by Jon Rappoport
August 21, 2014
(To join our email list, click here.)
I have been writing about the CDC research scientist who may be about to step out of the shadows and reveal himself—
He was, a decade ago, part of the CDC team who suppressed data showing a clear connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.
If he comes clean now, he will expose deep crimes of the CDC. He will torpedo the ship.
To succeed, he has to be strong. He has had ten years to consider how to go public.
Express his own shame, remorse, and regret? Yes.
But he mustn’t let his remorse make him so weak he can’t tell the truth in the forthright way the truth deserves.
And he has to say everything he knows. The specifics. Names, dates, places, publications, lies. He has to describe exactly who ordered the suppression of the facts, who said the vaccine was safe when it was a loaded weapon.
The untold number of parents and their autistic children who were assaulted and damaged by vaccines deserve all that.
If the CDC had told the truth about vaccine-damage all along, many lives would have been saved, not destroyed.
Repeat: If the CDC had told the truth about vaccine-damage all along, many lives would have been saved, not destroyed.
I don’t know how well acquainted this whistleblower is with basic facts about vaccine damage, beyond his specialized area. He ought to learn a few things, in order to understand the true scope of the disaster and the tragedy and the crime.
Perhaps it will help him bolster his courage, knowing the importance of his new mission.
Let’s start here. “Statistics Report, March 5, 2014” (source: hrsa.gov: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program). This is a compilation of US government compensation payouts to people who have been damaged by vaccines. It’s published by the US Department of Health and Human Services / Health Resources and Services Administration.
Chart III: From 1988 to 2014, the US government has paid out $2,857,926,807.60 in compensation. $2.8 billion.
Keep in mind that many people who have been damaged by vaccines have never contacted the federal compensation program at all. Others have engaged in the long, arduous, and frustrating process, only to give up in midstream.
So the true figure on what the federal government would and should have paid out by now is much higher than $2.8 billion.
Every dollar represents physical and mental vaccine destruction.
How many people in America are severely injured and damaged by vaccines every year?
If we listen to the sold-out experts, we come away thinking: very few.
But the truth is, there is no reliable accounting. There is no reliable system for assessment.
The reference here is “In the Wake of Vaccines,” by Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the National Vaccine Information Center. Her article was published in the Sept./Oct. 2004 issue of Mothering Magazine.
Gathering information from several sources, Fisher makes a reasonable estimate of vaccine damage—actual figures are not available or carefully tracked or vetted. In other words, the system for reporting adverse effects is broken.
Fisher: “But how many children have [adverse] vaccine reactions every year? Is it really only one in 110,000 or one in a million who are left permanently disabled after vaccination?
“Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler observed in 1993 that less than 1 percent of doctors report adverse events following prescription drug use. [See DA Kessler, ‘Introducing MEDWatch,’ JAMA, June 2, 1993: 2765-2768]
“There have been estimates that perhaps less than 5 or 10 percent of doctors report hospitalizations, injuries, deaths, or other serious health problems following vaccination. The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act contained no legal sanctions for not reporting; doctors can refuse to report and suffer no consequences.
“Even so, each year about 12,000 reports are made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System; parents as well as doctors can make those reports. [See RT Chen, B. Hibbs, “Vaccine safety,” Pediatric Annals, July 1998: 445-458]
“However, if that number represents only 10 percent of what is actually occurring, then the actual number may be 120,000 vaccine-adverse events. If doctors report vaccine reactions as infrequently as Dr. Kessler said they report prescription-drug reactions, and the number 12,000 is only 1 percent of the actual total, then the real number may be 1.2 million vaccine-adverse events annually.”
1.2 million.
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
What government agency should be making a titanic effort to do the (honest) research on the true extent of vaccine damage?
The CDC.
That’s their central job. Counting numbers.
That’s who the secret vaccine whistleblower works for, right now.
If he steps out of shadows, he should understand the extent of his employer’s betrayal of the American people, when its spokespeople say, over and over again, that vaccines are uniformly safe and effective.
He should understand that, and it should give him strength.
Go public NOW. The whole truth, revealed immediately, is his best protection.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
Excellent Jon! Your articles seem to appear on many websites.
They had the science! At least, they care about our teeth. 😛
Andy Wakefield tweeted: Whistleblower’s identity revealed tomorrow.
