come out and put a stop to yet another ploy to take more lives as the Elite have been doing for some time now!
Reblogged this on EbolaInfo and commented:
…the author of a peer-reviewed and published study; the author who has worked for many years at the CDC; the author who participated in destruction of vital documents; the author has come forward and admitted his crime and the crime of his colleagues
FIRST MONSANTO NOW THE CDC THANKS JON !
Thank you, Jon,
I sent the info far and wide!
BEFORE 1973,it was a crime to kill children in america,THE BIBLE clearly states IF YOU HARM MY LITTLE ONES,but we’re talking about america who kills children,lies to them in their schools,THE POLICE GANGS kill them anytime they want,as does the government in experimental labs all over the USA,the children are bought and sold by DCF,for child sex traficing,and you think anyone in america will do anything to these DEMONS at the CDC….I highly doubt it…BUT WATCH WHAT THE LORD DOES TO AMERICA FOR IT……….
Parents, we need to be vigilant in the community and by making trips to our representatives in reminding them relentlessly, that the CDC, not only lied in their vaccine heavy metal / chemical and viral poisoning of children (A.K.A. Autism) studies but, that the CDC in fact got caught in destroying the damning evidence.
The ‘criminal’ CDC can not be allowed to dictate to the rest of us what goes into our own bodies.
NEVER let up!
Good work Jon!
After years of being castigated and ridiculed by John Q. Public, and government establishment, now the informed and educated scientists, physicians, and parents across this country are FINALLY vindicated. The phrase, “I told you so” comes to mind. I cannot even imagine the blowback/threats this man (Mr. Thompson) and his family are receiving for telling the truth. Mr. Thompson was not willing to sweep the truth under the rug any longer. At some point he got tired of the lies/manipulations of it all, and decided to follow his conscience. Wow. Very, very few people are as brave as this man, for he will indeed be giving up EVERYTHING he holds dear in order to expose the truth/lies. I will pray that this man survive this whole ordeal, with support and encouragement from his loved ones. Mr. Thompson, you are a HERO. Many, many lives may be saved because of what you are doing. Stay strong and never give in. Our prayers are with you.
Published in German at: https://farsight3.wordpress.com/2015/07/31/erneuter-wissenschaftsbetrug-der-impf-pharma/
Excellent work.
Charlie is 18 yo c Down Syn who was on track 6 yr ago to achieve some indep functions, reaching milestones including develop expressive communication, feeding self solid food, but most importantly he had a beautiful and gentle spirit, smiley and happy.
All that is gone now. My son is in total care 24/7, angry, violent, anxious, frustrated, eats baby food and has never had a friend, or a personal visit.
We pulled him from public school when he started acting out and only subsequently did we learn of his being abused by other violent kids in special ed. Only other significant event was his MMR vac prior to the onset of his initial decompensation.
Charlie now has all major clinical features found within the Autism spectrum. If it be true that vac’s, in general, have become the elite’s delivery system for culling the herd (I strongly suspect it is), the personal woe’s of judgment sure to descend from the throne room of Almighty God will be unspeakable. As it is written, so shall it be done!
My own position is for minimal, safe and effective vaccination. In this regard I am arguing that parents and other individuals should be informed that, according to manufacturers’ data, most seronegative individuals are likely to be immune after the first effective dose of live measles, mumps and rubella vaccine.
According to information provided by MMR vaccine manufacturer Merck, most seronegative individuals are likely to be immune after the first dose of live MMR vaccine. However, a second dose is mandated in most US states. The reason for this second dose is to cover the small proportion of individuals who might not respond to the first dose. It is my argument that people should not be compelled to have an arbitrary second dose of MMR vaccine for their children, and that they should be offered the option of an antibody titre test to verify immunisation after the first dose.
There is a precedent for parents being informed of the option of antibody titre testing before the second dose of live MMR vaccine.
In the state of New Jersey the health department provides information on antibody titre testing. The Antibody Titer Law (Holly’s Law) allows parents to seek testing to determine a child’s immunity to measles, mumps and rubella before receiving the second dose of MMR vaccine. A brochure about The Antibody Titer Law is accessible via this link: http://www.state.nj.us/health/cd/documents/antibody_titer_law.pdf
The law was enacted in response to the death of five year old Holly Marie Stavola who died of encephalopathy which she developed seven days after receiving her second dose of MMR vaccine. Holly’s family campaigned for this law, wishing they had known about the option of the antibody titre test before Holly’s arbitrary revaccination with the second dose of live MMR vaccine.
