THE BATMAN OP EXPANDS: YOU SHOT THOSE PEOPLE

by Jon Rappoport

August 2, 2012

www.nomorefakenews.com

The Batman-murder psy-op is expanding.

It aims to blow up one horrible crime into a vicious general lie.

Now we’re told that a U of Colorado “threat assessment team” was aware of “problems with James Holmes” in June, a month before he committed murder and mayhem in the Aurora theater.

http://www.ydr.com/nation-world/ci_21213539/?source=hot_topics

The covert op is unfolding. “Threat assessment team” is a way of claiming that problems Holmes was having are not unique to him; in fact, this is a society-wide problem. Otherwise, why would a threat assessment team exist in the first place?

And what is the supposed problem? Mental illness. It’s a chronic epidemic.

The subliminal psyop asserts that derangement is in the nature of the human condition; more specifically, it’s in the nature of the brain.

“Threat assessment team” becomes a symbol that lets the public know the Batman murders are a symptom of a wider situation. According to the promoted story line, we the people need threat assessment teams, and not just at the U of Colorado.

The op called the Aurora Massacre isn’t just about taking people’s guns away. It’s about inventing a pressing need for controlling mental illness before it manifests as violence.

And once that fallacious concept is planted, the psyop pros can not only suggest we have to snitch on “suspicious behavior,” they can demand the government expand threat assessment throughout society in order to make predictions and grab people and “treat” them before they spin out of control and do something horrible.

Who assesses and predicts threat? Who develops algorithms that can identify potential murderers among us? Psychiatrists.

In 1988, in my book, AIDS INC., I warned that fascism would stand the best chance of spreading across the world through medical operations, because “medical science” flies no partisan political banners, seems to take no side, appears to be all about objective research and healing.

So YOU are reinvented as a potential Batman murderer. You could go off. You could snap. You could fall victim to a brain malfunction. You could give way to your darker impulses. No one is immune.

Therefore, I have to be protected from you, and you have to be protected from me.

That’s the lie and that’s the op.

What is the op hiding? The fact that the psychiatric drugs cause violence. It’s not mental illness. It’s the drugs used to treat invented and concocted and fabricated “mental disorders.”

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2012/02/11/the-school-shooting-white-paper/

http://www.nimh.nih.gov/statistics/SMI_AASR.shtml

http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/neuro/neuro99/web1/Murphy.html

http://www.breggin.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=43&Itemid=66

In other words, we’re looking at a self-fulfilling prophecy.

In the widest terms, the op involves randomly seeding society with the violence-causing psychiatric drugs, and then, when inexplicable murders and suicides occur, step in behind that and call it “mental illness” and implement far-reaching threat-assessment strategies to put the whole society in a straitjacket.

When I say “concoct and invent mental illnesses,” I mean that literally.

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2012/02/27/the-liars-liar/

These so-called disorders are put in place by committees of psychiatrists, who slice and dice and chop human suffering, pain, and confusion into fancy categories, for which there are no diagnostic tests.

So it may look like Dr. Lynne Fenton, James Holmes’ psychiatrist, and her threat assessment team missed the boat on Holmes and should come in for heavy criticism, but the truth is: the Aurora massacre will only serve to strengthen psychiatry’s position as the preeminent authority on violence prevention.

Here are two examples of how this bogus “prevention” will be achieved. Soon, we will see drugs planted with tiny transmitters that remotely let “health providers” know whether people are complying with their prescribed medication schedules.

http://blogs.nature.com/news/2012/07/digital-pills-make-their-way-to-market.html

What better way to pretend that patients with mental disorders are being kept in line, before they can commit egregious crimes?

The other example is far-reaching to the extreme. It is Obamacare itself. Under the new law, the US Dept. of Health and Human Services is tasked with compiling, yes, a comprehensive list of all diseases and disorders. Step two is listing the approved treatments for these conditions.

At some point, we will see both the diagnoses and the drugs for: prevention of those (fictional) mental disorders that “could lead to violence.” The assumption that you or I or anyone could be the next Batman killer will be built into the system. So will the drug “cure.”

On that day, the Brave New World will reveal more of its ugly countenance.

The basic and strongest argument against what is coming is the freedom to choose or refuse medication. Universally, people still recognize this principle. They understand it. They support it, intellectually and viscerally. This is a freedom anyone can grasp. It must be pursued without compromise.

Otherwise, it could be you who are said to be potentially dangerous.

It could be you who are sedated into being harmless and therefore a Safe Citizen.

They might even give you an ID package which designates your preferred status. And in your addled condition, you might wear the ID as a badge of honor.

What we are witnessing here is Clockwork Orange reconfigured. The jumping off point is James Holmes. But unlike the key figure in Stanley Kubrick’s film, Holmes doesn’t have to be the actual killer. He could merely be a designated patsy left holding the bag. He is, either way, the occasion for implementing medical strategies to condition people into androidal “inner peace.”

Which means passivity, and the acceptance of the Psychiatric Society.

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

COMPARING PHOTOS OF JAMES HOLMES

by Jon Rappoport

July 30, 2012

www.nomorefakenews.com

The latest trend in the Batman murder case is placing two photos of James Holmes side by side and comparing nose width, size of ears, and eye color.

One photo shows a wider nose and a rounder face. The eye color in each photo is different.

http://benandmatt.iheart.com/pages/bm-blog.html?feed=324902&article=10295464

I find this interesting…but take a look at the video Holmes made when he was eighteen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5oVUqFF_mU

Holmes’ facial structure, in the video, looks much more like the photo of Holmes taken after he was arrested, with orange/red hair.

So the odd man out is the round-faced Holmes photo.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/07/20/157100627/shooting-suspect-described-as-recluse

It was released to the press by the University of Colorado/Denver, where Holmes was pursuing his PhD.

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

AURORA PHASE 2: DR. LYNNE FENTON, BATMAN KILLER, THE DRUGS, THE DRUG MONEY

By Jon Rappoport

July 28, 2012

www.nomorefakenews.com

People don’t get it. The media don’t get it and they don’t want to get it. Billions of dollars are riding on the drugs Dr. Lynne Fenton may have prescribed to her patient, James Holmes, the accused Batman shooter.

