The great big Autism obfuscation

by Jon Rappoport

March 28, 2019

(To join our email list, click here.)

“How is a self-contained world built? Well, you can take a major situation which has an obvious cause, and then relabel the situation with a new name and say the cause is unknown. Then you can claim you’re looking for the cause, and you can keep looking and stalling for 50 years.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

First of all, there is NO definitive evidence that autism is a specific condition with a single cause.

If you doubt this, look up the definition of autism in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and try to find a definitive lab test that leads to a diagnosis of autism. There is no such test.

That means there is no confirmed cause of autism. And THAT means there is no proof autism is a single and specific condition.

Like other so-called developmental disorders or neurological disorders, autism is a collection of behaviors and symptoms, clustered together by committees of psychiatrists.

Basically, what is being called autism is DAMAGE. Various forms of neurological damage.

This means the cause(s) could be coming from a variety of places.

For example, vaccines can and do cause damage.

Neurological damage, brain damage.

Parents of damaged children know this. There were there. They saw their children before vaccination and after vaccination.

Everything else claimed about these children is diversion. High-class sophisticated deceptive diversion.

For example: shuffling various disease and disorder labels; studies claiming there is no link between vaccines and autism; the hoops the government makes parents jump through, in order to try to obtain financial compensation for their damaged children; the legal deal allowing vaccine manufacturers to avoid law suits; the invented cover stories claiming autism begins in utero or is a genetic disorder; the pretension that autism has even been defined—

All lies. All avoidances.

A child gets a vaccine. The child suffers brain damage. That happens.

That’s the truth which the government buries in a mountain of obfuscation.

In general, how much damage do vaccines cause every year in the US?

Unsurprisingly, there is no reliable count.

For a sane reference, see “In the Wake of Vaccines,” by Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the private National Vaccine Information Center. Her article was published in the Sept./Oct. 2004 issue of Mothering Magazine.

Gathering information from several sources, Fisher makes a reasonable estimate of vaccine damage—actual figures are not available or carefully tracked or vetted. The system for reporting adverse effects is broken.

Fisher: “But how many children have [adverse] vaccine reactions every year? Is it really only one in 110,000 or one in a million who are left permanently disabled after vaccination? Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler observed in 1993 that less than 1 percent of doctors report adverse events following prescription drug use. [See DA Kessler, ‘Introducing MEDWatch,’ [JAMA, June 2, 1993: 2765-2768]”

“There have been estimates that perhaps less than 5 or 10 percent of doctors report hospitalizations, injuries, deaths, or other serious health problems following vaccination. The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act contained no legal sanctions for not reporting; doctors can refuse to report and suffer no consequences.”

“Even so, each year about 12,000 reports [of vaccine damage] are made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System; parents as well as doctors can make those reports. [See RT Chen, B. Hibbs, ‘Vaccine safety,’ Pediatric Annals, July 1998: 445-458]”

“However, if that number represents only 10 percent of what is actually occurring, then the actual number may be 120,000 vaccine-adverse events [damage]. If doctors report vaccine reactions as infrequently as Dr. Kessler said they report prescription-drug reactions, and the number 12,000 is only 1 percent of the actual total, then the real number may be 1.2 million vaccine-adverse events annually.”

Then why does the government say, over and over, that vaccines are safe?

Because they want to lie.

What about all the studies that show this vaccine and that vaccine are safe?

The following quote will give you a clue. The writer is an insider’s insider, and a doctor. She’s scrutinized more published medical studies than all the “highly educated” science-blog writers in the world put together.

Dr. Marcia Angell, for 20 years, was the editor of the most prestigious medical journal in America.

On January 15, 2009, the NY Review of Books published Dr. Angell’s devastating assessment of medical literature:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (Marcia Angell, MD, “Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption.” NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)

Vaccine damage is being called autism.

It diverts attention from the grave harm vaccines are causing.

Autism is essentially any kind of severe neurological damage a child suffers from unknown causes.

When the cause is obvious and known—as in the case of vaccines—the names and labels are changed:

To protect the guilty.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

25 comments on “The great big Autism obfuscation

  1. Laura Spencer says:

    I read the stories from moms of injured children daily. On behalf of them, thank you for being a voice of clarity in the midst of all the obfuscation.

