Booking a reservation for the movie called Reality
by Jon Rappoport
August 5, 2013
This is a serious process, for which some introspection is necessary.
You need to consider whether you are an individual or a group. That’s the first order of business. Group ticketing is easy and flows quickly through the system. That’s because any group is automatically ripe for mind control.
The individual, however, is a different matter. He may think he is a group, in which case: refer to the above paragraph. His application will be approved without delay. But if he knows he is an individual, certain restrictions apply.
His visible presence inside the movie called Reality alerts others to the potential existence of illusion. He could confuse members of the audience. They might begin to wonder whether they’ve been conned and hoodwinked. This is unacceptable.
There is an option. The individual, while inside the movie called Reality, could act as a representative for the producers. In this way, he utilizes his innate force, but channels it.
He acts for the greater good, which is the seamless impact of the film on the mind. After all, the whole objective is:
the inculcation of a wrap-around full-blown sensorium in which all possible audience actions are fed back into the movie.
To put it more simply, the film supports the film.
The producers and their special-effects designers have built what they call Sponge-and-Bounce. This means: whatever the audience perceives or thinks or does is absorbed and becomes an element of the production.
The founders of the Reality Manufacturing Company are producing, well, reality, aren’t they? They aren’t making a movie you can watch with a bag of popcorn in your lap. You’re in it. You’re a player, as long as you believe in your work as an actor. Above all, authenticity.
Can you give your heart and soul to the role? Can you support, in your actions, the movie?
Here is an interesting facet. Movies have directors, but the long-term goal here is a self-perpetuating space-and-time continuum. The audience carries forward the entire film. On their own. Eventually.
Their faith and belief in it, despite doubts, problems, trials and tribulations, is unwavering.
The power of that machinery is formidable, to say the least.
If you’re an artist, take careful note. If you book a reservation and enter the movie, you’re encouraged to do your subsequent work in such a way that it reflects the film. It mimics it. It mirrors Reality. In this way, the movie spawns little versions of itself. Think of what you’re doing as a homage, a tribute. You might even say you’re writing a glowing review of the movie while being in it.
If, on the other hand, you’re a “rebel-artist,” there is room for you, but your role is to attract scorn. You’re criticizing, in a way, the film, and at best you’ll be permitted to function as a safety valve, to let off steam.
You see, the audience, while completely immersed in the movie, is at the same time, chewing on its bridle. Audience members are burying a significant, even titanic, amount of, shall we say, outrage.
At a deep level, they know and experience a massive desire to rebel against living inside the film.
You, as the rebel-artist, allow small amounts of their energy to blow off.
Unless you take it too far. UNLESS YOU TAKE IT TOO FAR.
There is a phenomenon called “waking up inside the movie.”
If that is what happens to you, and if you then create compelling art that exemplifies the waking-up phenomenon—which is unavoidable—you begin to test the system.
The results, from all angles, are unpredictable, given enough time.
It might be better if you choose not to reserve a ticket for the movie called Reality.
If you’re wondering who I am and why I’m spilling so many beans, and who I work for:
I’m a former employee of the Reality Manufacturing Company. It’s simple. After long years of service, my boredom quotient reached a tipping point. I quit.
And now I have a new idea. It’s called Open Future. For individuals only.
It’s based on a bottom-line premise. Enough artists, with enough desire, with enough power, with enough independence from the central Glob, with millions of their very different Realities side by side…will explode the one central movie.
The audience cast out by that explosion will eventually find their way. Yes, there will be chaos, but it will be fertile.
Oh, a great deal of propaganda claims that this sort of liberation is impossible, I understand that. I know a few of the people who designed the propaganda.
But I assure you, it’s possible.
Why do people enter the movie in the first place? Boredom, desperation. They might be attempting to avoid arrest. They might think the movie is a lark. They don’t realize its enveloping qualities. Or they’ve given up on their own imaginations.
Then there’s a whole class of people who enter the movie because they see an opportunity to exercise power in it. They want to impose some sub-reality on other audience members.
