Dept. of Defense Ebola manual: smoking guns

Dept. of Defense Ebola manual: smoking guns

by Jon Rappoport

October 9, 2014

NoMoreFakeNews.com

As I’ve been pointing out, the standard test for diagnosing Ebola is the PCR, which has many flaws that render it misleading and useless.

Therefore, “diagnosed with Ebola,” through the PCR test, means nothing. “Ebola” could be flu, could be “drinking contaminated water,” could be any number of non-Ebola conditions.

Analogy: you’re flying a plane at night over a land mass your instruments tell you is Greenland—but the instruments often indicate Greenland when they should be reporting Iceland, Alaska, Nova Scotia, Quebec or even Fiji.

So when the authorities report there are 6000 cases of Ebola and 3000 deaths, or when they report that two patients in the US have Ebola, they’re relying on a diagnostic test that can’t confirm any of these assertions is true.

This is verified in spades by a Dept. of Defense manual.

The title is: “Ebola Zaire (EZ1) rRT-PCR (TaqMan®) Assay on ABI 7500 Fast Dx, LightCycler, & JBAIDS: INSTRUCTION BOOKLET” published by “Joint Project Manager Medical Countermeasures Systems.” It is dated 14 August 2014.

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/Safety/EmergencySituations/UCM408334.pdf

Under the title is the statement: “Manufactured by the Naval Medical Research Center for the US DOD.”

Here is a quote:

“…the EZ1 assay [the PCR test] should not be performed unless the individual has been exposed to or is at risk for exposure to Ebola Zaire virus or has signs and symptoms of infection with Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) that meet clinical and epidemiologic criteria for testing suspect specimens.”

Translation: “Unless you’re already pretty sure the patient has Ebola—whatever that means—don’t run the test, because the test isn’t all that reliable.”

Not very reassuring. A test is a test. It’s supposed to register a true positive or negative result on anyone.

Here’s another quote:

“[The PCR test] should not be used as the sole basis for patient management decisions. Results [of the PCR] are for the presumptive identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014).”

Translation: “The word ‘presumptive’ means ‘we’re not sure’. And that’s right. We’re not sure. Don’t rely on the PCR for a definitive diagnosis of Ebola.”

Here is the final quote: “The definitive identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) requires additional testing and confirmation procedures in consultation with public health or other authorities for whom reporting is required. The diagnosis of Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) infection must be made based on history, signs, symptoms, exposure likelihood, and other laboratory evidence in addition to the identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) by this [PCR] test.”

That’s the capper. It baldly states that other diagnostic tests must be run. I can tell you what those other tests should be. One, purification and direct isolation of the virus from the patient; and two, a test to determine the amount of virus in the patient—because millions and millions of active Ebola virus must be present in the patient to even begin to say he is “an Ebola case.”

And I can tell you these tests are not being run on so-called Ebola patients.

Therefore, this whole “Ebola event” is the blind leading the blind.

We see other evidence of this. Press reports are mentioning the fact that far fewer “Ebola patients” than expected are showing blood hemorrhaging. Another tip-off that the PCR test is bringing into the fold “presumptive cases of Ebola”—people who are suffering from factors that have nothing to do with Ebola.


power outside the matrix


Last week, when Tom Frieden, the head of the CDC, gave a press conference concerning “the Dallas Ebola patient,” he assured one and all that the patient had Ebola, because the PCR test, “a very accurate test,” had been run. (see the 2m06s mark in the video of the press conference.)

Another CDC lie.

Some readers, who haven’t been reading all my Ebola articles (archived here), will respond by saying, “If it isn’t Ebola, then what is it?”

The flaw in that question is the use of the word “it,” which suggests that whatever is making people sick and killing them is one thing.

This is the same flaw present in AIDS, West Nile, SARS, bird flu, Swine Flu. The assumption that one germ is responsible, in each “epidemic,” is false.

The illness and death occurred for many different reasons—and the medical trick involved is pretending a single virus connected all these disparate people together.

In other words: hoax.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

This entry was posted in Ebola.

20 comments on “Dept. of Defense Ebola manual: smoking guns

  1. Atossa says:

    .

    Operation Bio-Shield Bush signed into law in 2004.