And when billions of dollars in potentially lost revenue are hanging in the balance, the interested parties take action. They’re serious about their money. They don’t screw around.

You see, if James Holmes was, for example, taking Prozac, all of a sudden no one wants to take it. If doctors prescribe it to patients, the patients say, “Hey, wasn’t this the drug that nutcase took before he killed all those people in the theater?”

And that’s not all. Congress holds hearings, not because they want to, but because they want to look like they’re doing the right thing. And at those hearings, all sorts of nasty stuff comes out about Prozac. It’s big news. The studies that showed the drug was dangerous, that it could and would cause people to commit suicide and homicide. Boom. More bad press for the manufacturer. More investigations. More lost revenue.

So right now, in Aurora, there are pharmaceutical people on the scene. Not just low-level goofballs, but competent investigators. They want to know what drugs James Holmes was prescribed. They need to know. And behind the scenes, people with clout are making phone calls. These pharma types are talking to government agents and it’s crazy time and damage-control time, and nobody is laughing. This is a high-stakes game. WHAT DRUGS WAS HOLMES TAKING?

There is pressure on both attorneys in the case, too. And the cops. With an insanity plea lurking in the wings, Holmes’ medical records could very well see the light of day. That would let everybody know what the drugs were. So somebody is calling the governor of Colorado, and other state officials, and they’re trying to maneuver and manipulate the legal process, to make the medical records vanish.

Come on. This isn’t just a murder case. Now it’s about money. Big pharma lawyers are reading up on Colorado law to find loopholes, ways to get around revealing Holmes’ medical history.

Holmes is now a pawn. He’s the nowhere kid who is going to be shuttled around on the game board to save the drug money for the people who own it.

The money is dirty. It always was. It’s been made on the backs of people who have died at the rate of 100,000 a year in the US alone. That’s a million people per decade—pharmaceutically caused deaths. The heads of these drug companies and their allied banks are Mafiosa. They inflict more human damage in a day than all the goombahs who have ever shot up pizza joints on Mulberry Street or dealt narcotics to addicts across the world, since Sicily puts itself on the map as the center of the Cosa Nostra.

If they could get to Holmes in his cell, they’d erase him. They’d make it look like a suicide. Today. What do you think “lone shooter” is all about? Yes, the covert op that very well may have used Holmes as the patsy, to push the government into banning guns, is a major piece here. But that work is done. Now it’s “lone shooter” because getting rid of Holmes by killing him or warehousing him for the rest of his life in a mental prison, with brain-hammer drugs making him into a vegetable, means that the names of the psychiatric drugs he was taking before the massacre will be lost to history, and no one will take the criminal investigation any further.

Update: Holmes’ psychiatrist, Lynne Fenton, was reprimanded by the Colorado Board of Medical Examiners, in 2005, for prescribing drugs to several patients, including herself, without entering the information in patient records. She could now find a target painted on her back, as the drug companies try to make her a patsy, an “irresponsible and incompetent doctor who didn’t give Mr. Holmes what he truly needed.” They would do this to take the drugs off the hook. “In the hands of a good psychiatrist, the proper medications would have worked well.” Who knows? Maybe they’ll claim she didn’t even treat Holmes directly, but supervised interns or grad students, who actually worked with Holmes.

I wrote the following as part of a 1999 white paper for The Truth Seeker Foundation, in the wake of the Columbine massacre. So the information is from that period. The white paper was titled: WHY DID THEY DO IT? THE SCHOOL SHOOTINGS ACROSS AMERICA.

It’s quite long; I’ve only printed an excerpt here. You can click here to read the whole thing. It’s very relevant to the issues at hand.

Begin excerpt. (Note: Additional comments in brackets and bolded)

The bulk of American media is afraid to go after psychiatric drugs as a cause of violence. This fear stems, in part, from the sure knowledge that expert attack dogs are waiting in the wings, funded by big-time pharmaceutical companies.

There are doctors and researchers as well who have seen a dark truth about these drugs in the journals, but are afraid to stand up and speak out. After all, the medical culture punishes no one as severely as its own defectors.

And what of the federal government itself? The FDA licenses every drug released for public use and certifies that it is safe and effective. If a real tornado started at the public level, if the mothers of the young killers and young victims began to see a terrible knowledge about the psychiatric drugs swim into view, a knowledge they hadn’t imagined, and if THEY joined forces, the earth would shake.

After commenting on some of the adverse effects of the antidepressant drug Prozac, psychiatrist Peter Breggin notes, “From the initial studies, it was also apparent that a small percentage of Prozac patients became psychotic.”

Prozac, in fact, endured a rocky road in the press for a time. Stories on it rarely appear now. The major media have backed off. But on February 7th, 1991, Amy Marcus’ Wall Street Journal article on the drug carried the headline, “Murder Trials Introduce Prozac Defense.” She wrote, “A spate of murder trials in which defendants claim they became violent when they took the antidepressant Prozac are imposing new problems for the drug’s maker, Eli Lilly and Co.”

Also on February 7, 1991, the New York Times ran a Prozac piece headlined, “Suicidal Behavior Tied Again to Drug: Does Antidepressant Prompt Violence?”

In his landmark book, Toxic Psychiatry, Dr. Breggin mentions that the Donahue show (Feb. 28, 1991) “put together a group of individuals who had become compulsively self-destructive and murderous after taking Prozac and the clamorous telephone and audience response confirmed the problem.”

Breggin also cites a troubling study from the February 1990 American Journal of Psychiatry (Teicher et al, v.147:207-210) which reports on “six depressed patients, previously free of recent suicidal ideation, who developed intense, violent suicidal preoccupations after 2-7 weeks of fluoxetine [Prozac] treatment.’ The suicidal preoccupations lasted from three days to three months after termination of the treatment. The report estimates that 3.5 percent of Prozac users were at risk. While denying the validity of the study, Dista Products, a division of Eli Lilly, put out a brochure for doctors dated August 31, 1990, stating that it was adding `suicidal ideation’ to the adverse events section of its Prozac product information.”

