Deep medical fraud: logical insight cancels brain fog
by Jon Rappoport
June 28, 2017
In the course of an investigation, a clue can turn up that changes everything. It exposes massive falsehoods and fraud.
But the meaning of the clue doesn’t always tap the investigator on the shoulder and reveal its full implications. The force of the rational insight is on a delay mechanism, as it were.
When I was writing my first book, AIDS INC., in the late 1980s, I was surrounded by much confusion. A bewildering number of facts and opinions and lies were being fed to me by various sources. I was taping notes to my walls and trying to sort out the mess of spaghetti.
One day, while I was researching the AIDS antibody test, I spoke to an official at the FDA. He mentioned that, if a vaccine were developed for HIV, anyone who received it would be given a special letter from the government. The letter would declare that if this person ever tested positive for HIV, the result should be ignored, because the antibodies that made the test turn positive were resulting from the protective vaccine, not lethal HIV in the body.
After I hung up the phone, I tried to think through what I had just heard. Something strange was going on. What was it?
About a week later, it hit me. The brain fog was gone.
The official government position implied: if an HIV vaccine were ever developed, it would stimulate antibodies to HIV in the body and thus confer protection against AIDS. But…
If an unvaccinated person, taking an HIV test, registered positive, that result would signal the presence of antibodies to HIV in the body—and THAT would mean the person had AIDS or was on the road to developing it.
However, in either case, THE ANTIBODIES WERE THE SAME.
If they were stimulated and acquired through a vaccine, that was a good sign. It meant immunity.
But if these same antibodies were acquired naturally, as a response to making contact with HIV, that was a bad sign. It meant AIDS, now, or just up the road.
Vaccine antibodies GOOD.
Natural antibodies BAD.
THE SAME ANTIBODIES.
Unintentionally implicit in the FDA spokesman’s statements was the logical walkway called reductio ad absurdum; a reduction to absurdity. In other words, if you took the FDA man’s claim about the letter a person vaccinated against HIV would carry with him—and if you thought it through and saw all the implications, you would see the whole proposal was absurd to the highest degree.
A vaccine would produce an effect, X, which would confer immunity. The body, producing the same effect, X, would signal impending disease and even death.
Medical solution GOOD.
Body’s natural solution BAD.
Time and time again in my investigations, I’ve found reductio ad absurdum to be a very good friend and ally. Aristotle originally formulated the strategy, and it has stood the time of time quite nicely.
The overall pattern is rather simple: take an assertion; understand what it claims; lay out the chain of implications that follow from the assertion; show that this chain leads to an impossible or absurd consequence. THEREFORE, reject the assertion.
It’s like following a faulty set of directions. You drive through various streets and shift from one highway to another, all in the process of finding your way home from a distant location. But the directions finally lead you to a series of barriers at the desolate end of a highway, beyond which there is no road, only a pile of construction materials and a dank dark river you’ve never seen before.
It’s not home. It’s not useful. It makes no sense. It’s reductio ad absurdum.
The idea that a HIV vaccine would confer immunity, while a person’s own body—producing the same antibodies—wouldn’t confer immunity, is preposterous.
In the years since AIDS INC. was published, I’ve written about the sea-change that has occurred in disease diagnosis and vaccine “protection.” These days, a person receiving an antibody test for ANY given disease is told he is “positive” for the disease if antibodies show up on the test. But if he receives a vaccine that produces the same antibodies, he’s told he’s immune.
It makes zero sense.
Here is a final clue. A positive antibody test is no reason to tell a person he is sick or is going to get sick. A positive test most often indicates the person’s immune system has swung into gear and neutralized the germ in question. BUT if the medical establishment decides, arbitrarily, to interpret every positive test as a sign of illness, then many, many more people can be diagnosed with diseases. And then…
They can be treated with drugs.
And then, pharmaceutical cash registers ring like crazy with profits.
(To read about Jon’s collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
Ever notice the published list of symptoms of “end of life” are the same published side effects of Ativan, the drug hospice gives patients to reduce end of life symptoms?
When you get swollen lymph nodes is it a sign of disease or does it mean your body is actually doing what it is supposed to do?
If a fever activates our bodies to reduce inflammation, why do we down fever reducing medications like candy?
If our immune system is controlled by gut bacteria, when we have an infection why do we take antibiotics that kill that bacteria?
you ask too many questions, missy.
This brings up a thought for me as we all discuss/disgust the corrupt Medical cartel. The Meds, close allies of the Feds, say that many ailments are normal and OK for an old person. Old age and dying are OK for an old person. But the truth of the matter is, and is concealed by the “Meds,” is that there is enough supplements and other techniques, often involving electronics, electrical fields, magnetic field and various frequencies that we do not have to age as fast and severe as had been the case prior to our times.