    ” The Project Bioshield Act was an act passed by the United States Congress in 2004 calling for $5 billion for purchasing vaccines that would be used in the event of a bioterrorist attack. This was a ten-year program to acquire medical countermeasures to biological, chemical, radiological, and nuclear agents for civilian use. A key element of the Act was to allow stockpiling and distribution of vaccines which had not been tested for safety or efficacy in humans, due to ethical concerns. ”

    Read that last paragraph again

    ” A key element of the Act was to allow stockpiling and distribution of vaccines which had not been tested for safety or efficacy in humans, due to ethical concerns. ”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Bioshield_Act

    http://nihrecord.nih.gov/newsletters/02_18_2003/story01.htm

    .

    • HealthyContrarian says:

      Good info here. Project BioShield is an integral part of what is now taking place. If one were to combine it with H.R. 307, The Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2013, the scenario unfolding becomes more crystallized.

      https://web.archive.org/web/20130213162423/http://www.gop.gov/bill/113/1/hr307

      “Sec. 302. … To improve our nation’s response to emergencies, this section would also authorize the FDA to do the following: (1) extend the expiration date for MCMs intended to be used for emergency responses; (2) grant waivers of current Good Manufacturing Practices; (3) authorize emergency dispensing of MCMs during an actual emergency without an individual prescription if permitted under State law or permitted by an order of the HHS Secretary; (4) work with other HHS agencies to create and issue emergency use instructions concerning a product’s conditions of use; and (5) authorize FDA to waive a product’s Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy if necessary.”

      “Sec. 305. Regulatory Management Plans – This section would require FDA to establish a process for frequent scientific feedback and interaction with those sponsors who’s MCMs have been procured through the Special Reserve Fund (SRF) in order to facilitate the approval, clearance and licensure of the MCMs. Under the section, FDA also would have the authority to apply this process to MCMs that are not security countermeasures.”

      http://truthsector.net/2014/09/26/ebolagate-2014-project-bioshield-and-the-fraudulent-ebola-outbreak/

      Keep up the good work, Jon.

  2. Jerry says:

    Obama is 99.9 % wrong about most things, therefore by him not thinking it is serious I automatically think he is wrong. I’ve read Michael Fumento on Sars H1 N1 and he has been spot on and also thinks there is very little to worry about. I know CDC can it be trusted or WHO. I hate being on the fence but I’m not convinced one way or the other. Also the left wing is 99.9% wrong on most things and they are worried.

  3. Please keep the Ebola posts coming. I have to keep reading and re-reading what you say because you are the ONLY source that I know of that is talking sense about the topic. Since it is a scary topic, constant reassurance is needed.

  4. The CDC has no more credibility. The vaccine industry is losing customers daily. Inciting fear in the ignorant masses is their only marketable product. Sharing your articles to put them out of business. Keep up the good work!

  5. Mark says:

    Ebola is most likely another instance of a 9/11-type tactic and will be used as one more excuse to further herd and corral the public.

    “Fearful people are more dependent, more easily manipulated and controlled, more susceptible to deceptively simple, strong, tough measures and hard-line postures… They may accept and even welcome repression if it promises to relieve their insecurities.” – George Gerbner, head of the Annenberg School for Communication for 25 years

    It’s important to remember this aspect too though:

    “Depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World.” – Henry Kissinger, National Security Advisor

  6. medusajoe says:

    So this proves PCR is only being brought to give money to big pharma as it is not able to detect Ebola , in the article it talks of other tests, but in fact it means isolating the virus not a test, to prove the virus is present. We have the same scam as HIV going on, but the big revelation is they only put that PCR test to give big money to big pharma, and to create a lie they gave the found a virus , when they admit here they cannot and we know they cannot according to the tests inventor , or the PCR methods inventor, but there reasons for using it are now clear, it’s [a] Prop and it costs money but it is perfectly useless to them and they admit it right there in what they wrote, but the reason they use it is to propagandise the public into thinking they have a test for Ebola.

  7. Deborah says:

    Jon, you wrote: “I can tell you what those other tests should be. One, purification and direct isolation of the virus from the patient; and two, a test to determine the amount of virus in the patient—because millions and millions of active Ebola virus must be present in the patient to even begin to say he is ‘an Ebola case.’”

    The thing is the ebola virus (from a sick person) has NEVER been isolated, purified, photographed and characterized, ever. So they wouldn’t know the ebola virus from their elbow. That worm like single particle photo we keep seeing could be anything, no one has claimed it is an isolated particle, let alone one from a human being. In fact, no pathogenic virus has ever been isolated and there is no proof of their existence. See the work of Dr Stefan Lanka for more information on this huge fraud. http://neue-medizin.com/lanka2.htm

  8. medusajoe says:

    The PCR Ebola test turns out to be just a prop as officials admit their great PCR test cannot detect Ebola.

