Outrageous coverup of 1995 OKC bombing continues
by Jon Rappoport
July 27, 2014
Utah attorney Jesse Trentadue claims his brother, Kenneth, was killed during interrogation, in federal custody 19 years ago, because Kenneth resembled the “other suspect” in the OKC Bombing case, John Doe #2.
The FBI claims Kenneth, with “41 wounds and bruises (according to AP),” committed suicide.
Attorney Trentadue states there was another man with Tim McVeigh at the scene of the Bombing on April 19, 1995—and it wasn’t his brother.
The FBI claims McVeigh was alone.
To settle this issue, in 2009, as AP reported, the FBI finally gave Trentadue some security tapes from buildings near the Murrah Federal Building. Magically, the tapes were all blank just before and after the Murrah Building was blown up at 9:02AM on 4/15/95.
Now, Trentadue has filed a FOIA suit against the FBI. He wants more tapes. A trial begins Monday.
The FBI claims it can’t find more tapes.
Everybody connected to the OKC bombing case knows there is another reason the FBI is tap dancing and lying:
Actual video footage of the Murrah Building falling would show the fabled truck bomb didn’t cause the damage to the Building and didn’t kill 168 people inside.
Video footage would show a straight-down demolition-type collapse. Meaning: charges placed on the columns did the true damage.
In 1995, while investigating the Bombing, I interviewed 4 explosives experts, and they concurred that the force of an ANFO truck bomb would have dissipated rapidly in the open air and failed to create so much destruction.
More importantly and specifically, the profile of the damage (which columns remained, and which fell) excluded the possibility that a bomb in a truck was the weapon.
Some columns closer to the famed Ryder truck stayed up; other columns farther away went down.
Shortly after the Bombing in 1995, I spoke to a reporter at the Daily Oklahoman. She said she’d interviewed a man who’d seen the Murrah Building collapse. He told her it went straight down, demolition-style.
I managed to reach this witness. He said he didn’t really see the Building go down.
I got back to the reporter. She was furious. She told me she had his statement in her notes. “I’m not making this up,” she said.
I also interviewed Hoppy Heidelberg, a grand juror in the OKC Bombing case. He told me he’d tried to persuade the prosecutor to call bomb experts as witnesses, but he was flatly turned down.
In 1995, anti-federal-government sentiment was rapidly spreading across America. Then, in the wake of the Bombing, President Bill Clinton gave a landmark speech. He basically told Americans they should come home to the government, the destruction of a federal building and the killing of 168 people was a heinous act that proved the real attitude of these “anti-government” groups. But security would be restored.
The speech was heralded as a “return to order and confidence.” Major media coverage of popular opposition to federal power receded.
From 1995 on, Americans who asserted federal power had expanded far beyond Constitutional boundaries have been labeled as potential terrorists.
9/11 took that accusation to a whole new level:
“The central government is always right. Those who say it’s fundamentally wrong are dangerous and/or mentally ill.”
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
never forget what DOJ & the FBI did @ WACO !
Never forget what they did at Oklahoma City!
Major oddities: The missing workers on that morning, the murdered cop that was turning up info, the 2nd cop threatened threatened by the FBI. The local news coverage stating that many other devices were found in the building and disarmed, the missing video from surveillance cameras and more. Much more. This was a 9/11-style false flag.
Or Ruby Ridge
What was that officers name? I’ve been trying to get that info for some friends.
Never forget it was Hillary who told the Feds the day before the Waco fire: “Torch the Mother F***ers.” Remember it in 2016 when the bloodthirsty old succubus runs for Prez.
She is pure evil. I hope more people see it. I’m afraid she’s gonna play the “vote for me or your an ‘anti-feminist’ card”
[…] Outrageous coverup of 1995 OKC Bombing continues. […]
Reblogged this on BLOGGING BAD w/Gunny G ~ "CLINGERS-AMERICA!".
Eric Holder was involved in the planning and execution of OKC as he was in the fake Sandy Hook shootings. Sandy Hook school was closed 3 years prior to FBI exercise as evidenced lack of utility usage at that address and other records. Rothschild controlled MSM lies
“Sandy Hook school was closed 3 years prior to FBI exercise as evidenced lack of utility usage at that address and other records.”
*VERY* interesting…
Link! Link! Link!
Please and thank you…
He was at Waco, too. If I’m not mistaken, he was in charge of the OKC investigation meaning spread the crime scene tape so nobody has access/. Dick Morris in one of his books (i.e. it’s in print so documentable) says Clinton was going to fire Janet Reno and she said no dice, I’ll tell all. Just to check my memory, looked up the Wikipedia for Holder’s “resume” since he was at both places…references to Waco and OKC entirely scrubbed. But I did find confirmation in bunches of alternative sources. Thanks for telling it like it is…the tweet folks are using YCMTSU.but who woulda thunk how long it’s gone on.
Greetings Breathren & Good Neighbors,
As there are amongst us, those who where studiously aware of certain federal & state social aberrations operating as rogue federal & state agencies, from the execution of Gordon Kahl, imprisonment of Leonard Peltier, of AIM leaders, The Singer Family (Utah), executions of Mothers & children at Ruby Ridge (idaho), Waco (Texas), and common law townships, supreme courts, both county, state and national grand juries and common law courts, ordained more in tune with your organic social compacts by the humble efforts of the Montana Freeman and the fruits thereof, all collectively for more than a three decades seeking further recognition of their unalienable natural absolute rights, seeking hopefully, good will as good neighbors similarly situated, we ask, to wit:
How long will our slain innocence remain unredeemed or our fallen leaders suffer the ignominious insults for falling short in facing your chaotic reality, sacrificing all, while seeking to preserve your inherent statecraft in courtship naturally endowed, where necessity compels us, in the common good of all walks of life seeking good will in the interest of universal peace with all walks of life seeking to be similarly situated naturally speaking?