But the Meds do not want us to know that or do that. They want us to hurry up and die and leave as much money to them in bills as possible. Old does not have to be so fast and young. we could preserve out health better, retain more of our youthful signs longer and expand our life spans modestly.
But the Meds tell me (you believe me, don’t you?) They don’t want this getting out. They would not make anywhere near as much money if everyone used supplements and electrical devices and they would live longer and that creates a danger that they might live long enough to wake up in more numbers and their brain might work better. And they said that if I liked living, that I might want to shut my mouth.
But as usual, I’m not very good at listening. My teachers said that, too. Hey! What do you know. they do know something, but not much. Old people are supposed to be ill and in pain. And God help anyone who tells the Meds they are liars and murderers. Remember, they are friends with the Feds and their armies.
You would be correct , watch Dr Stefan Lanka on you tube simply brilliant , we really do live in a sea of lies .
The medical cartel are the classic lying Marxists. And they are protected and made to prosper by the sheltering, law-making, and “mob” enforcement of the government Godfathers. No one is allowed to question the medical hit men or refuse the treatment of the medical cartel. They are, essentially, God incarnate and don’t you doubt it or else!
Marxists have no use for solid logic and reason. Instead, they cater to wishful thinking of the useful idiots, and give them a a little encouragement and recognition for a brief time, till the leaders get in power. Then they kill off the useful idiots. Marxists always point out flaws and sins of others but never their own or of past Marxist regimes. A marxist will do anything they have to, to win and take power. Then the killing begins as it has long been for the medical cartel, who charge people huge amounts of money in exchange for a slow painful death. Why do people put up with this? I have no answer.
Marxism and the Medical cartel never have good reasons for their actions. Their fruits are always death destruction. But they always have the support of the state military and brutal despotic generals, who are nothing but brutal mob enforcement. Well, there ya have it!
This is the same as the recent push for healthy baby boomers to get test for Hep C and then if positive receive treatment that cost in excessive of 160K. Most probable scenario is their own body already mounted an immune response and controlled the disease.
This is the exact thing that came to mind for me too!
Check out the following paper, JOS_Volume-9_Number-2_Nov_2014-Swanson-et-al
In Figure 22 graph shows a correlation between increases of diagnoses of hepatitis C and increases of GE soy crop growth, R=0.9456, which is very high.
Hepatitis C correlates with GE crops because the viral diseases may be activated by the viral promoter CaMV 35-S, cauliflower mosaic virus, used to promote the uptake of the inserted genes in the plant’s DNA. The CaMV 35-S viral promoter is chemically similar to the Hepatitis C virus.
Remember, correlation is not causation, but no one will work to establish a causation as it will cause loss of profits for GE seed makers.
thank you for the info.
Antibody titers and immunity: Are they related – Pro-Liberty
http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20080110.htm
I have one to offer on the greenhouse effect and global warming. The propaganda has us focused on the sunny side of earth. One day it occurred to me that the dark side of earth is exposed to the cold of outer space. Whatever heat is gained on the sunny side is lost on the dark side.
This would only be true if we had no (or nearly no) atmosphere. On planets or moons without one, the temperature swings from day to night are very extreme (if they are close enough to the sun, or another star, to be appreciably heated during their day). The greenhouse effect of our atmosphere keeps Earth at a relatively stable temperature. Water vapor enhances this effect. In tropical areas, where there is a lot of water vapor in the air, there is very little variation in temperature between day and night, because water vapor is the most effective greenhouse gas; in deserts, the variation in temp between day and night is much greater because there is so little water in the air.
The propaganda really doesn’t focus on the sunny side of Earth (or the effect of the sun and its variations in energy output at all). Instead it focuses on carbon (mostly CO2), despite the small role it plays in modulating the greenhouse effect, and despite the fact that its content in the atmosphere has been several times higher in the geologic past when there was abundant life on Earth, and that it enhances plant growth.
Ray, have you noticed how lightning is drawn to the ground and Electrical wiring is grounded, too. Electricity is naturally drawn to the center of the earth. That deep center of earth heats up and creates the internal circulation system otherwise called plate tectonics. This is what interacts with the sun and weather. As well, as the solar system rotates around the center of the Milkyway Galaxy, it and our earth encounter charged plasma. The plasma that drifts in space, depending on the amount of charge in the collective plasma, the sun can burn hotter or cooler. this explains why Carbon 14 measurements very in time. Variance in climate is natural and normal.
But those who rule the world want any excuse to raise (and justify the raise) the taxes and increase our huge burden. They are liars through and through!
If you want to know the cause of any specific case of an illness for certain – cure it. The cure is a proof that defines the cause.