    So in the small print the CDC via the dept of defence admit their great Ebola PCR test is not for detecting Ebola.
    So it becomes obvious the only reason the government pays big pharma to have the PCR test IS as a prop to fool you all, cos it a neat little real looking mobile test , and it looks good.

    They are paying big pharma all that money to produce that PCR test for didly squat reason other than to fool you and then possibly cause you to get a poisonous rabies based virus vaccine and kill you , all because they say your positive for protein in your blood cos PCR looks for proteins , so we say thats Ebola and so your safe to give a death sentence to by our antidote which is designed to kill you.

    Because at no stage will the PCR test be of any use to them as it can neither find virus or count numbers of virus .

    The Cdc even lie to you by making it sound like they must use other tests to diagnose,
    but what they actually mean is they need to isolate and purify live Ebola from your body until they can prove you have enough Ebola present to call you a Ebola case that got enough Ebola virus to make you sick.

    They are such liars, tut tut tut, using that test as a prop! How evil of them to lie to you like that.

    PCR ‘s inventor already knew it could not detect virus or numbers of virus, he’s on record of stating that exact thing.

  9. ask? says:

    Thanks Jon, can’t ever say that enough for the wonderful information.

  10. Sam Price says:

    NaturalNews.com has an article today called, “The real Ebola risk to the USA is from uncontrolled outbreaks in Central and South America, not direct flights from Africa,”

    http://www.naturalnews.com/047206_Ebola_outbreak_Central_America_southern_border.html

    Unfortunately the Health Ranger seems to have “drunk the Kool-Aid” on this Ebola issue — he seems to completely believe the official stories.

    I posted the following comment after that article — and the screen said “Comment accepted pending moderation,” and the comment then didn’t show up. So I tried two more times (total of three times) — with the same result.

    (I.e., the comment got deleted three times — very disappointed in the Health Ranger!)

    Here’s what I posted:

    =====================================

    The whole “Ebola crisis” is 100% a propaganda creation — not a real global outbreak of a killer germ. The propaganda operation is designed to trick the global populations (including Americans) into believing that martial law, “isolation” (imprisonment) in “treatment centers” (pseudo-medical concentration camps), and forced injection with toxic fake “treatments” and deadly “vaccines” are necessary.

    As a healthful (sane) alternative to Natural News’s disastrously unhealthful (insane) coverage of this fake “Ebola” outbreak — read Jon Rappoport’s Ebola articles at http://www.nomorefakenews.com

    Unfortunately Natural News is helping the powers-that-be with their Ebola scare-project — by the Health Ranger accepting the official scare propaganda at face value — and then, insinuating that the Health Ranger knows that the real facts are even worse than the authorities are admitting!

    Health Ranger is accepting the false propaganda — and then adding to the falseness OF the propaganda (by adding the momentum of his own name, reputation, website, readership, etc.).

    Either Mike Adams is confused himself (he believes the false official stories are real) — or — he knows they’re false and he’s deliberately “catapulting the propaganda” (that’s George W. Bush’s famous terminology).

    Either way, Natural News is unfortunately forwarding to its readers an entirely false story about the so-called “Ebola outbreak.”

    For sane and truthful Ebola articles, check out http://www.nomorefakenews.com

    • Atossa says:

      .

      Today on the financial news network, CNBC, they said what General Kelly said… about a possible Ebola breakout south of the border causing mass illegal immigration into the USA… may have contributed to the stock market crash this week.

      Here is the General Kelly quote CNBC aired today.

      ” If it breaks out, it’s literally, ‘Katie bar the door,’ and there will be mass migration into the United States,” Kelly said. “They will run away from Ebola, or if they suspect they are infected, they will try to get to the United States for treatment.”

      [More at this link]

      [http://time.com/3486009/marine-general-john-kelly-ebola-migration/]

  11. Steve Stars says:

    The late Dr. Stan Monteith wrote a book called “AIDS: The Unnecessary Epidemic” back in 1991, which identified many of the same problems we see now with the problematic and lax CDC response to Ebola. I debated Dr. Stan on the topic of HIV as “the cause of AIDS,” and pointed out to him that he was RIGHT about the way this “epidemic” was being mishandled, but WRONG as to WHY.

    The CDC knew AIDS was not an infectious epidemic caused by the mythical “HIV”. If people would have been quarantined and stringent measures enacted, the entire scam would have been exposed as a fraud, as the detainees would have eventually demanded after investigation. Instead HHS and the CDC got people to volunteer for testing and then taking toxic drugs that fatally poisoned millions of people world wide, while they stole 400 billion dollars from the public.