An earlier study, from the September 1989 Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, by Joseph Lipiniski, Jr., indicates that, in five examined cases, people on Prozac developed what is called akathisia. Symptoms include intense anxiety, inability to sleep, the “jerking of extremities,” and “bicycling in bed or just turning around and around.” Breggin comments that akathisia “may also contribute to the drug’s tendency to cause self-destructive or violent tendencies … Akathisia can become the equivalent of biochemical torture and could possibly tip someone over the edge into self-destructive or violent behavior … The June 1990 Health Newsletter, produced by the Public Citizen Research Group, reports, ‘Akathisia, or symptoms of restlessness, constant pacing, and purposeless movements of the feet and legs, may occur in 10-25 percent of patients on Prozac.’”

The well-known publication, California Lawyer, in a December 1998 article called “Protecting Prozac,” mentions other highly qualified critics of the drug: “David Healy, MD, an internationally renowned psychopharmacologist, has stated in sworn deposition that `contrary to Lilly’s view, there is a plausible cause-and-effect relationship between Prozac’ and suicidal-homicidal events. An epidemiological study published in 1995 by the British Medical Journal also links Prozac to increased suicide risk.”

When pressed, proponents of these SSRI drugs sometimes say, “Well, the benefits for the general population far outweigh the risk,” or, “Maybe in one or two tragic cases the dosage prescribed was too high.” But the problem will not go away on that basis. A shocking review-study published in The Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases (1996, v.184, no.2), written by Rhoda L. Fisher and Seymour Fisher, called “Antidepressants for Children,” concludes: “Despite unanimous literature of double-blind studies indicating that antidepressants are no more effective than placebos in treating depression in children and adolescents, such medications continue to be in wide use.”

In wide use. This despite such contrary information and the negative, dangerous effects of these drugs.

There are other studies: “Emergence of self-destructive phenomena in children and adolescents during fluoxetine treatment,” published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (1991, vol.30), written by RA King, RA Riddle, et al. It reports self-destructive phenomena in 14% (6/42) of children and adolescents (10-17 years old) who had treatment with fluoxetine (Prozac) for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

July, 1991. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Hisako Koizumi, MD, describes a thirteen-year-old boy who was on Prozac: “full of energy,” “hyperactive,” “clown-like.” All this devolved into sudden violent actions which were “totally unlike him.” [Sound like James Holmes?]

September, 1991. The Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Author Laurence Jerome reports the case of a ten-year old who moves with his family to a new location. Becoming depressed, the boy is put on Prozac by a doctor. The boy is then “hyperactive, agitated … irritable.” He makes a “somewhat grandiose assessment of his own abilities.” Then he calls a stranger on the phone and says he is going to kill him. The Prozac is stopped, and the symptoms disappear.

[Note: What is true about Prozac is true about Paxil or Zoloft or any of the other SSRI antidepressants. And be warned: suddenly withdrawing from any psychiatric drug can be extremely dangerous to the patient. See www.breggin.com on this subject and how to handle it.]

Ritalin, manufactured by Novartis, is the close cousin to speed which is given to millions of American schoolchildren for a condition called Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), or ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder). ADD and ADHD, for which no organic causes have ever been found, are touted as disease-conditions that afflict the young, causing hyperactivity, unmanageability, and learning problems. Of course, when you name a disorder or a syndrome and yet can find no single provable organic cause for it, you have nothing more than a loose collection of behaviors with an arbitrary title.

Correction: you also have a pharmaceutical bonanza.

Dr. Breggin, referring to an official directory of psychiatric disorders, the DSM-III-R, writes that withdrawal from amphetamine-type drugs, including Ritalin, can cause “depression, anxiety, and irritability as well as sleep problems, fatigue, and agitation.” Breggin then remarks, “The individual may become suicidal in response to the depression.”

The well-known Goodman and Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics reveals a vital fact. It states that Ritalin is “structurally related to amphetamines … Its pharmacological properties are essentially the same as those of the amphetamines.” In other words, the only clear difference is legality. And the effects, in layman’s terms, are obvious. You take speed and, sooner or later, you start crashing. You become agitated, irritable, paranoid, delusional, aggressive.

In Toxic Psychiatry, Dr. Breggin discusses the subject of drug combinations: “Combining antidepressants [e.g., Prozac, Luvox] and psychostimulants [e.g., Ritalin] increases the risk of cardiovascular catastrophe, seizures, sedation, euphoria, and psychosis. Withdrawal from the combination can cause a severe reaction that includes confusion, emotional instability, agitation, and aggression.” Children are frequently medicated with this combination, and when we highlight such effects as aggression, psychosis, and emotional instability, it is obvious that the result is pointing toward the very real possibility of violence.

End excerpt.

To read the rest of this white paper, click here.

What does this all add up to? The fantasy evil portrayed in The Dark Knight Rises, and the real evil enacted by the shooters in the Aurora Century theater, has now given way to a more pervasive evil, as the mega-drug companies come to town to protect their money and their bankers and their fabricated reputation.

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

DR. FENTON, WHAT PSYCHIATRIC DRUGS DID YOU GIVE JAMES HOLMES?

By Jon Rappoport

July 27, 2012

www.nomorefakenewws.com

The news is out. As many suspected, James Holmes did have a psychiatrist. Her name is Dr. Lynne Fenton, and she is the medical director of student health services at the Anschutz campus of the U of Colorado, where Holmes was a graduate student.

So the burning question is: WHAT DRUGS WAS HOLMES ON?

The link between a number of psychiatric drugs and violence, including homicide, is well established. (Ritalin, Paxil, Zoloft, Prozac, etc.)