Prevention, on the other hand, can make no such claim. Preventative actions, like vaccinations, are speculations that cannot cure. It is, for all practical purposes, impossible to prove that a vaccine prevented a specific illness. There may have been many other factors.
But a cure is a cure. If an illness is cured, the cause has been addressed. We might argue about which cause has been addressed, but we have to admit that when a cure is present, the cause has been addressed.
So… How can the medical establishment avoid this reality? It’ simple. Do not define ‘cured’. If cured is not defined, no illness can be cured. If cured is not defined, no cures can be found.
What is a cure for AIDS? Cured for AIDS is not defined. If AIDS is cured, it is not possible to prove a cure.
Now pay attention to two important facts:
First: Cure is not defined for any illness that is not caused by a parasite. Not defined. Therefore, in current medical theory, it is not possible to cure any illness that is not caused by a parasite. Ridiculous? We know how to cure scurvy! Or do we? Merck, Lange’s, and Harrison’s each recommend ‘treatments’ for scurvy, but do not use the word cure, and in fact – all three fail to recommend a treatment that cures.
Second: Cure is not defined, at all, in many medical dictionaries and reference texts. Webster’s New World Medical Dictionary, Third Edition does not contain the words cure, cured, nor incurable.
Cure does not appear in The Oxford Concise Medical Dictionary, Ninth Edition, 2015. nor in The Bantam Medical Dictionary, Sixth Edition, 2009. “Cure” does not appear in Barron’s Dictionary of Medical Terms, Sixth Edition, 2013, nor in Medical Terminology for Dummies, Second Edition. How many more? I know of several, but I suspect there are too many to list.
Cure is not defined in Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, nor in Lange’s Medical diagnosis and treatment. It is defined in Merck’s Manual of Diagnosis and Treatment – but only in the section for ‘alternative medicines’.
When you strike the word cure from medicine, all things become incurable – and that’s the current state of medicine. When all things are incurable, there are only two medicines. Those that address symptoms, but don’t cure, and those that claim to prevent illness – vaccinations.
to your health, tracy
I know several people who I believe are suffering with parasite infections, their doctors never recommend parasite treatment. Two of these people have been taking meds for 50 yrs for symptoms.
And yet they just keep on “running for the cure”. Quite the slight of hand.
You speak 100% truth, healthicine. The medical devils are completely dishonest in their trickery and deceit. Because they do not define cure, they can ignore or dispute anything. If I don’t define up or down, the you can’t say where you are in the atmosphere. I am surprised anyone takes medical profession seriously. They all ought to be burned at the stake as being witches or liars or both. I am sure they are fans of the devil and bow to him regularly.
Thank you for this analysis, including the book references. Very interesting.
If you want to read an amazing book, Try Daniel Hayley’s “Politics in Healing. You’ll never be the same. It tends to be expensive used like $30 and $40. But right now, it available for $8. Do not delay buying this book of amazing cures, most of which are all banned not but not entirely. You’ll never be the same. Not sure how long this book remain affordable. It was outrageous for years.
Snooze, you lose!
[…] I’ve only recently noticed/realized that every, single person who acts like I’m intelligently inferior to them for not having vaccinated any of my kids (21+ years and all are still going strong), have NEVER heard of vaccination exemptions? But yet, they, “know it all.” More like, they know what they are told, taught and trained to know, nothing more.
Does vaccinating make sense?
Dr Stefan Lanka and Dr. Karl Krafeld
This is the translation of the flyer by the society of which Dr Stefan Lanka and Karl Krafeld are presidents of. They are actually encouraging people to write to the government to be shown actual proof that viruses exist, since so much scientific ‘evidence’ is based on it. Although this has been done since the middle of last year, in Germany as well as Austria, and apparently some other European countries, so far, no government body has been able to provide this proof or to even refer to any relevant scientific literature! I will start something like this here in the UK, and I’d love to see this started in every country.
claudia
WISSENSCHAFT, MEDIZIN UND MENSCHENRECHTE E.V.Does vaccinating make sense?
No! Because vaccinating is comprehensive fraud. It has NEVER been possible to create diseases with relevant microbes. In the year 1882, the bacteriologist Robert Koch started scientific fraud on political orders. As neither he himself nor others managed to cause the purported diseases with bacteria, he produced, in totally INSANE and cruel animal experiments, “similar symptoms“ and assessed this as proof for the ability to infect someone. All those who vaccinate refer to these experiments from the 19th Century.
Yes! If one accepts and approves that the governments of the world irreversibly implant nerve poisons such as mercury, aluminum, solvents etc by bypassing detoxification with vaccination. These nerve poisons provoke gradual to manifest stupidification, development disturbances of all kinds, paralysis and death of the vaccinated and serve to break the will of human beings. If the reactions to vaccines go beyond the average, then the law speaks of „vaccine damage“.
