Australia, Canada, England, USA…medical dictatorship
by Jon Rappoport
August 11, 2015
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)
“Every year in the US, the medical system kills 225,000 people. Per decade, we’re talking about 2.25 million deaths. This is a conservative estimate.” (The Starfield Revelations, Jon Rappoport)
The truth is, I could have entered the name of any country in the world in the headline of this article.
But we begin with a story from the Star Tribune (Minneapolis) about testing for HIV: “Minnesota health care providers urge universal screening for HIV.” Several health providers in the area, serving more than 400,000 patients, are doing everything they can to push HIV testing during routine office visits—everything short of claiming the test is mandatory.
This, for a virus that has never been proved to cause “AIDS.” This for a virus which credible scientists say has never been shown to exist at all.
Buried in the Star Tribune article is an innocent-sounding statement:
“Under the Affordable Care Act [Obamacare], the HIV test is considered an essential preventive service, on par with mammograms, immunizations and colon cancer screening, which means that most health insurers must pay for it.”
Essential. Preventive. Service.
Translation: Under Obamacare, or any national health insurance plan in any country in the world, the government can decide what patients need. And as we are seeing with the global push to make vaccinations mandatory, these decisions can be turned into laws. Binding laws. Enforceable laws.
This, in fact, is the program, and it is gaining momentum. Behind every national health insurance plan lurks the intention to control patients and make them take tests, ingest drugs, and submit to injections, from cradle to grave.
It all begins as a “humanitarian” gesture. “We believe every person has the right to healthcare.” Once the national insurance plan is in place, the build-up begins:
“We know what’s best for you. Therefore, you must obey.”
The turn of the screw.
The State and their Pharma partners have no interest in examining evidence that the drugs and vaccines are toxic, despite the widespread availability of such evidence.
The State is essentially saying: “Look, we’re paying for your healthcare (through taxes, but we aren’t going to discuss that). We’re giving you a gift. So you must comply with the conditions of the gift. We’re giving you life itself. How can you refuse our orders?”
Mainstream media parrots simply push the line: “Medical treatment is a miracle. Every person is deserving and entitled. It’s a triumph.”
As the years roll by, we’ll see more emphasis on mandatory screening for diseases and mental disorders, followed by diagnoses and drugging with toxic compounds—all packaged in national insurance plans.
Obamacare was Obama’s number-one priority after inauguration as President for his first term. With good reason. As we now see in the several pending Globalist trade treaties, Pharma is a major beneficiary. Putting every human on Earth in a medical box, from birth to death, is a long-term goal of the Rockefeller Globalists.
What better way to control and debilitate and weaken populations, thus reducing their ability to resist a de facto, planet-wide, political and economic management system?
Forget the humanitarian gloss. Forget the glowing statements about “free healthcare.” Forget updated assertions about human rights. Forget political parties. Forget Left vs. Right. It’s a mirage.
And looking further up the road, the current research projects devoted to altering human DNA and brain function will be folded into medical treatment, via these national health insurance plans. In order to give patients “the best available care.”
Brave New World emanates from the State, the State collaborates with mega-corporations—and “science” is the carrier, the weapon.
At one time in the West, the Roman Church was able to exert enormous control over the lives of humans. The Church used doctrine, which it cast as revelation. Today, in those countries, science has attained a pinnacle. However, this, too, is doctrine. All it takes is a parade of so-called experts making statements to the press about “what science knows.”
Truth is the first casualty.
The many propagandists fronting for medical control specialize in looking down their noses, from a great height, at those who expose their crimes. They’ve developed a whole set of terms to minimize and marginalize their critics. But they, the propagandists, are the guilty parties. They are the ones who need to be put back on the defensive. They’re the ones who seek to infect us with their diseased information.
They’re the ones who falsely align themselves with “the greater good.” This is always the strategy of power-mad controllers and their minions.
To understand the primary means of population control and dominance, in any society, at any time, look to the strongest prevailing paradigm. Today, it’s science. Therefore, that becomes the instrument. It’s what the majority will believe.
Twisting and subverting the paradigm by taking it over is the method. This is done through establishing a series of authoritative centers, from which the paradigm is “explained,” for the masses.
Once the paradigm has been perverted, matrices are spun from it, with the intent of wrapping up the population in them.
When far-reaching empire is the goal, the process of hijacking, co-opting, and perverting the paradigm is a long-term operation. Decades, even centuries in some cases.
People who are unwilling to see this will tend to fall by the wayside. The struggle for liberation from a centralized paradigm is not won or lost in a day or a month.
It never was.
Lack of imagination is also fatal. Those who plead for an instant fix, a solution that will make the “bad people go away,” or one sweeping popular movement that will forever defeat the enemy are misguided.
There is no one solution. People with courage and imagination must launch many innovative campaigns, and they must invent them themselves. Enlisting support, they must become prime movers, not followers with Disney rainbows in their eyes.
This is one major reason why I tirelessly write and speak about individual imagination and power. It’s the heart and soul of the future and a truly open society.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
Just don’t go to the doctor.
The tetnus shot is on the list to attend school for a sixth grader. Pros and cons?
@bjacob131
just to add,…
are “tetnus (only)” shots still even manufactured in this day and age any more? meaning, it may say “tetnus (only)” on the paper or webpage,… but, come shot day, the doctor will most likely offer (your) child the 3-in-1 Dtap or Tdap vaccine, no?