You can bet your bottom dollar that pharmaceutical companies and The American Psychiatric Association are VERY interested in Dr. Lynne Fenton at this moment. They want to know what drugs she prescribed for Holmes. Billions of dollars in drug profits are riding on the answers, because as soon as the name of one of these drugs pops out of the hopper, an avalanche of material is going to come with it: for example, the listed adverse effects, including its capacity to induce VIOLENCE. Which, in case you’re not getting the message, is called Bad Publicity. Very bad.

The news about Holmes and his psychiatrist emerged because Dr. Fenton was the person to whom Holmes addressed the package that was found two days ago in the mailroom at the Anschutz campus.

Holmes public defender, Tamara Brady, has filed a discovery motion to unearth the names of any and all government employees, including police, who leaked details of the contents of that package to the press. Attorney Brady claims this information—notes and drawings from Holmes about his plans to kill people—is privileged information between a patient and his doctor and should never have been disclosed.

Further, of course, these leaked details, Brady asserts, could prevent Holmes from obtaining a fair trial.

A hearing on the issue before a judge is scheduled for Monday.

Psychiatrist Fenton, according to CNN, sees between 15-20 students a week “for medication and psychotherapy.” She has been given grants to study schizophrenia. In the early 1990s, she was chief of physical medicine with the Air Force in San Antonio.

She’s between a rock and hard place right now.

If Holmes’ lawyer moves ahead with her plan to enter an insanity plea, Holmes’ psychiatric records will become grist for the mill. The prosecution will be able to demand those records, in order to argue that Holmes was sane at the time of the shootings.

It will be very interesting to see if some sort of deal is struck, whereby the prosecution views the records without disclosing the names of the drugs in court. It shouldn’t happen, but in this case, anything is possible, given the enormous pressure drug companies can exert. They will be talking to the prosecution YESTERDAY.

On the other hand, Holmes’ lawyer can argue her client was driven to violence by the drugs, in which case she will definitely name them, in order to try to win a verdict of temporary incapacitation.

There is a lot of jockeying going on here. We may even see Dr. Fenton state that she never gave drugs to Holmes. That would be a way out of this mess for everyone. Except James Holmes.

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

WAS JAMES HOLMES SET UP TO BE THE AURORA PATSY?

By Jon Rappoport

July 27, 2012

www.nomorefakenews.com

On movie and TV screens across the world, every day, we see played out the drama of hero versus villain, good versus evil.

In real life, people who can’t look below the surface of events feel a need to see evil incarnate somewhere, anywhere, without discernment, to point the finger at one person, to identify him, to know what he has done, to accuse him, to make him pay.

In this Virtual Age, if a group of men were planning such an event to satisfy the appetites of the crowd, the mob, the mass, why not twist together the real and the fictional, for maximum impact?

Why not merge the hero-villain myth of movies with a real villain who causes horrific death DURING a movie, as he personifies the fictional nemesis of the fictional hero?

Hence, James Holmes becomes The Joker.

To accomplish this insane and perverted scenario, adjustments would have to made. Holmes has little or no experience with guns. He knows nothing about explosives. He isn’t a professional in any sense of the word. He has never committed a crime before. If he has any qualification for the heinous operation, it is his vulnerability. He is adrift in his life. Never as brilliant a student as others thought him to be, he is failing in graduate school. He has no job and no prospects. What began as a potential career has dissolved. His interest in arcane aspects of neuroscience (temporal delusion—the possibility of changing the past), once a fascinating field of inquiry for him, now only contributes to his increasingly shaky grip on reality.

Would covert-op planners select him as an assassin or a patsy?

Is The Joker going to be the actual shooter in the Aurora theater, or is he going to be the young man holding the bag when the debacle is over?

Is he the killer or the sacrifice?

The planning is rather simple and direct. The actual killer(s) will enter the theater, while Holmes, who is drugged into a stupor and is sitting in his car, waits in the parking lot of the theater, among weapons and other gear that matches the killers’. Once the killers leave the theater, they’ll deposit their guns with him, as he lies in a semi-conscious blurred state. They’ll deposit gun residue on his body.

When the police find Holmes in his car (not at the theater exit or outside the car), he will surrender. Perhaps, under prior hypnosis, he was instructed to say his apartment is wired with explosives. Of course, the hired professionals did that intricate construction. And perhaps Holmes never tells the police about his apartment and explosives, and this information has really come from a tip.

Since the killer(s) was covered up from head to toe in the theater, there are no witnesses who can say Holmes wasn’t there.

Once upon a time, Lee Harvey Oswald was the patsy, the man who couldn’t have killed John Kennedy from the angle of his supposed perch in the Dallas Book Depository—additional evidence provided by the Zapruder film and the conclusion of the 1976 House Select Committee on Assassinations.

Once upon a time, Sirhan Sirhan was the patsy, who couldn’t have killed Robert Kennedy in the kitchen of the Los Angeles Ambassador Hotel, because he was standing in front of RFK and the bullets entered Kennedy’s body from behind. As with Holmes, a damning notebook was found. As with Holmes, there was a claim of amnesia.

Once upon a time, James Earl Ray was the patsy, who couldn’t have killed Martin Luther King at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis. There are several reasons, among which is the fact that the bullet that killed King did not match bullets test-fired from Ray’s rifle.

In each of these cases, the public and media outcry was enormous, and it was directed against the accused killer. The idea that Oswald, Sirhan, or Ray was innocent was considered preposterous and morbid. A hero had died; therefore the man arrested for the crime had to be guilty. The public demanded justice, and it could only be served by convicting the accused, in order to sustain the noble memory of the victim and demonstrate that good had conquered evil.

As for those who implicitly believe law enforcement “always catches their man” and witnesses who depart from the party line lie or can’t see straight, one need only look, for starters, at the FBI’s infamous COINTELPRO program, the history of CIA interventions in other nations, and numerous American police scandals to realize that, in many cases, the deck is stacked.

There is easily as much reason to believe that op planners were behind the Aurora murders, with Holmes as the patsy, as there is to believe Holmes planned and executed the whole thing himself.

