by Jon Rappoport
November 28, 2017
(To join our email list, click here.)
(For Part-2, click here.)
Here I am printing the abstract of a new study: “Aluminium in brain tissue in autism.” The publication is Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology.
The authors of the study are associated with The Birchall Centre, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK; Life Sciences, Keele University; and the Department of Clinical Neuropathology, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.
From what I can see, the full text of the study has not been published yet. I’m interested to know exactly how the study authors obtained brain tissue samples from patients.
The findings? Shockingly high levels of aluminum were found in these brain samples. It’s widely acknowledged that aluminum can enter the brain and disrupt its functions.
Of course, aluminum is present in many vaccines.
Here is the abstract of the study. I’ve put several statements in caps for emphasis:
“Autism spectrum disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder of unknown aetiology. It is suggested to involve both genetic susceptibility and environmental factors including in the latter environmental toxins. Human exposure to the environmental toxin aluminium has been linked, if tentatively, to autism spectrum disorder. Herein we have used transversely heated graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry to measure, for the first time, the aluminium content of brain tissue from donors with a diagnosis of autism. We have also used an aluminium-selective fluor to identify aluminium in brain tissue using fluorescence microscopy. THE ALUMINIUM CONTENT OF BRAIN TISSUE IN AUTISM WAS CONSISTENTLY HIGH. The mean (standard deviation) aluminium content across all 5 individuals for each lobe were 3.82(5.42), 2.30(2.00), 2.79(4.05) and 3.82(5.17) μg/g dry wt. for the occipital, frontal, temporal and parietal lobes respectively. THESE ARE SOME OF THE HIGHEST VALUES FOR ALUMINIUM IN HUMAN BRAIN TISSUE YET RECORDED AND ONE HAS TO QUESTION WHY, FOR EXAMPLE, THE ALUMINIUM CONTENT OF THE OCCIPITAL LOBE OF A 15 YEAR OLD BOY WOULD BE 8.74 (11.59) μg/g dry wt.? Aluminium-selective fluorescence microscopy was used to identify aluminium in brain tissue in 10 donors [10 donors or 5, as mentioned above?]. While aluminium was imaged associated with neurones it appeared to be present intracellularly in microglia-like cells and other inflammatory non-neuronal cells in the meninges, vasculature, grey and white matter. The pre-eminence of intracellular aluminium associated with non-neuronal cells was a standout observation in autism brain tissue and may offer clues as to both the origin of the brain aluminium as well as a putative role in autism spectrum disorder.”
The study authors mention “clues.” What about the many aluminum-containing childhood vaccines now on official schedules?
Worldmercuryproject.org writes:
“What does this mean for today’s generation of children who receive 5,000 mcg of aluminum in vaccines by the age of 18 months and up to 5,250 additional mcg if all recommended boosters, HPV and meningitis vaccines are administered.”
This might well constitute a “clue,” pointing to where at least some of that highly toxic aluminum in autistic brains comes from.
As “the experts” deny this vaccine-aluminum-autism connection, I would suggest they back up their “science” by stepping forward themselves and taking ALL the vaccines on the official schedule, including boosters, in order to catch up with their shots. They should do this in the limited time recommended by public health agencies.
After all, if aluminum (and other toxic substances) in vaccines aren’t a problem, what do they have to lose?
They’re desperate to mandate the full load of vaccines for every man, woman, and child—so they should start with themselves.
Otherwise, they have no standing to make claims.
Neither do “science bloggers” who embrace every official mainstream study as if it were manna from heaven. To them, I offer the following quotes from two famous medical-journal editors, who have pored over more studies than these bloggers have dreamed of.
Marcia Angell, former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, in the NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption”:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”
Here is Richard Horton (another pro’s pro), editor-in-chief, The Lancet, in The Lancet, 11 April, 2015, Vol 385, “Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma?”:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness…
“The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of ‘significance’ pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale…Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent…”
I want to see more on the new study showing shocking levels of aluminum in autistic people. I want to see funding provided to other researchers—INDEPENDENT RESEARCHERS with no ties to drug companies or government agencies—so they can follow up on the new study and come to their own conclusions.
And I want to see common sense applied to aluminum toxicity.
As in: why would anyone want to inject children with a known neurotoxin?
Would you be willing to spin the roulette wheel on YOUR child’s life and future and brain?
Well, would you?
(Flashback: “Vaccines-aluminum-autism: but don’t worry, go back to sleep”.)
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
When somebody makes a study on any component that’s in a vaccine, he is automatically being labeled as anti-vaxxer. There is a big dogma upon vaccines, nobody can question their safety. And one day when vaccines are abolished as medieval practice, will the pharma industry be held responsible for destroying millions of lives? So far they got away with everything.
Trick question: how many diseases have been eradicated by vaccines?
Easy: zero. Vaccines cannot and do not protect from anything. It is the terrain that matters, not the germ, and vaccines only damage your inner terrain.
A good though lengthy multi-part introduction to the problems of vaccination for those who are new to the topic: http://www.visionlaunch.com/many-people-choosing-not-vaccinate/
Pat Jordan talks about how the aluminum in vaccines completely bypasses the blood brain barrier and causes autism. His ICD-999 is a must read. You should get on his email list and collaborate on the research effort with him, send him as much information as you can find and he will do a meta-analysis of it and tell you what it all means. http://www.vaccinefraud.com/email-list.html
aluminum is present in geoengineering(chemtrails) as well. barium,strontium and other junk as well are added to the mix in nano form. we breathe this stuff every day.
And then there is the case for Aluminum resistant crops, that thrive in aluminum toxic soil and uptake the metal an it become part of the food chain.