  2. Al Soto says:

    This is the most straight forward explanation of the reality around this I have ever read, thanks for the clarity in your writing. I believe this will be used (your writing) in some future class rooms as a comparison and contrast between reality and manufactured fantasy. How can it be that we can see this so simply and we are where we are? The near future is going to be very interesting….and disheartening. peace and love

  3. NWO Reporter says:

    Great article. Obfuscation, lies and deception are the foundation of the vaccine paradigm. It’s no exaggeration to say the vaccine industry would not exist without them.

    It’s possible to estimate the risk of serious injury or death from vaccination, based on the CDC’s analysis of compensation awards in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

    The U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration tells us that, ““According to the CDC, from 2006 to 2016 over 3.1 billion doses of covered vaccines were distributed in the U.S. For petitions filed in this time period, 5,531 petitions were adjudicated by the Court, and of those 3,749 were compensated. This means for every one million doses of vaccine that were distributed, one individual was compensated.”

    This finding is deliberately made to sound as if the risk of vaccine injury is “1-in-a-million,” and it’s parroted in vaccine propaganda all the time–again, a deception. That’s not what the finding actually says at all–far from it.

    But the CDC’s finding can be used as a starting point, along with an estimate of the percentage of compensable vaccine injury claims actually filed in the VICP (probably between 1% [or less] and 10%), to come up with an estimate of the risk of serious injury or death from vaccination.

    Based on the CDC’s own findings, the risk of serious injury or death by vaccine for a fully but minimally vaccinated child (50 doses) is likely between 1-in-100 and 1-in-1800.

    http://www.virginiastoner.com/writing/2018/10/13/when-1-in-a-million-really-means-1-in-100-and-other-vaccine-chicanery

  4. Mark Baumann says:

    Thank you for writing this and availing it to us!
    I am often quickly lost for words in a vaccine dialog and this is my new ‘go to’ reference.
    A friend of mine actually said in anger, “YOU THINK YOUR GOING TO TELL ME THAT I HURT MY KIDS BY GIVING THEM VACCINATIONS!” I was completely lost for words.

    • Sue says:

      Guilt is a strong motive for denial. When my mother read my book on the subject of vaccines (which she never would have read if her own daughter hadn’t written it), the first thing she said to me was, “Parents will feel guilty,”

      I’ve found that another motive to engage in denial is not having the desire or ability to concentrate, discern, and/or comprehend, so it’s just easier to believe what one has been spoon-fed by the self-appointed corporate “experts.”

      It is sad, though, to hear these people repeat the catch-phrases they’ve been taught, like “Vaccine herd immunity” (which doesn’t exist), and “Vaccines eliminated polio and smallpox” (they never studied the history of epidemics and vaccines, but accept the profiting industry-revised-edition), and “That phony doctor who was debunked” (yeah, like Dr. Semmelweis, who was ostracized during his time for having the impertinence to instruct other physicians in proper hygiene).

  5. AmaraGrace says:

    Thank You Jon for reporting on this. I’d like to suggest you update your source materials… since Fisher’s 2004 article there has been a dramatic increase in VAERS reports – its in the ballpark of 30,000 yearly by now. And there has been a more recent study accomplished in 2010 that shows again, and more definitively, that less than 1% of vaccine injuries are reported. The Harvard-Pilgrim study by Lazarus was suddenly & without explanation abandoned mid-process by the CDC when it revealed the number of vaccine injuries identified & reported by the automatic computer program reporting system being developed for this purpose as 90% – 99% higher than before the study began. Here is the final report, which has been disseminated & reported on in spite of the shocking CDC rejection: https://healthit.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
    Notice how the developers of the system report that the CDC simply stopped answering their phone calls requesting to proceed with the completion of their study commissioned by them after the preliminary reports showed the initial results. 30,000 reports yearly representing 1% of 3,000,000 unreported adverse events from vaccine injections alone….and this information is NOT WANTED, as you stated. The vaccine paradigm is coming apart at the seams… a county in NY has this week issued a ban on unvaccinated children in public places; I look forward to your reporting on the unfolding of this latest Human Rights infringement by the ConMed-puppeted government.

