The invention of political reality
by Jon Rappoport
October 31, 2014
From the 2010 Rockefeller Foundation brainstorming exercise “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” (pages 18 – 19) (note: this is a .pdf document at rockefellerfoundation.org. Go to startpage.com and type-in the title to access the document):
“In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit… national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”
As you read this article, keep in mind that the Rockefeller Empire is very much a medical empire.
The Rockefeller Foundation, along with the Carnegie Foundation, changed the course of modern medicine, reinventing it as a global pharmaceutical colossus, whose rationale was: kill germs.
Therefore, every so-called viral epidemic, hyped to the hilt, assists in the promotion of the germ as the invisible terrorist, thereby reinforcing toxic medical drugs as the only answer for humankind.
Every phony epidemic also helps to engender a larger and tighter medical surveillance system for the world—much like a medical NSA.
The infamous Trilateral Commission (TC) still exists.
Many people think the TC, created in 1973 by David Rockefeller, is a relic of an older time.
Think again.
Patrick Wood, author of Trilaterals Over Washington, points out there are only 87 members of the Trilateral Commission who live in America. Obama appointed eleven of them to posts in his administration.
The original stated goal of the TC was to create “a new international economic order.” Knowing that you have to break eggs to make an omelette, consider how the following TC members, in key Obama posts, can help engender national chaos, and install binding international agreements that will envelop our economy and money in a deeper global collective: a new world order:
* Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary;
* James Jones, National Security Advisor;
* Paul Volker, Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee;
* Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence.
All Trilateralists.
In the run-up to his inauguration after the 2008 presidential election, Obama was tutored by the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski.
In the US, since 1973, author Wood counts eight out of 10 US Trade Representative appointments, and six out of eight World Bank presidencies, as American Trilateral members.
Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote, four years before birthing the TC with his godfather, David Rockefeller:
“[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state.”
Several other noteworthy Trilateral members: George HW Bush; Bill Clinton; Dick Cheney; Al Gore. The first three men helped sink the US further into debt by fomenting wars abroad; and Gore’s cap and trade blueprint would destroy industrial economies, while vastly increasing the numbers of people in Third World countries who have no access to modern sources of energy.
Does all this offer a clue as to why the US economy has failed to recover from the Wall Street debacle of 2008, why the federal bailout was a handout to super-rich criminals, and why Obama took actions which prevented a recovery? (Does it also offer a clue about why we are seeing the ferocious promotion of a phony Ebola epidemic?)
A closer look at Tim Geithner’s circle of economic advisers reveals the chilling Trilateral effect: Paul Volker; Alan Greenspan; E. Gerald Corrigan (director, Goldman Sachs); and Peter G Peterson (former CEO, Lehman Brothers, former chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations). These men are all Trilateral members.
How many foxes in the hen house do we need, before we realize their Trilateral agenda is controlling the direction of our economy?
The TC has no interest in building up the American economy. They want to torpedo it, as part of the end-game of creating a new international currency, ushering in a de facto Globalist management system for the whole planet.
Any doubt on the question of TC goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, the founder of the TC, in his Memoirs (2003):
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
Even in what many people mistakenly think of as the TC’s heyday, the 1970s, there were few who realized its overarching power.
Here is a close-up snap shot of a remarkable moment from out of the past. It’s a through-the-looking-glass secret—in the form of a conversation between a reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper. The interview took place in 1978. It concerned the issue of who exactly, during President Carter’s administration, was formulating US economic and political policy.
The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser and Cooper is astonishing. It’s as if they’re saying, “What we’re revealing is already out in the open, it’s too late to do anything about it, why are you so worked up, we’ve already won…”
NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of [Trilateral] representatives of the US, UK, West Germany, Japan, France and the EEC is coordinating the economic and political policies of the Trilateral countries [which would include the US]?
COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.
NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this [Trilateral] committee should remain informal because to formalize ‘this function might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and other countries which do not take part.’ Who are you afraid of?
KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral] meetings.
COOPER: Many people still live in a world of separate nations, and they would resent such coordination [of policy].
NOVAK: But this [Trilateral] committee is essential to your whole policy. How can you keep it a secret or fail to try to get popular support [for its decisions on how Trilateral member nations will conduct their economic and political policies]?
COOPER: Well, I guess it’s the press’ job to publicize it.
NOVAK: Yes, but why doesn’t President Carter come out with it and tell the American people that [US] economic and political power is being coordinated by a [Trilateral] committee made up of Henry Owen and six others? After all, if [US] policy is being made on a multinational level, the people should know.
COOPER: President Carter and Secretary of State Vance have constantly alluded to this in their speeches.
KAISER: It just hasn’t become an issue.
SOURCE: “Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management,” ed. by Holly Sklar, 1980. South End Press, Boston. Pages 192-3.
Of course, although Kaiser and Cooper claimed the Trilateral takeover of US domestic and foreign policy was already out in the open, it wasn’t.
