“If it isn’t Ebola, then what is it?”

“If it isn’t Ebola virus, and it isn’t weaponized Ebola virus, and it isn’t mutated Ebola virus, then what is it?”

by Jon Rappoport

October 11, 2014

(To join my email list, click here.)

Some readers, who haven’t been reading all my Ebola articles (archived here), will respond by saying, “If it isn’t Ebola, then what is it?”

The flaw in that question is the use of the word “it,” which suggests that whatever is making people sick and killing them is one thing.

This is the same flaw present in AIDS, West Nile, SARS, bird flu, Swine Flu. The assumption that one germ is responsible, in each “epidemic,” is false.

The illness and death occurred for many different reasons—and the medical trick involved is pretending a single virus connected all these disparate people together. (See also “How they would stage a bioterror event”).

In other words: hoax.


Newsflash: This simple method for saving lives is known by medical and public health authorities.

It’s known by governments. It’s known by mega-corporations. It’s known by the World Health Organization and the CDC. It’s known by a number of mainstream reporters. It’s known by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

But they aren’t bringing the solution. They’re expanding the problem.

They want population reduction and population debilitation.

They’re forwarding a program to conquer the land and the people, and extract (steal) the maximum profit from the natural resources of so-called Third World countries.

They need a cover story to explain why nothing can be done to radically improve the lives of the people.

The cover story is: the germ.

The tiny invisible terrorist.


power outside the matrix


People gravitate to single causes, single explanations, single symbols in every area of life, and they don’t penetrate further.

This is an aspect of the Matrix.

False unities are the meat and potatoes of very high-level propaganda. They are launched in politics, economics, medicine, organized religion, science, psychology, the military, mind control, in all the academic disciplines.

As an analogy, consider a painting in which the three-dimensional perspective has been radically shortened to eliminate the background. But the background is really where all the action is. The foreground is the false Oneness.

Grasping all of this allowed me to go further than I thought possible in my work as an investigative reporter. My method of investigation altered radically, and I hit paydirt.

The Matrix is a multi-layered, multi-dimensional operation, seeded with delusions that collaborate with the subconscious tendency to buy those delusions.

Your freedom and full power emerge when the subconscious is made conscious.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails here.

This entry was posted in Ebola.

12 comments on ““If it isn’t Ebola, then what is it?”

  1. voza0db says:

    HELLO 😉

    Amazing… “If it isn’t Ebola, then what is it?”! Really?!? “what is it”?!?! Still in this stage of blindness?

    It’s is a cocktail, being prepared for a long time:

    Abuse of antibiotics;
    Abuse of pesticides;
    Abuse of chemicals;
    Abuse of drugs;
    BAD/SCARCE nutrition;
    NO POTABLE WATER;
    NO RESIDUAL WATER SYSTEMS (collect and treatment);

    And yes it can happen that people living in such conditions can be infected by many germs! But the germs are only taking advantage of weak immune systems!

    Has with NON-HIV/AIDS, this immune-depression only occurs on people that doesn’t take good care of the body, and as so, germs take advantage!

    For the persons of europe and united states – allegedly – infected by Ebola virus, we don’t have any reliable source for confirmation, other visual, other material (lab test – PCR not suitable for this)!

    Come on… Wakey, Wakey

    🙄

    BE 😎

  2. roberta4949 says:

    if it aint ebola, what is it? I agree virus are everywhere, someone gets sick with a strange symptoms they test them and find an unusual virus they never seen before in this context and then say it is the cause, this condition ebola where they bleed out could be a end stage malnutrition and the virus just happens to be at the scene of the crime, remember the fisasco of cholesterol causes heart disease? now they know it is at the scene of the crime trying to save you not kill you. it could be candida infection or losing the ability to clot due to some type of poison ingested or food being eaten that thins the blood to much (my mother in law has a problem with blood thinning since she is on blood thinners and must watch what she eats like kale, and collard anything with a lot of vitamin k) they use vitamin k as a rat poison as well. it kills by causing the rodents to bleed to death. I wonder if they have to much tannic acid in the water supply or too much heavy metals in the water as this will cause break down in your body tissues like this, don’t know the details of it, but gives me the impression it would.

    • helot says:

      It’s Warafin they use as a rat poison, Not vitamin K. […]

      The rat poison is what your mother-in-law takes to thin her blood, and it’s Very bad stuff, very.