    Blessings on your House & on your grief process.

    • AmaraGrace says:

      OOPS… Correction: 2018 saw 58,381 adverse event reports to VAERS…x100 = 5,838,100 vaccine adverse events – 99% unreported because the medical system is taught in all med & nursing school courses that “adverse reactions are 1 in a million” = they don’t recognize what’s endemic when its right in front of their eyes. Iatrogenesis is a hard thing to admit… so much easier to just overlook asking the questions about the mushrooming rates of childhood cancers, autism, diabetes, autoimmune disorders… chronic disorders & illnesses that are new to the past 2 generations of our babies & children. Business is booming in the for-profit American medical industry.

  6. Great article. It’s as if all these once separated battle fronts are starting to join up … Autism/Vaccines, problems with various pharmaceuticals, psychiatric drugs, botched or unnecessary surgery, and on and on, that all have their separate support and lobby groups. But we’re finding out we’re all fighting the same fight against a common enemy that has forgotten how to care. The enemy seem to roll out this emotional blackmail kind of thing where they accuse people of “standing in the way of progress”, or “keeping people away from life saving medical treatments”, as if simply shouting up about bad doctors is supposed to be some kind of critical attack on an entire would view. That world view got us to the Moon and back, why on Earth can’t it simply stand up for what is right in medical care ? Are these guys just fakes, even almost aliens, alienated from what it really means to be human ? I just know it has to be stopped.

    In my area there has been a huge scandal. It was Terrence Mckenna who cited John Silverman – https://www.esalen.org/page/julian-silverman

    “Significant differences between acute schizophrenics and shamans ***are not*** found in the sequence of underlying psychological events that define their abnormal experiences.”

    Source: Shamans and Acute Schizophrenia, Silverman – https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1525/aa.1967.69.1.02a00030

    R D Laing proved that Schizophrenics can be cured without drugs; he allowed them to go through the process in a safe house with no drugs and they came out the other end “Weller than well” as Laing put it. This is a huge scandal. We have known THE CURE to Schizophrenia for at least 50 years. How many life’s have been ruined ? How many people who could have returned with basically many, many Holy Grails have not been allowed to complete the Shamanic experience ? How many gifts have been stolen away from society by these grade A ass holes ? And when do we get to kick them out because I have my popcorn ready here.

  7. Thank you for this most important piece, Jon. The autism injury gets even worse when the parents STILL don’t realise it was the vaccines and continue to vaccinate 🙁 …going on to injure more of their children 🙁 This crap HAS TO STOP!

  8. Not So Free says:

    First of all, there is NO definitive evidence that autism is a specific condition with a single cause. Quote from article
    It appears the same is true of polio.

    • Theodore says:

      it never ceases to amaze me what debilitating physical impairments can manifest when certain man-made chemical compounds and certain metal amalgams reach their way into the human blood stream and into the motor-function-controlling nerve tendons…

  9. Tim says:

    Another angle is, go see the statistics from other countries, that have different vaccination programs, or restricted, smaller programs. Norway. Etc. Damage rates can them be seen by differential analysis. Some countries have damage rates, that the US used to have before the modern vaccination mania started. So it becomes obvious, it is the vaccines. The vaccine juggernaut wants all those comparison populations to vanish, so the obvious problem in the US becomes ‘there is no comparison group’.

    Of course Jon is right, all those parents that knew their kids before and after, when the issues started. The parents know.

    And the cult that is the orthodox ‘science’…. complexity is used to hide simplicity.

  10. Butch says:

    A modified to fit our times saying…..The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is to have truth tellers silenced. It’s well under way.

  11. Wilhelmina Modig says:

    Hang on, wait a minute…

    “First of all, there is NO definitive evidence that autism is a specific condition with a single cause. If you doubt this, look up the definition of autism in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and try to find a definitive lab test that leads to a diagnosis of autism. There is no such test. That means there is no confirmed cause of autism. And THAT means there is no proof autism is a single and specific condition.”

    So there has to be a LAB TEST in order for a diagnosis to be accurate? Well, then I guess MOST diagnoses in the DSM are invalid. Too bad for all those people, am I right?
    As for the “definition” of autism in the DSM (I just happen to have DSM-5 right here on the shelf next to me – adding a link to the diagnostic criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder below), it’s pretty straight forward.