No! Because ‚the ability to infect’ was exclusively defined as poisoning by scientific medicine (Virchow, Max von Pettenkofer, Rush, Klein and others) which has recognized diseases objectively correct between poisoning, deficiency and brain functions. And the latin name for poison, for example in water through faeces, decay poisons in food and from corpses is Virus.Experiments were carried out publicly which have disproven the statements about „infection“ through microbes and vaccination.
Yes! If one accepts and approves that „vaccinating“ has turned the human being into an easily manipulatable object who now believes that health does not result from onself, but requires a strong state and its pharma industry. Because the one who allows to be vaccinated, will allow anything and will no longer notice that he/she is being poisoned and killed with antibiotics, chemotherapy, irradiation, gen technology etc.
No! Because none of those „viruses“ that claim to make you ill, like smallpox, polio, hepatitis, aids, ebola, measles, mumps, rubella and tic viruses has ever been seen, isolated and proven as existent. State medicine invented these „viruses“ in order to conceal vaccination and medication damages. This fact can easily be checked by anyone. There is no publication in scientific literature in which a scientist states and proves that he isolated and characterized the relevant virus out of a sick person. Relevant text books present, with fraudulent intention, models and photographs of cells as ‚viruses’. Any amateur can learn, within a couple of days, the isolating, photographing and characterizing of viruses which exist – and which are all harmless.
Yes! If one accepts and approves that by way of „vaccinating“ in the Third World, massive „population control“, speak euthanasia, was and is executed. The vaccines there contain pregnancy hormones to prevent conception, gentech activated nuclein acid to sterilize males as well, plutomium with which whole tribes have been poisoned, etc. If the same nerve poisons are contained in these vaccines as in this country, then in a much higher concentration, up to 100 and 1000-fold. The resulting „vaccine damages“, acute liver failure and resulting whole boody bleeding will then be termed „ebola“, „marburg“, „crimea-congo“, „lassa“ infection etc or as „Aids“.
No! Because even since Pasteur, no vaccine contains what it claims to contain: viruses or parts thereof! If one enquires at the responsible authorities, the answer is given that this is a company secret of the manufacturer which has to be protected by the state. The health authorities, medical association and physicians conceal that each vaccine contains poisons, such as mercury, aluminum, solvents etc. Without which the „serum“ would never produce a reaction! Inserts are generally not distributed.
Yes! If one accepts and approves that the CDC and EIS and therefore the Pentagon manipulate the national health authorities through the WHO, and created through parliaments the legal frame to suspend civil rights any time and anywhere.A nd who execute a psychoterror, which is proven to result in ill health, against their own people by making dishonest statements about biowarfare, e.g. anthrax, pox, polio etc.
No! Because all numbers shown by the state show clearly that „vaccinations“ never had any influence on falling numbers of diseases, quite to the contrary. This is an easily uncovered fraud of those in favor of vaccinations in the production of statistics. The same goes for the definition of the various „infectious“ diseases. These are constantly changed in order to proof, on one hand, the success of „vaccinations“, such as the change of the definition of „smallpox“ and „polio“ to show their disappearance and on the other hand to invent new „infectious diseases“, such as AIDS.
Yes! If one accepts that genocide happens in your own country, because the German penal code defines „vaccination“ as genocide: „Who, with the intention to wholly or partly destroy a national, racial, religious or ethnic group as such, impose living conditions which are suitable to effect their physical destruction wholle or partly will be punished with life long imprisonment. In lesser cases, the punishment is no less than five years.“ Appeal!
Those who continue to recommend, execute or allow vaccination, following these statements of facts. The advice is that the facts stated in this flyer will be checked by the reader. The simplest way to do this is to ask the relevant authorities for a scientific publication in which a scientist states and proves that he has isolated and shown the relevant illness causing „virus“ taken from an ill person. This is called the compliance with the First Koch Postulate, which medicine states contrary to better knowledge.
The law here demands proof according to the current state of science and technology. Therefore, proving the existence of a „virus“ that causes disease requires the thermionic microscopic photograph of the isolated virus and the biochemical characterizing of the virus components. As such a proof does not exist anywhere, it becomes clear that the nerve poisons in the vaccines are intentionally implanted in the population. With this wanted deception and poisoning of the population, every citizen is obliged to file charges with the police against executioners and those involved in vaccinations. Read the book virus mania . Watch the documentary VAXXED , HOUSE OF NUMBERS endless lies . We need a Nuremberg trial these are CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY .
Reblogged this on Fed Up Democrat and commented:
There are very few reports I would post sourced to an unnamed former vaccine insider, but Jon Rappaport has proven himself to be a trustworthy source for decades. This is a frightening interview that must be read and considered.