And for symbology, you have the Dark Knight rising with Aurora, the goddess of dawn; the masked hero, Batman, and the masked murderer in the theater; The Joker who believes all existence is destruction, and destruction by the Joker in the theater; the forces of light and darkness—in other words, all the insanity of collective archetypes playing out on both the screen and in the theater.

The bad guy has been captured, the police have their story, the public buys in.

In John Marks’ famous book, Search for the Manchurian Candidate, one of three books that broke open the CIA’s MKULTRA mind-control program, Marks interviews “a CIA veteran” about the ability of hypnosis to produce a programmed assassin. The veteran doesn’t believe hypnosis can accomplish that. But, Marks writes:

“The veteran admits that none of the arguments he uses against a conditioned assassin would apply to a programmed ‘patsy’ whom a hypnotist could walk through a series of seemingly unrelated events…The purpose of this exercise is to leave a circumstantial trail that will make the authorities think the patsy committed a particular crime. The weakness might well be that the [patsy’s] amnesia would not hold up under police interrogation, but that would not matter if the police did not believe his preposterous story about being hypnotized or if he were shot resisting arrest. Hypnosis expert Milton Kline says he could create a patsy in three months—an assassin would take him six.”

If Holmes persists in his claim that he can’t remember the events of the night of the Batman massacre (which claim might be true), the court will order a psychiatric examination, to determine if Holmes is competent to participate in his own defense and stand trial.

If Holmes is ruled incompetent, then no trial can be held. Instead, he’ll be placed in a mental institution for treatment. Under Colorado law, he can’t be held in an institution for longer than he would serve in prison if found guilty of the charges against him. Well, those charges would bring a sentence of life in prison or execution.

However, if Holmes’ institutional psychiatrists decided there was no prospect for Holmes to regain his competence in the foreseeable future, he could actually be released. In this case, I’d predict the state of Colorado would find reasons to keep him in a mental institution for the rest of his life. He would become a John Hinckley, who has been incarcerated in St. Elizabeths Hospital since 1982, after trying to assassinate Ronald Reagan.

Incarceration of this kind, for James Holmes, would provide opportunities for drug treatment that would render him into a permanent state of brain-damaged confusion. The so-called neuroleptic drugs routinely cause motor brain damage.

Thus would a patsy be neutralized.

If Holmes is ruled, at some point, competent to stand trial and tries to say he was drugged, hypnotized, and set up, he’ll either be sent to a mental hospital for his “insane ideation,” or the trial will proceed and he’ll be found guilty. Again, neutralization.

There is also the possibility of suicide, or suicide by killing.

And the public will move on to the next spectacle of good versus evil, never noticing that the advancing Collectivism of the State, in an embrace with the Mega-Corporate Kingdom, is the overarching evil that is being concealed.

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

BATMAN MURDERS: NEW ASTONISHING CLUES

THE BLOOD TRAIL, THE NECK WOUND, THE 2ND GAS MASK

by Jon Rappoport

July 26, 2012

www.nomorefakenews.com

Citizen journalists are outdistancing everybody on the Batman murders. I’m not even sure I have their names matched up correctly to their reports, so for now I’m not publishing the names, but I’ll give you the links to their videos and commentary.

Here’s what I’m inferring from their work. First, the heavy blood trail outside the Aurora theater, in the back parking lot, has been wrongly attributed to a neck wound suffered by one of the victims, Allie Young. When viewed in the hospital, her scar doesn’t look serious enough to account for a massive blood loss, and the wound isn’t even dressed. Why would anyone lie about this?

Because the blood in the parking lot may have come from a girl who was killed or abducted by one of the killers.

Knowingly or unknowingly, Obama contributed to the cover story about Allie Young in his incorrect description of her ordeal and wound.

There was a second gas mask found lying outside the theater at the back of the building. This would not have been Holmes’ mask. It would have belonged to a second killer.

I’m not saying the meaning of these clues I’ve just listed is airtight and absolutely final. I’m saying they send the case in entirely new directions.

They definitely add fuel to the conclusion that Aurora Police Chief, Daniel Oates was wrong when he issued the familiar mantra that Homes acted alone. On what basis could Oates have made that claim? Was he intentionally lying? Was he trying to save his reputation, and hiding the fact that at least one other killer was running loose, uncaptured by his men? Oates, an old New York street cop, had risen through the ranks and, as Aurora police chief, presided over a 30% reduction in the crime rate—until the Batman murders.

These clues—the blood trail, the neck wound, the second gas mask—any police investigator should have run with them. The absence of a serious probe indicates we are looking at a cover-up.

Here are the links to the work of the citizen journalists. That’s what I call them because I don’t have a better label. They are breaking new ground on the case, and they deserve your praise and support:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpbPy7TKe7E

http://willyloman.wordpress.com

http://www.degaray.com/?p=2488

We still have the matter of how James Holmes gained entrance to the theater. There is the side door, the fire exit. Did he kick it in from the outside, as KUSA-TV reported? Did he, as Bloomberg claims the police say, buy a ticket, watch the movie, stand, as if he was taking a phone call, and walk out, propping open the side exit as he left, to return later with armor and weapons?

Or, as eyewitness Corbin Dates told CNN, did “someone” in the theater take a phone call, disappear in the direction of the side exit, after which (15-20 minutes? an hour?) the shooter, in full gear, came into the theater from that direction?

The first description—kicking in the exit door—is highly unlikely, since exit doors generally open out from the inside, are heavy, and are locked from the outside.

If Holmes propped open the side door, left, and came back later, other customers in the theater and theater employees might have seen light coming in from the outside. Did they? Someone also might have walked over and shut the door.

All this needs to be nailed down.

Then we have the packages (2) in the mailroom of the U. of Colorado, Anschutz campus. Press reports indicate a professor of psychiatry at the school called police because there was a package (with no indication of the sender) in the mailroom, addressed to him. The professor suspected it might have been sent by Holmes. This turned out to be wrong. That package had no bearing on the case. But in a search of the mailroom, ANOTHER package was found, which had been sent by Holmes to the professor. It had been sitting there as long as a week before its discovery on July 23rd. It contained a notebook, and the notebook contained Holmes’ descriptions of how he was going to kill people.

