by Jon Rappoport
November 5, 2017
(To join our email list, click here.)
A news story tend to move in waves. It appears, retreats, and then appears in an altered form—replete with lies, cover stories, and embedded confusion. That’s why I’m keeping this story alive in its stark essence—
The reference is the New York Times, 3/9/15, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” It describes the frontier of research. Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:
“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”
“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”
“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.” [That was nearly two years ago.]
“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”
Here is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”
Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.”
Alteration of the human genetic makeup.
Not just a “visit.” Permanent residence. And once a person’s DNA is changed, doesn’t it follow that he/she will pass on that change to the next generation of children, and so on, down the line?
The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:
“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”
Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.
This is genetic roulette with a loaded gun.
And the further implications are clear. Vaccines can be used as a cover for the injections of any and all genes, whose actual purpose is re-engineering humans.
The emergence of this Frankenstein technology is paralleled by a shrill push to mandate vaccines, across the board, for both children and adults. The pressure and propaganda are planet-wide.
If you’re going to alter humans, for example, to make many of them more docile and weak, and some of them stronger, in order to restructure society, you want everyone under the umbrella. No exceptions. No exemptions.
The freedom and the right to refuse vaccines has always been vital. It is more vital than ever now.
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
“Yes, some people might be leery”
Call me Timothy
Farzan and assoc’s. ought to be required to study the gene manipulation problems the Annunaki dealt with. Not a trivial thing and largely prone to nasty failures.
This is the same genetic re-engineering model used to “improve” our seeds and food supply and to produce ‘newer and better’ synthetic pharmaceuticals. Sounds like humans need to be re-engineered in order to offset all the damage that genetically modified foods, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals that humans are exposed to on a daily basis. The never ending consumer cycle.
“Protection Without a Vaccine.” … “By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”
This is so bizarre; as if we don’t already have systems inherited (and developed in each of us as we live) that protect us from disease. We already resist disease.
With the caveat that people are not suppressing their own immune systems…. Which seems to be an additional top down goal…it’s good for the pharmaceutical industry and the ‘health care’ system.
¢ha-¢HING!!!
I couldn’t agree more. If we lose the right to decide what is injected into our body and those of our children, we are no longer free citizens. Mandating vaccines is an irreversible step toward tyranny.
It makes me wonder if the recent publication by the Scripps Research Institute of a study they did detailing the failures of the flu vaccine which concludes that the failure rests in the way the vaccine is made. That leads smoothly into this vaccine alternative. They only admit the flaw once they have the “Solution” ready to push on a gullible public.
In “The Time Machine”, H.G. Wells may be on to something. The Eloi lived above ground and the Morlocks below ground. The Eloi were weak and afraid of the dark. The Morlocks lived underground. They came above ground at night to prey on the Eloi.
This has actually been going on for quite some time. Dr. Harold Buttram (“Vaccinations and Immune Malfunction”) was talking about this 30 years ago, although whether it was intentional or unintentional at the time is debatable.
VACCINES AND GENETIC MUTATION–Harold E. Buttram, MD …
whale.to/a/yurko.html
VACCINES AND GENETIC MUTATION Harold E. Buttram, MD; … Howard B Urnovitz, PhD, and Dr. MG … that this evidence constitutes proof of genetic change from vaccines.
And, of course, vivisection brought us this whole mess in the first place. So, what does almost everyone on both sides of the issue call for? MORE vivisection! And it keeps biting us on our self-absorbed asses.
“The spiritual malady that rages in the soul of the vivisector is in itself sufficient to render him incapable of acquiring the highest and best knowledge. He finds it easier to propagate and multiply disease than to discover the secret of health. Seeking for the germs of life, he invents only new methods of death.” – Dr. Anna Kingsford
You are moving into “extra-terrestrial” (sic) Draco territory (you will find many articles on the subject https://exopolitician.wordpress.com) here, Jon.
My response is, how could ignorant apes barely capable of pruning gardens effectively believe they can “mess” with DNA?
Our “scientists” don’t understand how genes work as they took in the wrong places in the wrong way. Sure, they can induce synthetic, standardised symptoms “for a while”. Then DNA will readjust and everyone will scratch their heads…..again. Yawn.
Good press piece, but nonsense.
Best
OT
This is hardly nonsense. The massive damage done to children by vaccines causing encephalitis leading to autism and vaccines leading to Guillian-Barre (flaccid paralysis) and the damage from vaccines leading to infertility and um, death–are not being miraculously cured by naturally adjusting DNA now are they? Massive damage has already been done through vaccination and is everywhere in evidence. One in 7 children has now got some form of neurological damage. One in 58 Kindergartners are autistic. The SV-40 Monkey virus attached effectively to human DNA through the polio vaccine given in the 60’s and vertically transferred down the generations causing many thousands of childhood and adult lymphomas and brain cancers. If you can call all of that “nonsense” I can see why you are still scratching your head.
Think about this, the .gov owns your labor through contract, as in the legal fiction. Now whey will own YOU through the patent on their NEW product. The modified YOU. Just as they do with the crops.You will be a (GMO)
A news story tend*s* to move in waves. Hard to get past a bad opening sentence for some of us… gheesh!
Well, a typo might be a hard thing to deal with, for those who are obsessive-compulsive. But in reality, a typo is a very small issue to get uppity about when so many people in this day and age don’t have basic spelling and/or grammar skills.
I’ve been jumped on for reminding others about the proper use of “there,” “their,” and “they’re,” among so many other blatant violations of proper English, which I’m seeing regularly. And if I only had a nickel for every time I’ve heard “Where he (she, or it) is AT” … I’d be a wealthy woman.