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/410926/toxicity-resistant-crops/
Aluminum is being sprayed from the sky as well as covert solar radiation management (SRM) – Geoengineeringwarch.org
It’s Autism when they’re young….and Alzheimers and dementia when they’re old. Bottom line is, aluminum causes brain damage at any age. The elderly are the favorite victims of flu and pneuma vax campaigns,and it’s become the norm to expect an eventual nursing home placement for the majority of people over 70 thanks to all the cognitive problems that people now think are the inevitable result of aging. They aren’t…nor should these things be normalized! There is an enormous body of research out there about the health disasters caused by aluminum toxicity; much of it coming out of neuroscience and chemistry fields and commercial search engines don’t bring them up when you’re looking……but this research IS out there for anyone willing to spend a little bit of time.
Jon;
The full text is here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763
– David
>
Super-high levels of toxic aluminum found in the brains of autistic patients: aluminum is present in many vaccines | The Crazz Files
http://crazzfiles.com/super-high-levels-of-toxic-aluminum-found-in-the-brains-of-autistic-patients-aluminum-is-present-in-many-vaccines/
Some links I found
https://content.iospress.com/download/journal-of-alzheimers-disease-reports/adr170010?id=journal-of-alzheimers-disease-reports%2Fadr170010
https://www.hippocraticpost.com/nursing/why-everyone-should-drink-silicon-rich-mineral-water/
cheers
Richard
Australia
Glyphosate (+additives) is known to open-up the gut / brain barriers. The glyphosate cocktail has a synergistic transfer relationship with injected, inhaled or injected aluminum. At what point does it become fashionable to state the obvious?
I guess that they are preparing the next generation to be able to merge with the aluminum robots.
Infant milk formula has up to 500 microgram of aluminium per litre. In a typical day of feeding on milk formula a baby takes in more aluminium this way than from vaccines given once.
Interestingly aluminium in formula is up to 20 times that of human breast milk.
I think this should also be a focus of your concern. In a typical infants first year of life they will receive hundreds of times more aluminium from food than vaccines and probably more on a daily basis…..
Yeah, that’s not good, but vaccines bypass all the natural filters of the body. It goes straight in without any means of elimination.
Ingestion and injection are two different things.
REVEALED: Toxic Mechanism of Vaccine Aluminum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=UCr8TiyUPB0
DOCTORS TRULY ARE THE SICKEST , MENTALLY ILL
KILLING MY FAMILY ,
TOTALLY INCOMPETENT TO PRACTICE MEDICAL ,
TRILLION DOLLAR EMPIRE . OF FRAUD
CENSORED FROM MAINSTREAM MEDIA ,
MODERN DAY CANNIBALISM .
MURDER HEALTH CARE SYSTEM .
WELCOME TO AMERICA , THE WORLD MELTING POT.
MORE LIKE THE HUMAN MEAT GRINDER .
MURDER HEALTH CARE .
There is NOTHING, not one ingredient, in a vaccine, that promotes or protects health, or builds immunity. Vaccines contain many ingredients which cause a very large spectrum of damages, up to, and including, sudden death.
Why not take the precautionary principles of drinking a silicon rich mineral water to flush out the aluminium toxin. We cannot avoid aluminium in our daily living but we can prevent it from getting into our body. The silicon rich mineral water used in research to remove aluminium comes from Spritzer and is known as ACILIS in UK. Check out these links http://www.silicawaters.com and http://www.siliconrich.com . Check out these sites http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/scientists-discover-non-invasive-treatment-multiple-sclerosis
https://www.hippocraticpost.com/innovation/role-aluminium-multiple-sclerosis/
https://www.keele.ac.uk/pressreleases/2012/asilicon-richmineralwatertherapyforalzheimersdisease.php
I’m sure glad I was vaccinated. NO aluminum problems…NO Autism…and NO Polio…NO Whooping Cough…NO Mumps…NO Measles…etc.
Really, parading your ignorance of this subject only serves to spotlight your woeful lack of research, knowledge, or understanding, of any aspect of it.
Im Ashly […] 59 years of age, i was diagnosed of COPD and Hepatitis b in 2013, my doctor told me that there was no possible way i can get a cure to COPD and Hepatitis b, so i started taking antiviral medications lamivudine (EPIVIR), there was a day i decided to do some research online i saw some comment on how Standard Herbs Home have helped people with herbal remedy to cure a lot of deadly disease, i contacted Standard Herbs Home and they sent me herbal medicine which i used for 4 weeks then i went for check-up and i was COPD and Hepatitis b free totally .thank you Standard Herbs Home God bless you.
Interesting finding but the study is preliminary. They did not mention aluminum levels in control or non autistic children.If all children are receiving vaccines then presumably normal children would have high brain levels of aluminum unless autistic children have an impaired ability to excrete the metal. BTW Antiperspirants are another source of aluminum exposures.
Reblogged this on amnesiaclinic and commented:
Take care, Jon, a lot at stake and they will get nasty. Cornered rats and all that….
In Plotkins deposition they go over the Gardasil vaccine insert. In it is a study of individuals who were given 1 of 3 injections, saline placebo, aluminum adjuvant, gardasil vaccine. In it the amount of systematic autoimmune disorders resulting from the injections were both 2.3 %. I say both because it only lists two columns. It adds both aluminum adjuvant and saline placebo results and bases its percentage on those combined. When they looked futher into the study they found 0% was the amount in the saline group. When you subtract the amount of people in the saline group, the percent of autoimmune disorders goes up in the aluminum adjuvant group. So 4.5 % is the new number for the aluminum group. Shouldn’t that warrant a study into aluminum? How can they deem that safe?