This one is hard to believe. The professor believes one package was sent by Holmes. Why? BUT the police happen to find another package that was. Was it planted (and forged) to build a stronger case against Holmes?

I have new information about the availability of Holmes’ medical records. This would pertain to a criminal trial. It is likely Holmes’ lawyer could subpoena any medical/psychiatric records, in order to establish the state of mind of her client, and these records of course would include what drugs were prescribed. Once that is known, a case could be mounted based on the drugs’ propensity to cause violent behavior, including homicide. The prosecution could also subpoena these records if Holmes entered an insanity plea.

My guess is that Torrence Brown’s lawsuit against Holmes’ doctors would come after a criminal trial (if there is one), at which time the medical/psychiatric records would have already been unsealed and would be available.

Remember, there is still no known witness-ID of Holmes in the theater. There is only the police claim that they found him, calm and confessing, next to his car, after the shooting—or by other accounts, inside his car.

I’ve seen raw cell phone video footage of people outside the theater on the night of the shooting, but no footage from inside the theater. Someone inside had to be recording a piece of what was going on. We have to ask ourselves: where is that footage? Has it been confiscated?

Here are relevant links to the theater exit door and the mailed packages:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/07/20/deadly-shooting-colorado-movie-theater-dark-knight-rises/

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/07/25/exclusive-movie-massacre-suspect-laid-out-plans-in-package-mailed-to/

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-21/colorado-shooting-kills-12-at-movie-police-arrest-suspect.html

On we go…

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

Bigger secret: Holmes’ accomplices or his doctors?

By Jon Rappoport

July 25, 2012

Even a FOX news affiliate is now asking who helped Holmes in the Batman murders in Aurora. Where did Holmes get the money for all his weapons and gear purchases? Who showed him how to rig his apartment with a sophisticated array of explosives (or did the rigging for him)? Who let Holmes in through the side exit door in the theater?

No major media outlet, however, has yet asked who Holmes’ doctors are.

But a young man, Torrence Brown, who was in the Aurora theater last Friday night during the shooting has retained a Beverly Hills lawyer, Donald Karpel. Business Insider (linked at infowars) states that Torrence Brown is filing a lawsuit against Warner Brothers, the theater, and Holmes’ doctors, who “prescribed many medications without keeping an eye [on] their patient, [attorney] Karpel argued.”

The odds are Karpel doesn’t know who those doctors are, but if the lawsuit advances he may get a chance to find out. Clearly, the plan is to interview these physicians during the discovery process and lay bare their drug-treatment protocols for James Holmes.

It’s an open secret that Ritalin, Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Wellbutrin, and other psychiatric medications can and do cause violent behavior, including suicide and homicide.

Here’s the catch. Citing doctor-patient confidentiality, these physicians can refuse to disclose what drugs they gave Holmes, making the lawsuit difficult to pursue in this area.

Assuming Holmes did (or does) have prescribing doctors, the doctors can simply state they saw no unusual drug-induced behavior on Holmes’ part and leave it at that.

Attorney Karpel may have to work the case from another angle: find witnesses who can reliably state what medications Holmes was on, and then track them to his doctors.

Don’t assume this is a walk in the park. You can be sure the American Psychiatric Association and the companies that manufacture the drugs in question have eyeballs on Aurora right now. These players don’t want the truth to come out: the drugs cause people to commit murder.

There is a tight fit between these players, and the cops, the FBI, and prosecutors in the Holmes case. Why? Because all parties want a smooth road to a guilty verdict. They don’t want a jury deciding that psychiatric meds impelled Holmes to commit murder. Therefore, it’s probable that law-enforcement people on the scene in Aurora are combing through witnesses and telling them not to speak about the case. This happened in the 1999 Columbine school shootings, where it finally emerged that one of the shooters, Eric Harris, was on Luvox, an SSRI antidepressant that can push a person over the edge into mania and violence.

In the fall of 2011, in Canada, Judge Robert Heinrichs ruled that a 16-year old, who suddenly stabbed his friend to death, “no longer poses a risk to anyone and that his mental deterioration and resulting violence would not have taken place without exposure to Prozac.” The judge therefore refused to send the case to an adult court, where the sentence for the 16-year old would have been much more severe. From the point of view of law enforcement, this is the kind of “complication” that can jump out of the box when the medical drugs take center stage.

Mainstream reporters can demand to know what meds Holmes may have been on. Yes, they can. They can apply pressure. But there is an obstacle. The companies these reporters work for survive on pharmaceutical advertising. A journalist (who shall remain nameless) who once worked for a major US newspaper told me the following story: his paper ran a piece that questioned the safety of vaccines; the next day, a gaggle of suits carrying briefcases marched into the newsroom and headed straight for the editor’s office; the suits were from the company who made one of the vaccines named in the article; the company was also a buyer of significant ad space in the newspaper; the suits proceeded to blast the editor, as if he worked for them.

Well, in a real sense, he did.

UPDATE: Fox News is now reporting that Holmes mailed a package to a University of Colorado psychiatrist before the killings, where it has sat in the mailroom, undelivered. The package contains a notebook, in which Holmes laid out “details about how he was going to kill people.”

This Aurora psychiatrist is also a professor at the University. His name is not disclosed. No one in law enforcement will reveal what’s in the notebook. A judge has already placed a gag order on it. Of course, the real question is: who is the psychiatrist and was he treating Holmes? If so, with what drugs?

Combing through the extensive faculty directory of the department of psychiatry at the U. of Colorado (Anschutz Medical campus), I find six names, just from w-z, who fit the bill as both psychiatrists and teachers. It’s a long list.

Stay tuned.

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

WERE THE BATMAN MURDERS A COVERT OP?

By Jon Rappoport

July 24, 2012

www.nomorefakenews.com

The obvious way to begin an investigation is to look at the event itself for any obvious contradictions or unexplained details.