There’s even a group who has a fetish and obsession about watching the audience members. All the time. They watch and track.
Some people enter the movie because they’ve read ads about the aesthetic qualities of film. Symmetry, harmony, balance, equilibrium, geometric simplicity in the production design. They have a hunger for these things. They want three dimensions of space, simplistic perspective, and one dimension of time. The Company calls all this “the lowest common denominator.”
And of course, many audience members, for their own reasons, enjoy compliance and obedience. They’re looking for a movie in which they can follow orders.
It takes all kinds of people to make a movie a commercial success.
Jon Rappoport
The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
Hi Jon,
It’s good to think isn’t it ! That’s freedom at its best. I like your way to explore an idea, a wave, in its most hidden corners. That’s like entering a wedge in a tree and hitting on it from all sides until the tree falls – the tree being our illusions driven by ages of swallowing nonsense.
Best !!
[…] Hey, if there’s a commercial break, you might want to read: http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/08/04/booking-a-reservation-for-the-movie-called-reality/ […]
Not bad shtuff here, mac. You sure ’bout all this? Just this simple, rebel a lot, TOO MUCH even, with “other rebels”? Sounds like “just another group” to me…
Nah. I do well enough ON MY OWN. That’s the whole point here, after all. But in fact this movie is not what it is pretended to be by overgenerous imaginations. It is a MALIGN CRIME against the Spiritual Dignity of Moral and Immortal Spirits. Or, it’s not. Take your pick. But it is either or, and the ramifications of picking either one will never be reconciled to those of picking the other, regardless of the truth of each.
The Gnostic Truth will always prevail, however. The illusion will be exploded, it must be. Nothing of value will be lost, but the only question is “Will I, as a Being, be of value”? If this question is asked at all, and how it is answered by such a Being, is what will decide the true answer to the question in fact.
In phenomenology it shall be noted that there is a distinct fragrance associated with truly going against the grain of the “movie” (the fantasy in the imagination of an evil mind): It is the fragrance of a strange, subvenient “matrix” of machined intent. It is very unfriendly.
You wrote,
“There is a phenomenon called ‘waking up inside the movie.’
“If that is what happens to you, and if you then create compelling art that exemplifies the waking-up phenomenon—which is unavoidable—you begin to test the system.”
Jon, you put it in spades here. It happened to me in 1968. I called it, unadornedly, “Awakening,” capitalizing to differentiate ‘twixt It and what is referred to as “awakening and opening eyelids to any typical day” in “The Movie of Reality” that you describe so refreshingly well. Biggie Awakening is a magical thing. Except for transient effects like wills of wisps that dance around as phantoms, it is 100% individual. And it is scary as hell.
It is said that if one invents a better mousetrap, the world will beat a path to one’s door. How true it is. The world did beat a path to my door to see, “The Awakened Man,” which they had thought was another possibly great invention because of the unique title. But except for just a handful, everybody that showed up at my door eventually concluded, “Hey, we came to see God, but this is only a man. He refused to do a single trick. Any God would be happy to do tricks and otherwise behave properly in our fantastic presence. After all, we are The Greatest Things God Ever Made. We want our money back and we want the imposter punished for misleading us.”
It was not easy to coax them to ask for their money back that they had tossed at my feet and which I had not even imagined gathering up even if I’d wanted, as it was funny money.
However, I did plenty of tricks. Only problem was, they were invisible except for that handful of folks wearing special lenses.
Since the instant I Awoke in August 1968 (hey, the present month is the 44th Anniversary of that Blessed Event and this day is very close to the same day), my “sleight-of-hand” has so improved with age and facility that only I am able to view the movie in which I am now billed, “The Greatest Trickster of All.” I believe this is called, “End-Game,” isn’t it? Ha, ha, ha.
Adam
http://TheClassicFilm.com …Act One Scene One …TAKE!!!
Never alone. Yu make a gynourmous difference to my wee matrix and I thank Yu. Rockon JR<3
Jon,
For the artist there is no such thing as “going too far.” The artist wants to go as far as is humanly possible.
Thank you,
Jerry
[…] […]