It is my contention that all parents should be informed about the option of antibody titre testing before the arbitrary second dose of live MMR vaccine, but this is not happening.
‘Vaccine hesitant’ parents in particular may be keen to minimise vaccine interventions for their children to reduce the risk of adverse reactions, and may be willing to pay for an antibody titre test themselves, rather than have an arbitrary second dose of live MMR vaccine.
For further background see my letter to Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services challenging the government mandated second dose of Merck measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) live vaccine. My letter to Secretary Burwell can be accessed via this link:http://users.on.net/~peter.hart/Letter_to_Sylvia_Mathews_Burwell_HHS_re_MMR_second_dose.pdf In particular, consider my argument that the blanket ‘recommendation’ for two doses of live MMR vaccine contravenes the Authorizing Legislation of the US National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, Sec. 300aa-26.
According to the Information Sheet for Merck’s M-M-R II (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine Live) “clinical studies of 284 triple seronegative children, 11 months to 7 years of age, demonstrated that M-M-R II is highly immunogenic and generally well tolerated. In these studies, a single injection of the vaccine induced measles hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibodies in 95%, mumps neutralizing antibodies in 96%, and rubella HI antibodies in 99% of susceptible persons.”(1)
No reference to published details of the “clinical studies of 284 triple seronegative children” is provided in Merck’s M-M-R II Information Sheet. However, the ACIP report on MMR vaccination appears to support Merck’s information re the high seroconversion rate after primary vaccination, particularly in regards to the measles and rubella components of the MMR vaccine, (although there appears to be some ambiguity about the effectiveness of the mumps component of the MMR vaccine). The ACIP’s report on MMR vaccination also admits that: “The second dose of measles-containing vaccine primarily was intended to induce immunity in the small percentage of persons who did not seroconvert after vaccination with the first dose of vaccine (primary vaccine failure).”(2)
Given that most children are likely to be immunised after the first dose of effective live MMR vaccine, I question whether parents are being given the opportunity to properly give their ‘informed consent’ to the second dose of live MMR vaccine, also often described as a ‘booster’.(3) This question is particularly pertinent as adverse events have been reported after MMR vaccination. The VAERS database contains reports of children of four years and over who have experienced adverse events after vaccination with the MMR vaccine. The case of Holly Stavola, who died of encephalopathy which she developed seven days after receiving her second dose of MMR vaccine (and referred to in my previous comment), is a very sad example of an adverse event after vaccination.
References:
1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. M-M-R® II. (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine Live). Information Sheet: http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf
2. Prevention of Measles, Rubella, Congenital Rubella Syndrome, and Mumps, 2013. Summary Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Vol. 62, No.4. June 14, 2013:http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6204.pdf
3. For example, in the article “Does my child still need a booster shot if a blood test shows that he’s already immune to a disease?”, authored by Paul Offit and published on the babycenter website, the second dose of MMR vaccine is inappropriately described as a ‘booster’:http://www.babycenter.com/404_does-my-child-still-need-a-booster-shot-if-a-blood-test-show_1463679.bc
In my first comment on this thread I note that I have forwarded a letter to Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, suggesting that failing to provide information about antibody titre testing in relation to live MMR vaccination contravenes the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Authorizing Legislation Sec. 300aa-26.
My letter to Secretary Burwell can be accessed via this link:http://users.on.net/~peter.hart/Letter_to_Sylvia_Mathews_Burwell_HHS_re_MMR_second_dose.pdf
In response to my letter, I received an email from Pamela J. Cox, PhD, MA, Director, Division of the Executive Secretariat, Office of the Chief of Staff, CDC.
In her email response Dr Cox said: “Dear Ms Hart: Thank you for your e-mail to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia M. Burwell questioning the mandated second dose of Merck MMR live vaccine. Secretary Burwell shared your message with the appropriate subject matter experts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for review, and Ms. Candace [sic] Swartwood is pleased to provide you with the attached response. We appreciate you taking the initiative to voice your opinion and to share your ideas. Please accept our best wishes.”
I find the letter from Ms Swartwood to be most interesting, and I am considering my response.
As this is a matter of public interest, and in the interests of transparency and accountability, I’ve published the letter from Candice Swartwood, Deputy Associate Director for Policy, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, on the internet and it can be accessed via this link: http://users.on.net/~peter.hart/MMRdosage_prepared_for_Elizabeth_Hart.pdf
Re the Antibody Titer Law (Holly’s Law) re measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination, referred to in my first comment.