    I myself would today be diagnosed with “ASD, level 1”. I WAS however (finally, at the age of 28) diagnosed back in 1998 according to the DSM-IV criteria, and I don’t need to be reevaluated.
    Just because there isn’t a one-size-fits-all CAUSE, or a LAB TEST that can be conducted, that doesn’t mean the CONDITION ITSELF isn’t real. Vaccines did NOT cause my autism. -Mrs. entryreqrd #ActuallyAutistic #BornThisWay
    —————————
    https://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/assets/basc-3/basc3resources/DSM5_DiagnosticCriteria_AutismSpectrumDisorder.pdf

  12. Scott says:

    Vaccines aren’t the only possible causes of brain damage and/or autism. The medical establishment have been giving children and infants psychiatric drugs such as anti-psychotics.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/11/us/psychiatric-drugs-are-being-prescribed-to-infants.html

    Those pharmaceuticals do a lot of damage as well.

    I think that malnutrition also contributes to personality, cognitive and behavioral issues.

    • Sue says:

      Yet, vaccines are most often the gateway for the other drugs to be introduced.

      Vaccines cause both mental and physical disturbances which often provide the excuse to prescribe other drugs. And then side effects from those drugs open the door to prescribe yet more drugs.

      I recently saw a TV ad for a drug to treat “twitching,” which the ad admits is a consequence of taking another “important” and “necessary” drug to treat bipolar disorder.

      And on and on it goes.

  13. Lucy says:

    All one needs to know is that
    in late 1970s when children were far healthier, the prescribed no of childhood vaccines was around 9. Today it is upwards of 40 or 50.

    9 vaccines ..vs………..50 vaccines.

    .

    • Sue says:

      When the truth is known (and it takes a lot of digging through the well placed mountain of manure), all vaccines are all poison, all the time, in all doses.

      There is a law in nature called “Survival of The Fittest.” Throughout the ages, through plagues and epidemics, the strongest physical specimens made it through, and adapted. As impersonal and callous as that may seem, that’s how it is in the material world.

      Man’s attempt to mimic natural laws by his own unnatural (and systemically damaging) methods has essentially assured that there will be no fittest left. And somewhere along the way, the Elite (who I am very sure do not submit to vaccination, themselves) came to understand that fact, which is why vaccines are an integral part of the depopulation program.

      • Kenz Rhodes says:

        Very true. One thing that I found of interest when I pulled the CDC’s stat sheet on numbers of “vaccine preventable infectious diseases” since 1950 – found here at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/E/reported-cases.pdf- is that the number of deaths relative to the number of cases for the vast majority of the listed childhood illness prior to the vaccine introduction was very, very small. For instance; measles, in 1962–a year before the measles vaccine, had 385,156 recorded cases and 364 deaths– a lethality rate of just .0009. Similar story with the other common ailments; very, very low lethality rates. The data simply does not support the narratives about “dire threats to public health” from not vaccinating that the scum-of-the-earth media trumpets on behalf of its pharmaceutical gods, as clearly there was not a significant change of death by infection even before the vaccines were introduced. And something else? Even AFTER introduction of the vaccines, when the numbers of cases began to decline from year to year, the lethality rates were not really affected. Measles in 1964, one year post vaccine introduction had 458,083 reported cases of infection, and 421 deaths….still the same ratio of death to infection, .0009. Subsequent years actually found the ratio climbing, showing an increasing lethality. Since 2013, there are no deaths listed in this register. However the VAERs reports reflect both deaths and disabilities since that time due to vaccination, a clear and obvious warning sign that is being intentionally ignored. What I found most troubling when I ran the VAERs query myself to look at all the adverse affects that were reported, is the fact that a full 70% of ALL ADVERSE AFFECTS happen within the first 24 hours after vaccination. 50% of the reports occurred within zero days of the vaccination…..and 20% occurred within twenty four hours. The window is too short to dismiss as “correlation does not equal causation”, a bullshit talking point that is parroted over and over by industry schills. Not a coincidence. Not even close.

Comments are closed.