Immunologist Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD, has some great info on the tetanus vax:
http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroom/tetanus-shot-how-do-we-know-that-it-works-by-tetyana-obukhanych-phd/
Many imperious pro-vax MDs who stand on the “science is settled” mantra have also said, “there aren’t any Immunologists who are against vaccines.” Well….docs here’s one with Dr. Obukhanych!
Are you an immunologist? How safe is the pertussis vaccine for someone who’s been floxed? What about side effects of a 12yo who had asthma and mold allergy?
Some perspective on tetanus:
“In the United States, the reported mortality due to tetanus has declined at a constant rate since the early 1900s, and documented tetanus incidence has declined since the mid- to late 1940s, when national reporting of tetanus cases began.
In 2009, a total of 19 tetanus cases and 2 deaths were reported to the national tetanus surveillance system.
Several factors have contributed to the decline in tetanus morbidity and mortality, including the widespread use of tetanus toxoid-containing vaccines since the late 1940s. Other factors include improved wound care management and the use of tetanus immune globulin (TIG) for postexposure prophylaxis in wound treatment and for the treatment of tetanus.”
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/surv-manual/chpt16-tetanus.html
“Tetanus … incidence is highest in developing countries. In most Western nations, however, the incidence is less than one case per million population per year.”
http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/4/738.full.pdf
IMO hygiene, prompt wound care and maintaining robust immunity through good nutrition and supplements makes this and other vaccines redundant.
What’s your opinion of the pertussis vaccine?
Just for the sake of it, let’s compare humans with cars.
The human body needs water and food.
The car needs gas and oil.
Imagine that the insurance car companies would make mandatory vaccines for cars. Hey, you never know, gas and oil could have viruses, you wouldn’t want that would you? So get your car vaccinated for safety.
And by the way, get a visit to your car dealer every season to get some tests on your car to avoid future misfortunes.
I’m surprised that these car insurance companies haven’t thought of that yet. Hey, big bucks to make here. The toxic vaccines would sure screw up your motor and jam your filter.
But that is the goal, isn’t it?
Get a new car or have it repaired.
The goose that keeps laying the golden eggs!
“An associate at Delaware University has a sensational claim: that the Ebola virus is a ‘genetically modified, lab-made virus’.”
http://naturalsociety.com/university-professor-says-ebola-is-a-genetically-modified-lab-made-virus/#ixzz3hd2VHSHR
“China to begin testing Ebola Vaccine on Human”
http://thaitribune.org/contents/detail/297?content_id=8106&rand=1439314753
The guillotine was a humanitarian invention. Before it was invented, wealthy people who were sentenced to death paid for a professional ax man because he could cut of a head in one chop. People who could not afford to pay got an ax man that might take 3 or 4 swings before the head would come off. With a guillotine, every body was equal: liberté, égalité, fraternité. Of course once it was ‘humanitarian’, many more people were sentenced to death.
Genocide may be endured if the population thinks it is fair. What is needed is a study showing that the insiders don’t follow the same rules that they tell you to follow. That might wake people up. I heard that some vaccines come from the factory in a single dose syringe while others comes in a bottle that the doctor uses to fill syringes. In the single dose vaccines, they do not contain many of the toxins that the common people are exposed to.
Some rich people like Magic Johnson are living with HIV for decades now and they don’t seem to be sick. Is it because they have money to hire smarter doctors? Are they taking an AZT cocktail? What are the HIV positive people who don’t get sick doing to stay healthy? Why have I never heard a story in the news that asks that question?
I glad you wove the Catholic Church into your progression of ideas. Good post, as usual, Jon.
Only a few minutes ago, I sent an e-mail out saying, “it’s not peoples’ ‘ability’ to understand that is in dispute, but rather the ‘will'”.
Interestingly, my latest exopolitician post (though not focusing on ‘medical’) explores the contest between lateral or fake communion and individual sovereignty from the twilight perspective.
https://exopolitician.wordpress.com/2015/08/07/the-power-of-communion-ism/
Best
OT
Hi Ozzie,
re: “it’s not peoples’ ‘ability’ to understand that is in dispute, but rather the ‘will’”.
was there a typo? namely, should “that” be “what”?
going further,… is the following equivalent wording for the intent of what you are saying?
“it’s not [within] peoples’ ‘ability’ to understand [w]hat is in dispute, but rather, [it is in peoples’ ‘ability’ to understand] the ‘will’ [of those who are in dispute with each other]”.
i’m just trying to clarify whether or not i understand you correctly.
Thank you, Theo.
No typo,
Let me rephrase, for clarity:
“It is not the peoples’ “ability to understand the issues” that is in dispute but, rather, their “will to accept alternative ‘truth paradigms’ that back their idea of a communal support system”.
The phenomenon happening currently is, when people “wake up” (in the realisation that the “system” is “rigged” – fully or partially) most have used it so thoroughly to guide every aspect of their lives – i.e. medical, “news”, “reality” and so on, they have nowhere to go.
Hope and humour kicks in as a cushion to validate flawed reasoning, such as,
“Mrs Clinton will get us out of this mess” or “This news anchor is ok. If only the others were like him” or “Yes I think medicine is mostly good but, you know, when will they [the system still “protecting” us] fix these “occasional” mistakes?”.
or “Police have to be violent; its their job” “I don’t really understand the science behind this” “Who do I believe; them or you?”
Society, in general, is aware and moving into the “denial”, “defection” (blame game) stage.
Hopefully, that’s clearer 🙂
Best
OT