This law was passed in 2004 in response to the death of five year old Holly Marie Stavola who died of encephalopathy which she developed seven days after receiving her second dose of MMR vaccine. Holly’s family campaigned for this law, wishing they had known about the option of the antibody titre test before Holly’s arbitrary revaccination with the second dose of live MMR vaccine.
On the HopeFromHolly website, Holly’s parent Robin Stavola says: “I served on the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as a parent of a vaccine injured child. We were compensated by the government for death. My family and I hope that Holly’s story will make a difference and help you realize that you must be aware of the benefits and risks of vaccinations for your child just as you make yourself aware of the benefits and risks of any medical procedure. We, unfortunately, were not educated in the area of vaccinations and because of this were not able to help the medical people help our daughter Holly. The reason we would like to tell Holly’s story is because we think other parents, as well as doctors, should know the truth and become educated about vaccinations.” http://hopefromholly.com/blog/our-purpose/
The Antibody Titer Law brochure is available via this link: http://www.state.nj.us/health/cd/documents/antibody_titer_law.pdf
I suggest it is unethical to withhold information on the option of antibody titre testing after MMR vaccination from parents and others individuals.
In regards to the highly publicised measles outbreak in California, the CDC reports:
“Among the 110 California patients, 49 (45%) were unvaccinated; five (5%) had 1 dose of measles-containing vaccine, seven (6%) had 2 doses, one (1%) had 3 doses, 47 (43%) had unknown or undocumented vaccination status, and one (1%) had immunoglobulin G seropositivity documented, which indicates prior vaccination or measles infection at an undetermined time. Twelve of the unvaccinated patients were infants too young to be vaccinated. Among the 37 remaining vaccine-eligible patients, 28 (67%) were intentionally unvaccinated because of personal beliefs, and one was on an alternative plan for vaccination. Among the 28 intentionally unvaccinated patients, 18 were children (aged <18 years), and 10 were adults. Patients range in age from 6 weeks to 70 years; the median age is 22 years. Among the 84 patients with known hospitalization status, 17 (20%) were hospitalized.”(1)
So 13 people vaccinated with a measles-containing vaccine came down with measles. (And there may have been more in the group of unknown or undocumented vaccination status.)
It appears two doses of measles vaccine, or even three, does not guarantee immunity for all. It would be interesting to know more about the people who had multiple doses of measles vaccine, e.g. how old they are, exactly how old they were when they were vaccinated, and what brand of vaccine was used (presumably Merck M-M-R II if they were born in the US).
I’d also be interested to know how the 10 unvaccinated adults fared, as I understand the effects of measles can be more serious in older individuals; and some details of the deleterious effects that resulted in at least 17 people being hospitalized.
Could there be a problem with the measles vaccine, a la the mumps component of the Merck M-M-R II, which is currently the subject of lawsuits in the US, ie: “Lawsuits claiming Merck lied about mumps vaccine efficacy headed to trial” http://www.fiercevaccines.com/story/lawsuits-claiming-merck-lied-about-mumps-vaccine-efficacy-headed-trial/2014-09-09
Reference:
1. Measles Outbreak – California, December 2014-February 2015. CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), February 20, 2015 / 64(06); 153-154: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6406a5.htm?s_cid=mm6406a5_w
I’m sorry…but I can’t trust ANY information, let alone statistical info, from the CDC. How do we REALLY know that the vast majority, if not all of the infected patients, were vaccinated?. How do we REALLY know if it was even the measles virus or some other viral or bacterial infection? The CDC could have very well orchestrated this incident as the impetus of a fear-mongering campaign to mandatory immunization targeted at the most populous state in the country. Sadly, it had the desired outcome with SB277 being passed and signed into law. And unfortunately, as California goes…so does the rest of the nation.
The CDC is nothing more than a fraudulent operation very proficient in disinformation, (e.g., manipulation of data & stats), fear-mongering and propaganda. I’m sure Dr. William Thompson is just revealing the “tip of the iceberg” of the BS that goes on there! And sadly, so many physicians are mind-controlled by the CDC, idolizing the agency as some sacred holy temple or something.
And for all the “vaccinated” who are terrified of the “unvaccinated,” I hear the CDC has on sale left over hazmat suits from the Ebola scare.
well said. thank you.