For example, in the Batman murders, we have two witnesses who were in the theater and implied there were accomplices.

One witness, Corbin Dates (aka Dayton), told Aurora news outlets a man sitting in the front row took a cell phone call and went to a side exit, propped the door open with his foot, and seemed to be signaling somebody. Ten to 15 minutes later, James Holmes appeared in full gear with weapons as the exit door swung open The other witness (no name as yet) stated that, during the massacre, a gas canister was thrown from a direction where Homes wasn’t.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-fcD7pyfL8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4MW_qhAPAU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hoaiw2jrpmE&NR=1

Despite the statements of these apparent witnesses, Aurora Chief of Police Daniel Oates claims he is sure James Holmes acted alone.

But we need to back up. First of all, neither witness actually IDed Holmes. They IDed a man who was dressed in black from head to toe, wore a helmet, body armor, and a gas mask. Actually, no one has identified Holmes as the man in the theater. How could they? His face and body were covered and concealed.

How did the shooter get into the theater? Clad in black, wearing body armor, carrying several weapons, he buys a ticket and walks in with everyone else? Authorities suggest he came through a side door. If so, how did he know the door would be unlocked? After a few months of meticulous planning, he simply hoped it would be?

Watching these two witnesses being interviewed by TV news reporters is extremely frustrating. The reporters have their hands on potentially explosive information and they don’t follow up. Nor do they press police for comments on the witness statements.

Nevertheless, from what we can provisionally surmise about the crime scene, there are huge gaps in the official scenario—if we can even call it a scenario.

Standing out above everything else is the fact that no one can ID Holmes as the shooter.

We are told by police that, after Holmes was done killing people in the theater, he exited a side door (the same door through which he had entered?), stood quietly, and surrendered himself to the authorities. This, too, is unclear. The police were already stationed at the exit door? Holmes waited until they arrived? Was he still holding weapons?

It’s said he was calm. He gave himself up.

After killing scores of people and wounding others, the first-time shooter was calm? How could this be? Well, drugs would enter the equation. What drugs? Vicodin. Others? Where were these drugs obtained? Who wrote the prescriptions? Where is the doctor? Why have we heard nothing about a doctor? What, exactly, going back into childhood, is Holmes’ pharmaceutical history?

If this was a true covert op, it would have been easy for a pro shooter to decimate the people in the theater, slip out the exit door with his accomplice or accomplices, where the patsy, Holmes, drugged, was waiting with other operatives. After dousing Holmes with gunpowder residue, the pros left the scene, disappeared into the night, leaving a pre-programmed Holmes there to confess to the crime and state that his apartment was rigged with explosives.

If this is how things happened, it would explain how Holmes, possessed of no apparent knowledge about constructing bombs, could have had his apartment wired with exotic devices. Holmes didn’t put them together. The pros did.

At Holmes’ court appearance on Monday, he certainly looked drugged as he moved slowly in the courtroom and sat in his chair. If so, who gave him the drugs in jail?

Of course, huge gaps exist in Holmes’ life story. We have no explanation for his transformation from a young eager science student into a blank-faced defendant in a mass-murder case. Had he ever been to see a psychiatrist? If so, what drugs were prescribed? Ritalin, which can cause violent behavior? Antidepressants, which can cause violent behavior?

Had he ever been enrolled in a clinical trial of an experimental drug? During his brief matriculation at the University of Colorado, Denver, had he been used in a neuroscience experiment? The web page for the University neuroscience department, where Holmes studied on a government grant, has been taken down.

One oddity about the investigation of the killings: the FBI presence is minimal. We don’t know what the FBI is doing behind the scenes, but by contrast, in the 1999 Columbine massacre the FBI was all over the scene in a very visible way. They interviewed witnesses, processed evidence, and made public statements. Here, they’re in the background. Why?

I offer one possible explanation. In Columbine, the FBI became a lightning rod for doubts and questions, and accusations of overlooking/suppressing evidence that would lead to more than two shooters. Here in Aurora, it’s all local: “we have the killer, he’s in jail, the case is proceeding, nothing to see, move along.” This appears to be an intentional strategy. Keep it simple, don’t stir up the populace.

We’ll have to watch, as the disposition of the court case unfolds, to see whether the “simple” strategy is extended. Perhaps we’ll have a guilty plea and a quick sentence. Or perhaps court-appointed psychiatrists will decide Holmes is incompetent to cooperate in his own defense, in which case he’ll be remanded to a mental facility for a period of time, after which he’ll quietly enter a guilty plea and be sentenced. But what does “incompetent” mean? Drugged into submission?

I believe there are specific items of evidence which, if known, would provoke new questions on top of the witness statements above. For example, was an older model (outdated) police car seen leaving the area of the theater after the shootings? What was the blood evidence on Holmes’ clothing and shoes? Whose blood was it? Did it belong to victims inside the theater? Was Holmes, as he stood at the exit to the theater and surrendered himself, covered in more blood than he would have accumulated as a shooter? In other words, was he set up as the designated patsy?

And are there more witnesses in the theater who saw accomplices? If so, as in Columbine, they will, no doubt, be told by law enforcement to keep quiet. If there is a trial, will Corbin Dates and the other anonymous witness mentioned above be asked to testify? The chances are slim to none.

If the Batman murders are indeed a covert op, the motives behind it don’t need much explanation. The UN Arms Trade Treaty, which has been under final discussions in New York since July 3^rd, and is due to wrap up on July 27^th, is a new step in the direction of gun confiscation, despite its announced aim of limiting only the export of weapons from one nation to another. Once the Treaty is signed, it will need senate ratification to go into effect and impact the 2^nd Amendment. That ratification is the hard part for gun-control advocates. The tragedy at the Batman premier on July 20 could act as a pressure wave-front on senators to rubber-stamp the treaty.

Other motives to stage the shootings in Aurora? The manufacture of a consensus for massive “crime prevention,” and that means the extended use of medical drugs to influence behavior and the brain toward the goal of passivity and conformity—with the victims ENJOYING IT. (See Soma, the drug of choice in Huxley’s Brave New World.)