    Deja Vu? Obviously we see the same trend here. Ask yourself this. If this entire PR campaign of Ebola fear was real, should we expect that a intense lockdown on air traffic and exposure risks would be in effect?

    What does the government really know about this and why are they not “frantic” over Ebola spreading? What test is available (PCR is absurd) to the general public to PROVE that Ebola is the cause of these diseases? How would we know?

    We have seen FEAR used to control people over and over. HIV. 911, Anthrax,OKC, Global Warming, SARS, H1N1, HPV, Aurora, Sandy Hook, WMDs Chemical gas, ISIS.

    If we are supposed to be afraid, why isn’t the CDC? And why is our US Health Department dropping the ball? This looks like another dangerous scam.

    I forgot to mention here that when we first interviewed Peter Duesberg in 92, he had just testified in a criminal court case about HIV being a fraud in defense of a guy who was being charged with assault with a deadly weapon:”HIV”. It was on the front page of the Berkeley paper when we arrived there.

    Peter said he was convicted but would be out in about 6 months. (unknown to the general public) That is just ONE CASE. And it really shook things up. Imagine what would have happened if 300,000 or more people would have been quarantined? We were involved in several cases like this including the case down in Perth.

    • theodorewesson says:

      Hi Steve, thanks for posting.

      If/when you get the chance, please post some links to your research/interviews.

      ~~~~

      “Some readers, who haven’t been reading all my Ebola articles (archived here: http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/category/ebola/), will respond by saying, ‘If it isn’t Ebola, then what is it?’

      “The flaw in that question is the use of the word ‘it,’ which suggests that whatever is making people sick and killing them is one thing.

      “This is the same flaw present in AIDS, West Nile, SARS, bird flu, Swine Flu. The assumption that one germ is responsible, in each ‘epidemic,’ is false.

      “The illness and death occurred for many different reasons—and the medical trick involved is pretending a single virus connected all these disparate people together.

      “In other words: hoax.”

      —Jon Rappoport

      In…

      Dept. of Defense Ebola manual: smoking guns
      http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/10/09/dept-of-defense-ebola-manual-smoking-guns/

      • Steve Stars says:

        Thank you Jon for staying on top of this. We have seen this before. Pattern recognition of germ fear tactics used by the Medical Industrial complex for a variety of reasons,

  12. Frank Lee says:

    Some great posts on this and previous pages. A tip ‘o the pen to the vast detail from Statism is a Religion.

    All well and good, but no essential question of why human beings are so incompetent as to allow “authority” and stratification to even exist. ??? Social hierarchy is a failed organizational method. Ok? You need to try a different organizational modus. 10,000 years of allowing social hierarchy to destroy any hope of social culture seems rather redundant. Don’t you think? Or don’t you?

    Step 1.) Humanity needs to employ an intellectual paradigm that recognizes abject failure when abject failure is obviously present. Try a whole new concept: Like a paradigm that REJECTS authority. ALL authority. Perhaps a paradigm that eliminates not only status, but repeated failure as well. Hello?

    2.) No one speaks of lateralized social organizations. I guess the term contains too many syllables. As social degenerates, I guess our herd/stock has been numbed into thinking rank and status are the hallmarks of good governance – even when most participants in the experiment are completely enslaved and impoverished. I would ask if humans have gone insane, but the answer has already established itself.

    3.) No one is actively introducing an Planet-wide communal endeavor. (Other than NWO enthusiasts) Saving the planet from our industrial insanities would be a good start… I guess cooperative endeavors are “always” trumped by thugs in boots with riot truncheons. Communism is BAD. They teach this in our heavily funded fake “schools”.

    Rather than discussing efficient resource distribution and a permanent stabilization of our environment, let’s embrace wholesale famine and planetary collapse. Let’s continue our paradigm of endless war, pestilence, desecration of the intellect and spirit. It’s all worked well so far… Not to worry:

    Nature will find a way to rebalance reality. Only man won’t be there to enjoy the results. Our wonderfully faked Ebola virus and social stratification disease, is irrelevant. Happy extinction everyone! Nice try!

  13. Jan says:

    Ebola is a PARASITE. I stocked up on wormood, black walnut, ginger and garlic. All these kill parasites. Combine that with vitamin C and organic diet and no problem. I also grow my own oregano.

  14. Misha says:

    So what do you suggest if they force quarantine for political reasons?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *