The TPP and GMOs: what’s so bad about death?
by Jon Rappoport
November 8, 2015
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
The text of the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) has now been published.
[https:// ustr (dot) gov /trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/trans-pacific-partnership/tpp-full-text]
This Globalist treaty will put mega-corporations even further ahead in their efforts to dominate markets and populations.
“The parts of the TPP that cover food safety are especially troubling,” states the watchdog Food and Water Watch:
“’American consumers are pushing to block the use of artificial and potentially risky processes and ingredients, like antibiotics and GMOs, but the TPP could trump these democratic efforts to improve our food supply,’ said [Wenonah] Hauter [Food and Water Watch executive director]… Agribusiness and biotech seed companies can now more easily use trade rules to challenge countries that ban GMO imports, test for GMO contamination, do not promptly approve new GMO crops or even require GMO labeling.”
The majority of Monsanto’s GMO crops are engineered to withstand huge amounts of the pesticide Roundup, and the main ingredient in Roundup is glyphosate, which the World Health Organization now lists as a “probable carcinogen.” As in: cancer.
That’s a recent finding.
But what did Monsanto know decades ago?
From GM Watch, November 6; “Monsanto’s secret studies reveal glyphosate link to cancer”:
“Monsanto has known for almost four decades that glyphosate causes cancer, according to a new paper by researchers Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff.
“Samsel is the first independent researcher to examine Monsanto’s secret toxicology studies on glyphosate. He obtained the studies, which have been denied to other inquirers, via a request to his senator. With his co-researcher Dr Stephanie Seneff of MIT, he reviewed Monsanto’s data.
“Samsel and Seneff concluded that ‘significant evidence of tumours was found during these investigations’.
“However, they add, ‘to create doubt and obscure the statistical significance of inconvenient findings, which may have prevented product registration’, Monsanto introduced irrelevant historical control data from other experiments. This is data from the control animals in other unrelated experiments, which may have been carried out under widely differing conditions.
“This practice had the effect of creating experimental noise which cancelled out the statistically significant findings of increased tumours in any one experiment.
“In various cancer experiments, Samsel and Seneff found, Monsanto introduced spurious data from 3, 5, 7 and even 11 unrelated study controls to effectively eliminate results, as needed.”
Getting the picture?
The new TPP greatly benefits corporations like Monsanto, and can enable the growing and shipping of all sorts of GMO crops (laden with titanic quantities of Roundup), without labeling, without inspection, and without the power of national governments to stop this ongoing crime—even though Monsanto knew, long ago, that Roundup causes tumors.
Where is the US Justice Department? Nowhere. Where is Obama, who is desperately pushing for passage of the TPP? Nowhere.
Maybe, although we don’t know it, “the science is settled.” Roundup is actually good for you. It raises IQ, extends physical endurance, elevates mood, assures safe pregnancies, promotes freedom, ensures equality and justice for all, secretly puts money in your bank account while you’re sleeping, and makes everybody love one another right now.
Operators are standing by. Call 800-THE FIX IS IN and support Monsanto for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
Jeff Sessions: TPP ‘Breathtaking… Erosion of Sovereignty’
“They’re not even asserting that it will create jobs in America…”
http://www.infowars.com/jeff-sessions-tpp-breathtaking-erosion-of-sovereignty/
the ‘background documents’ behind/leading up to the ‘TPP treaty’ will remain secret for 6 years.
see video at 00m54s
http://www.infowars.com/details-of-sweeping-tpp-trade-deal-revealed/
The bloated dinosaur in the room that no one cares to address:
http://real-agenda.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/KILLING-US-SOFTLY2.pdf
thank you.
lots of very useful well-presented information
to share with those who neglect to be aware
of how many ways we are under assault.
i finally had to bypass the author’s own thoughts
throughout the pdf. this is one very sick human.
if he had any honor at all he would volunteer
himself for depopulation.
the welfare of humanity is always the
alibii of tyrants – albert camus
We have to stop this insanity.
Leslie
Isn’t RoundUp an herbicide? You called it a pesticide, “The majority of Monsanto’s GMO crops are engineered to withstand huge amounts of the pesticide Roundup, and the main ingredient in Roundup is glyphosate, which the World Health Organization now lists as a “probable carcinogen.”
Pesticides are a broad definition that include herbicides. Herbicides are a sub-group of pesticides. So it’s okay to use the term pesticide for an herbicide; since – according to the definition by the EPA – weeds are considered “plant pests” and pests are eliminated by pesticides, and since herbicides kill plant pests, i.e. weeds, then you have a valid use of the word.
“probable carcinogen.”
….I think we are splitting hairs here.
I live in Saskatchewan, industrial farming central for Canada.
They spray Round-up, on Round-up.
Farmers will even use it to dessicate a crop for faster harvest.
Life in small town full of cancered individuals on farms and in the little lchurches.
There are three dogs in this town named lumpy.
Speaking of lumps…..
If one looks to the Seralini study it is beyond a doubt that rats have large lumps…..or is that right; I’m sorry, they were using the wrong type of rat for the Seralini Round-up study.
They used the very rare white, and often lumpy and quite vicious ‘Italian Lumpy Dock Rat’.
Rather than the regular ole run of the mill flat lumpless ‘Lab Rat’.
The real truth; the pest Round-up is meant for is the human pest.
Think about it; Round-Up chelates minerals in the pest plant. Bonds to them.
What happens when Round-Up goes into your body.
http://www.gmoseralini.org/en/
My latest expansive post, not topical, is also about the erosion of sovereignty:
https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/israel-zionist-ambition-isis-and-us-affiliated-connections-part-two/
How long will the masses be satisfied with “nothing to see here” is the answer?
Best
OT
The Full Text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-full-text-of-the-trans-pacific-partnership-tpp/5486887
Reblogged this on John Barleycorn and commented:
Another secret treaty.
Reblogged this on Today,s Thought and commented:
Population control
“The parts of the TPP that cover food safety are especially troubling,” states the watchdog Food and Water Watch”
this is important information re the tpp. this is important information as well: the food and water watch is a un ngo. un ngos push for recognition, adherents, and donations. they are global in reach and are never ever grassroots or benign much less benevolent. they exist to amass power for the united nations. they are the enemy of all life on earth. acknowledging them as if they are useful, allies, normal, or uncompromised is empowering to the un.
i think it would be a good idea to stop acknowledging the ngos as anything other than what they are and not use them to back up claims or opinions – it gives people an incorrect impression of
the quality of such groups. they should be viewed as something that does not belong in a sane world – even though one would be hard-pressed to find a rights or environmental organization that is not a un ngo. i have not yet found one.