I was recently re-reading Jon’s Matrix collection interviews of propagandist ‘Ellis Medavoy’. One thing that really hit me was when Medavoy characterized the medical cartel as being governed at the highest levels, by a group of Nazis. Most people would turn away from considering that. They’ve been taught to almost have blind faith in the medical establishment. – – – If a investigator were to accept this Nazi mentality as a premise (if only for awhile), he may discover things that were closed to his mind before. There may be more than just money at stake.
This may be a bit of an emotional reaction, as I, being German, am really fed up with the Nazi-call whenever there is a bunch of (potentially) vicious people (probably) organising some big cynical crime against humanity.
I don’t want to discuss the Third Reich here, its practices, not only because I’m not allowed to do this openly (in the sense that I could doubt the official line in any way) by “German” (we are an occupied country, as Mr Obama quite clearly said in Ramstein) law (up to five years of prison for one case; Mr Mahler got more than twelve years, as the sentences were “accumulated”); anyway, the real Nazis were very much into “Volksgesundheit”, which means that they most probably wouldn’t have tried to cripple their own population through vaccines, creating a lot of disabled and some big cost for the Reich and its overall economy.
If there are Nazis there (I know that there are global-warming-liar-Nazis and global-warming-denier-Nazis already), please do name what is really “Nazi” about them. Are they Germans or of German descent? Is their ideology linked to Nazi-ideology, as opposed to plutocratic ideology, for example? How did You discern this? Could You explain?
For if those people are true Nazis, I definitely want to know. If they’re only half-true Nazis, what is the one, what the other half?
The “N”-word is used (maybe a little less in the US than over here, but still a lot) all the time, even when it’s about some local habitat of some frog or fly (the Nazis introduced animal protection, Hitler was a vegetarian…) often just to kill a discussion. See “Godwin’s Law”.
Interesting that you didn’t ask about ‘Medavoy’ who Jon interviewed. The Nazi characterization was by him- a retired propagandist who had been in the American OSS during WW2 – predecessor to the CIA. (Medavoy said ‘Nazi’; he didn’t say ‘German’ – that’s what you added. Or what you put out as a straw man.) Much of the eugenics agenda came from the United States far before Hitler came to power in Germany.
You’ll have to do your own research, including what happen to certain high level Nazis after the end of WW2. You’ll have to do your own research on I.G. Farben. And, you’ll have to read the interviews by Jon for yourself.
It is quite interesting that you hear the word ‘Nazi’ and convert that to a slur against ‘Germans’. Many associate ‘Nazi’ with fascists with a particular racist/eugenics philosophy.
JON – I may be mistaken about Medavoy being in the OSS during WW2, and may have mixed him up with someone else. If I’m in error please delete that part of my post above. Thanks
“It is quite interesting that you hear the word ‘Nazi’ and convert that to a slur against ‘Germans’. Many associate ‘Nazi’ with fascists with a particular racist/eugenics philosophy.”
I did not convert the word ‘Nazi’ into a slur against ‘Germans’. Even if it be often exactly that. As for research: The (German) Nazis were no fascists. They had fascist allies, yes, but they were profoundly socialist as well, planned to take the old Prussian aristocracy out even further, fomented a meritocracy regardless of social background, so that the working class “kid” of 28 could be the boss of some Von Brandenburg-Strelitz of 45. They (mostly) found people like Mussolini or Franco to be completely unmodern. Outdated. They were their (Franco not so much) allies against the “plutocracies” though. Thus they pronounced their fundamental antifascism not too loudly.
I go with Confucius who said that with unclear words, concepts, everything goes down the gutter. At least You clarified what You meant partly.
It may well be that there are fascists with a particular racist/eugenics philosophy at work there.
Ah, yeah, the straw man, I almost forgot. My name above is my real name in real life, You can easily check that out, as not even Google is dumb enough not to find me, my publications, address, phone number, You name it.
I understand, though, that You got suspicious, there is nothing to that.
Greetings
Magnus
Reblogged this on janamurray and commented:
He mustn’t let his remorse make him so weak he can’t tell the truth in the forthright way the truth deserves.
And he has to say everything he knows. The specifics. Names, dates, places, publications, lies. He has to describe exactly who ordered the suppression of the facts, who said the vaccine was safe when it was a loaded weapon.
The untold number of parents and their autistic children who were assaulted and damaged by vaccines deserve all that.
If the CDC had told the truth about vaccine-damage all along, many lives would have been saved, not destroyed.
[…] vaccines are not being given a good press. Indeed, prior to it hitting academic news feeds and before he could even mention his name, Jon Rappoport was reporting on the prospect of William W. Thompson, CDC Whistle-blower, coming […]