I understand the reason children under 12 months or so do not generally have measles vaccination is because they are likely to have passive immunity from their mothers, i.e. maternally derived antibodies.
The CDC MMWR report I quoted earlier notes: “Twelve of the unvaccinated patients were infants too young to be vaccinated.”(1)
So it seems likely that these 12 patients were vulnerable in the tricky period when maternally derived antibodies wane, before vaccination around 12-15 months.
It appears to me there is much uncertainty about the duration of maternally derived antibodies, and optimum timing for vaccination. This is likely to vary between individuals and depend upon factors such as whether the mother was vaccinated or unvaccinated, and breast-feeding. (I don’t claim to have any expertise in this area, but I’m interested to learn more about the effect and duration of maternally derived antibodies, for both humans and animals.)
See for example Waaijenborg et al: “…Infants typically receive the first dose of vaccine around the first year of age. Maternally derived antibodies provide the primary protection for infants prior to this first vaccine dose. The initial concentration of maternal antibodies in a newborn is highly correlated with the antibody concentration in the mother. Subsequently, there is waning of the maternal antibody levels in the infant, leaving the child susceptible to infections. Optimal timing of the first dose of vaccine can contribute to keeping this period as short as possible. This is important because, among European infants aged <1 year, measles risk and severity are greater than the risk and severity among those aged ≥ 1 year. The optimal timing of the first MMR vaccine dose depends on 2 main factors. First, the infant’s immune system should be sufficiently mature to respond to the vaccine antigens. Second, levels of maternal antibodies must be low enough to ensure that they do not neutralize the live, attenuated strains in the vaccine. Insight in the kinetics and determinants of maternal antibody concentrations is therefore very important.”(2)
In the CDC MMWR measles outbreak report it’s also interesting to note that: “Patients range in age from 6 weeks to 70 years…” It would be useful to have more information on the cases at the extremes of the age range, e.g. why wasn’t a 6 week old baby protected by passive immunity, and why did a 70 year old (whom one might presume would be immune) succumb to measles, and how badly were these individuals affected?
References:
1. Measles Outbreak – California, December 2014-February 2015. CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), February 20, 2015 / 64(06); 153-154:http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6406a5.htm?s_cid=mm6406a5_w
2. Waaijenborg, Sandra et al. Waning of Maternal Antibodies Against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella in Communities With Contrasting Vaccination Coverage. Journal of Infectious Diseases Advance Access, published May 8 2013:http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/04/29/infdis.jit143.long
Yes….quite a bombshell and thanks Jon for keeping us apprised of this incident.
After watching Congressman Posey’s presentation on the House floor (CSPAN tape), I thought this is serious stuff. I tuned in to some of the alphabet soup mainstream media outlets and all they were mostly covering was the Tom.Brady incident ad nauseam. A football player allegedly destroying cell phone evidence in a non-criminal football “deflation” case. Now, here’s a senior CDC scientist admitting to being part of a fraudulent vaccine study and witnessing the destruction of evidence in a potential criminal case – and we hear nothing from the media! What a wonderful set of priorities the media has. A story like this on national media could be a HUGH game changer. Millions and millions of people would finally be awaken with respite – the DOJ might have to actually open an investigation.
Interestingly, the imperious “science blogs” are on major damage control on this one. They’re undermining the situation as having no evidence of any wrongdoing (?), and have gone as far as saying that the “only” reason Rep. Posey did this is because he receives funding from anti-vax groups. Talk about mind-control on steroids with these people. They seem so dumbfounded that the “sacred temple” they call the CDC could actually be implicated in a fraudulent vaccine study that subsequently destroyed valuable evidence (the pristine CDC wouldn’t do that now…would they?).
Now if the mainstream media will step-up to the plate and do what’s right for the integrity of investigative reporting (imagine that). Maybe Bill O’Reilly can help out? After all, isn’t he “looking out for us?”
Reblogged this on Homeopathyginatyler's Blog and commented:
There are lawsuits to be filed. Eleven years have passed since the CDC committed its crime of concealing the MMR vaccine-autism connection. How many parents, never informed of the truth, have permitted their children to receive this vaccine? How many children have been struck down by the vaccine?
The lawsuits should be filed against the CDC and the individual authors of the 2004 study. Lawyers must depose every CDC employee who had knowledge of the crime.
read the article now…….its important for every parent
Email Rep. Jason Chaffetz’s office, because he is the Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Urge him to have a hearing! Email […] to voice your concerns!!!