“Say something, see something” is only part of the picture. Creating a nation of snitches is certainly on the DHS’s to-do list. But we are in the Century of the Brain. Researchers are eager to pawn off their discoveries for the development of technology that can literally limit behavior and thought. Behind the facade of “curing mental disorders,” this is where brain research is heading. Free will and choice are considered flimsy outmoded notions that need to be cast aside, so the Brave New World can emerge. James Holmes becomes a classic case of a man whose brain needs “restructuring.” The globalist technocrats want every inch they can win in the battle to convince the public that brain manipulation holds a promising future for the human race. Of course, their idea of the future is synaptic and neuronal control. Holmes is one more poster child for their chilling agenda.

Brad Garrett, a former FBI profiler and now an analyst for ABC News, is one of the prime go-to experts who deliver pronouncements on mass murderers. Garrett supplies the public perception of these killers.

Here are his off-the-shelf conclusions about James Holmes: “[Mass killers are] insecure, they start having, perhaps, dark thoughts that people are following them or that there are voices—auditory voices—that are directing them…some version of this happened to Mr. Holmes…the onset of whatever this chemical imbalance might be, it starts taking over, and he starts withdrawing…”

It’s a well-recognized fact that there are no chemical or biological tests to confirm a diagnosis of any so-called mental disorder. The whole hypothesis of “chemical imbalance” as the basis for mental disease is just that, a hypothesis. Nevertheless, Garrett promotes it as if it’s accepted science, and he doubles down by suggesting that Holmes was hearing voices directing his actions.

But psychiatric drugs (e.g., Ritalin, Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, Haldol, etc.), used to curb mental problems, instead actually CAUSE patients to experience paranoia and hallucinations and withdraw—and plan and commit violence. It’s the drugs. Garrett is providing cover to explain Holmes’ actions as mental illness, when in fact he knows nothing about what Holmes experienced or why. If Holmes was, in fact, a mind-control subject, that is hidden behind psychobabble.

Garrett supplies exactly the kind of narrative that calls for “early intervention,” prevention of crime throughout society before it occurs, which, in the hands of brain researchers, means chemical and other means of controlling “anti-social” impulses.

It is noteworthy that a young neuroscience student, Holmes, who was at one point studying “the biological basis of mental disorders,” winds up as an accused mass murderer who is “obviously deranged” and “suffering from a chemical imbalance in the brain.”

At this point, we go down the rabbit hole, and the pieces of the puzzle are strange and tantalizing.

A video has emerged of Holmes, at age 18, six years ago, lecturing to fellow attendees at a science summer camp at Miramar College in San Diego.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lotOPjLlbDU

Holmes explains he has been studying temporal illusions and subjective experience. A temporal illusion, he states, is the idea that you can change the past.

At the Cannonfire blog (http://cannonfire.blogspot.com) there are comic-book panels posted from what Joseph Cannon calls “the most famous passage in the most famous of all Joker stories, Alan Moore’s ‘The Killing Joke.’”

The Joker is asked: “I mean, what is it with you? What made you the way you are? Girlfriend killed by the mob? Maybe brother carved up by some mugger…?”

The Joker replies: “Something like that happened to me, you know…I’m not exactly sure what it was. Sometimes I remember it one way, sometimes another…if I’m going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice! Ha ha ha!”

James Holmes, at 18 years of age, said he was studying temporal illusion, “the idea that you can change the past,” a feat the fictional Joker had obviously accomplished.

In the last ten years, the film that explored this subject—and Holmes’ other interest, the subjectivity of experience—most deeply, through its treatment of dreams and the insertion of synthetic experience in the mind, was Inception, directed by Christopher Nolan, who of course also directed the recent Batman trilogy, including The Dark Knight Rises. In yet another version of changing the past, in 2000 Nolan directed Memento, which unraveled its story backwards, as a victim of anterograde amnesia, who can’t store memories, tries to revenge his wife’s murder by leaving clues for himself that will lead him to the identity of her killer.

Are we simply talking about a neuroscience student’s (Holmes’) interest in comics and films, or did he participate in experiments that attempted to alter his subjective view of the world and his own past?

For example, there is wealth of information about the criminal experiments conducted by Canadian psychiatrist, Dr. Ewan Cameron, who operated with funding from the CIA during the 1950s. Cameron ran MKULTRA Subproject 68, during which he used massive electroshocks, sensory isolation, drug-induced periods of sleep (7-10 days), and audiotapes of “re-patterning” commands to attempt to wipe out patients’ pasts, their memories, their former subjective mindsets, their very personalities—in favor of recreating these patients as “new and improved people.”

As a teen, Holmes interned at the Salk Institute in San Diego. Salk carries out studies using functional MRI, a technique of brain mapping that involves correlating read-outs with various mental activities. It’s only speculation at this point, but somewhere along the line, did Holmes participate in such experiments, and were the results used to map regions of his brain for later inputs, so someone could achieve behavioral/thought control over him?

To even suggest Holmes may be a mind-control subject brings immediate criticism, to which I would offer this counter: why accept the scenario of the crime put forward by the Aurora police? Why do they deserve the benefit of the doubt? Why limit and narrow the investigation to their story?

Was law enforcement correct about the JFK and RFK and MLK assassinations? Was law enforcement correct about the Columbine massacre, in which 101 witnesses state they saw other shooters? Was law enforcement correct about the lone duo of plotters in the Oklahoma bombing? Was law enforcement correct about 9/11?

In all cases—no.

I’ll tell you this. If the authorities really wanted to know what makes James Holmes tick (a prospect I strongly doubt), their best chance would be to send someone into his cell who could talk to him about Christopher Nolan, Inception, Memento, functional MRI, the TV series Lost — which contained time-travel themes and was a show he and his friend, Ritchie Duong, used to watch together every week when they attended UC Riverside. Talk to Holmes about what he wants to talk about. Who knows what would eventually unravel?

It might be far more than the police wish to uncover.

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com