  3. From Québec says:

    Ebol Hoax: 100% REVEALED! CNN+NYT caught using CRISIS ACTORS! MUST SEE
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZonCVRQ-2s

    • Christine b says:

      Yes Quebec! I have been watching the NYT videos and I agree, they are staged. No investigation when the towns folk plead that the dead did not die of Ebola. They are called “uneducated”.

  4. Nicole says:

    Interesting factoid: I just read someplace else that antibodies aren’t even needed in order to recover from an illness, and this was already known back when they began making the measles vaccines in the mid-1900s. (Mentioned in this article: “Crucifying the Vaccine Heretics. ~by Roman Bystrianyk (co-author Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History).” His point is that the immune system is much more complex than it’s made out to be, and that it’s still able to do its job (at least partly?) without antibodies.

  5. Steve Stars says:

    Jon. Please correct me if I am wrong here:

    When they say “Ebola is spreading” How in hell do they know? WHAT TEST? WHAT TEST? WHAT TEST? WHAT TEST? WHAT TEST? WHAT TEST?
    W H A T – T E S T ?????

    I am absolutley astounded as to the lack of ANY verification we are getting about HOW these “Ebola patients” are being tested? If you think a PCR test is specific your are wrong. You can’t get an Ebola test at Walmart. (at least not yet)

    I keep searching articles for conformation of Ebola infection and the means used, and for some reason EVERYONE seems to have shut off the VITAL information to CONFIRM Ebola infection.

    Do you believe this just because some white-coated lab rat says so? I don’t trust the CDC, (after 30 years of lies about HIV testing) and neither should you, when they say the have confirmed Ebola. That is not saying Ebola infection is not true. It is just that we NEVER hear any source state which specific test for Ebola is used to “confirm” this.

    All of the INCREDIBLE hoopla and NO TEST mentioned or confirmed!

    Here is what CDC lists as Testing: (my comments) ELISA and PCR are very prone to error. Culture may be most accurate if “ebola” grows as would be predicted. Right now, the sloppy verification of “Ebola ” testing is both dangerous to conduct and incredibly prone to error.

    According to the CDC:

    Within a few days after symptoms begin
    Antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing

    IgM ELISA
    Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
    Virus isolation

    Later in disease course or after recoveryIgM and IgG antibodies

    Retrospectively in deceased patients Immunohistochemistry testing

    PCR
    Virus isolation

  6. 1918 Spanish Influenza was a vaccine-induced disease http://www.holistic-helper.com/articles/articlevaccinecaused1918flu.htm

    Only we the people united can prevent a repeat of 1918 in 2014 with vaccine-induced ebola.

    • davidcrowe says:

      You’re still assuming a single cause, single disease. First of all the 1918 flu wasn’t such a big problem at the time, it became a huge epidemic, only in retrospect. And there were many possible causes, not just one. For example, a massive fire of horse manure at a military base at the start. US Soldiers being shipped across the Atlantic with inadequate food and clothing for the cold and dampness. Malnutrition in the middle of a war. 1001 “remedies”, containing toxic metals or other chemicals. It’s simplistic to say there was a single cause (which is what Jon is pointing out).

  7. davep says:

    NO PATHOGENIC VIRUS HAS EVER BEEN –
    Isolated
    or
    Characterised
    or
    Identified

    Virus means poison (chemicals)

    All methods that assume to make identification are INDIRECT methods!
    Utterly Intangible!

    A simple analogy clarifies this simple matter that eludes the educated.

    I have a bag full of nuts and bolts from a scrapyard.
    From this evidence I claim as an expert/authority that all vehicles in the scrapyard are Ford Mondeos.
    The ubiquitous nuts and bolts are no different to ubiquitous protiens which our bodies recycle and discard continually in the trillions.

    PCR replicates proteins, but since a complete so called pathogenc virus has never been isolated, how is it possible to identify the even smaller constituent parts?
    The simple answer is that it is NOT!

    The very same appleis to genetics – NOT POSSIBLE and another complete hoax.

    It is the age of the chemical masquerade ! – used to geopolitical ends!

    • theodorewesson says:

      Just to add,…

      “The use of a germ as a cover story for a chemical.

      “In other words, there is no germ attack. It’s called a germ attack, but that’s a lie. The perps bring in researchers, to the affected area, who go on to claim they have isolated a germ that is the cause of death and illness. It’s a sham. What really happened was the spread of a toxic chemical that can’t be detected, unless you’re looking for it.”

      —Jon Rappoport

      http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/05/18/how-they-would-stage-a-bioterror-event/

Comments are closed.