Their interview slipped under the mainstream media radar, which is to say, it was ignored and buried. It didn’t become a scandal on the level of, say, Watergate, although its essence was far larger than Watergate.
US economic and political policy run by a committee of the Trilateral Commission—the Commission had been created in 1973 as an “informal discussion group” by David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who would become Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor.
Shortly after Carter won the presidential election, his aide, Hamilton Jordan, said that if after the inauguration, Cy Vance and Brzezinski came on board as secretary of state and national security adviser, “We’ve lost. And I’ll quit.” Lost—because both men were powerful members of the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key positions would signal a surrender of White House control to the Commission.
Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of state and national security adviser, as Jordan feared. But he didn’t quit. He became Carter’s chief of staff.
Now consider the vast propaganda efforts of the past 40 years, on so many levels, to install the idea that all nations and peoples of the world are a single Collective.
From a very high level of political and economic power, this propaganda op has had the objective of grooming the population for a planet that is one coagulated mass, run and managed by one force. A central engine of that force is the Trilateral Commission.
And, as one strategy for pushing the planet into that networked coagulated mass—and weakening it through the ubiquitous use of toxic medicines—we have seen a parade of phony global epidemics, promoted as threats requiring “a single universal response.”
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
Seems that only you and a couple of others are calling as much attention to the real agenda behind these “pandemics”, especially the current one surrounding Ebola.
Unfortunately,
Many of the other “alternative media” sites are jumping on the “fear-bandwagon”, and continuing to quote the self-described “experts” on all of the dangers and such. EVEN Natural News seems to be furthering the fear and paranoia (at least they are also identifying the natural methods of healing and protection from the infectious Ebola and other “dis-eases”).
However,
The biggest threat, hands-down, is all the constant fear and paranoia. Stress is the biggest enemy of a healthy Mind and Body. All of this fanfare (“fanning the flames of fear”, that is) accomplishes on main thing: Continuing the destructive effects of prolonged stress upon the people. THIS we need to defeat, first and foremost. Now is our time to put fear behind us and deal with the perpetrators (AND perpetuators) of the “fear-machine”.
Thank you, once again, for a well-thought-out article!
– Rev. Dragon’s Eye
Natural News and Alex Jones…the Larry Flynts of fear porn.
They used to be far better than that, a few years ago!
Guess there is big money in fear-politics EVEN IN THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA?
Terrible shame.
Unfortunately true, once the health ranger started to be friends with and listen to Alex Jones,
I knew that the health ranger was going to buy into the Alex Jones baloney.The health ranger site Natural News is still a good site for information and of course all the archive health information is excellent. I just ignore the fear porn articles and do not click on them. I never ever go to the Alex Jones site, I saw a video of him ranting on you tube one day and realized he was an actor and nothing more, I have no trust in him whatsoever. I do highly recommend Dr Sircus,
his sites and articles, are excellent
A very well paid actor! But yes, an actor.
Kudos, Jon: this is a very well-thought-out, well-documented article.
When statements and events are chronicled from their sources and then presented in such a manner, the old ‘conspiracy theorist’ derogatory banter / knee-jerk response has no teeth: what is presented has already departed from the realm of “theory” and been put into practice.
Even if your cape is at the dry cleaner’s, thanks, crusader!
Jon,
I’m confused. Can you clarify?
Is the quoted paragraph at the opening of this article a real genuine quote obtained from “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”?
Or is this something you are using as an “example”, but created by you?
If Jon, cannot answer this, can anyone else here assist?
I ask this because it just seems so incredible the “controllers” would tip their hand so blatantly and arrogantly.
Is this how stupid they think we are, that they can just throw their evil right into our faces as if to dare us to do something about it?
Jon,
Your articles remind me of this info. from ‘ole “Bertie” [Sir Bertrand Russell]. I wouldn’t be surprised if you have already quoted the info. I have posted here; but it won’t hurt to repeat it for the hard-of-thinking:
The following quotes are from the book “The Impact of Science on Society” (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1951 and 1953):
“I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. There would be nothing in this to offend the consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions of nationalists. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s.” (p. 26)
“…the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology…. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen. As yet there is only one country which has succeeded in creating this politician’s paradise.” (p. 30)
So tired of voting for idiots, where can we find some people with consciousness within that actually cares about people over money.
The Flexner Report ― 100 Years Later
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3178858/
Let’s use our imagination and try to figure out how we could abolish the system of our present governments and replaced them by something much more worthy.
I’m dreaming that we could get a team of ordinary citizens who would each have a particular skill and specialty in all field of life: judicial, medicine, law, engineering, architecture, urbanism, finances, markets, history, technology and so on.
These voluntary people would be willing to give two years of their time for an average salary and be assured that they would get their ordinary job back when the 2 years is over. After the 2 years, they are out and can never come back and another team comes in for another 2 years.
These specialized people would have to come from every State in equal quantity and would have to be voted only by the people of that State.
I believe that a system like that would end the corruption and the greed.