Note: Oklahoma City incident at the federal Murray bldg., is not aforementioned, because, it was a federal socio-engineered intelligence operation, to cover up records germane to establishing the true reasons for Waco, unlike the out and out federal murder of innocence aforementioned.
All our best to you and your loved ones.
Until then, I AM…Your friend in law!
Most graciously….’In Honor We Trust’
Secretariat
Link: http://www.seagov.net/
Notice: U.P.C. Applicable.
P.S.: Please forgive any syntax or grammatical errors.
Reblogged this on Johnsono ne'Blog'as.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWwrEEP8EBk if you have doubts of government involvement.
[…] http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/07/27/outrageous-coverup-of-1995-okc-bombing-continues/ […]
[…] Jon Rappaport, more here: http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/07/27/outrageous-coverup-of-1995-okc-bombing-continues/ […]
Retired USAF Gen Ben Parton PROVED the AMFO blast from the truck only broke windows. AMFO is a POOR explosive for air-coupled targets. In other words, it is good for blowing out stumps in farmer’s fields and other such things when in ACTUAL CONTACT with those objects. Since the explosive power diminishes in a light squared fashion (double the distance, lose FOUR times the energy), the blast, even though powerful at the center, would have fallen off to around 300 FPS at the building. This was only enough to break glass. Reinforced concrete takes a MINIMUM of 3,000 FPS to start it to fail!
[…] Outrageous coverup of 1995 OKC Bombing continues Posted on July 28, 2014, 7:26 am By Larry Newman […]
If a truck bomb in the open could not do the type of damage done in OKC, does that mean a truck bomb in the open did not cause the death and damage at the Marine barracks in Beruit? Beruit kind of negates your argument.
Not really. They used 2000 pounds of explosives and actually drove into the barracks… Completely different actually and cannot babe used in comparrison.
So, what is the comparison that does prove the hypothesis?
I once worked in sandstone mines in N.Az where AMFO was used regularly. AMFO was the explosive of choice because it produced enough energy to fracture the rock but not enough to reduce it to gravel. The Beirut Barracks Bombing used military grade high explosives; if we had been using the same all we would have gotten is the “sand” part of “sandstone”. Your comparing a “cherry bomb” to a stick of TNT….., just saying…..
Cool point. If you would of used an entire truck load, what kind of damage would it have done?
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWwrEEP8EBk . There were military grade bombs in the basement. Do we really know what happened in beruit?
You just introduced two fallacies 1. a loaded question and 2. false dilemma. You could be a politician.
I am sorry I thought all arguments on the net were illogical fallacies
My point is, while I am totally on board with the conspiracy of OKC, you need more than letters to make a statement true and just saying unless you can show a comparison or test, it is speculation
the marine barracks is not a very good comparison to the structure of the building in Oklahoma! comparing a house made of clay to one made of reinforced steel and concrete!
Are you totally daft Barkie? Why would Beruit negate Jon’s argument? Two diametrically opposite circumstances! Ryder rental truck parked on street well away from the building with low grade fertilizer/diesel composite compared to a mission specialized vehicle driven into the building before detonation. In the words of watersteret2013’s excellent article on the history behind Beruit,
( http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/27/1251119/-Hoaxes-101-Losing-241-at-Beirut-in-1983-Didn-t-Happen-No-More# )
“The Iranians supplied technology to detonate a very large liquid-butane-and-PETN bomb sitting over marble base. They mounted the bombs on thick marble slabs to maximize the shock wave. They armored the engine and the drivers’ cockpit…
…This LB/PETN type of truck bomb creates a thermobaric shock wave. It rivals the destructive force of a small nuke. It powders concrete up close. It sends debris flying out that can kill human beings as far as a mile away.
The building used for Marine BLT Barracks was solid reinforced concrete with strong iron rebar supports. It was reduced to rubble in an instant. Rescuing injured servicemen was complicated by the shear mass of the building. Twisted rebar supports, still welded together, made removal efforts uniquely difficult.”
Yes, probably am daft, but doesn’t change the fact that saying that truck bomb could not bring down that building is out of the butt speculation with no evidence to support it
One can always spot a government troll, Barky. It’s because you are all so identical, like little assembly-line, wind-up rabbits hopping about with the kinetic energy of a spring. Okay, I outed you. Now what?
Well, you can always spot an internet idiot because they accuse anyone who disagrees with factless arguments by the every thing is a conspiracy crowd as being a government plant.
Very tired argument.
@Barkley
Here is where you finally fail.
“Official versions” are no different to labelled “conspiracies” because believers must have faith in theories which are not supported by facts and hard evidence but, rather, suppositions based on third party accounts and/or unwitnessed “props”. Believers on both sides merely rely on INFORMATION.
When put to the test, aided by logic and strong intellectual debate, “official versions” rarely parry well against “conspiracies”. Indeed “official versions” occasionally fall in a heap; much to the embarrassment of programmed mainstream “news” pundits, invariably don’t make [common] sense and always are politically biased.
@Adam
Agreed. Barkley is daft. The circumstances, story and detail of Beirut and OTC are worlds apart. These guys specialise in drumming out-of-context, misleading or false comparisons. Well spotted!
[…] http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/07/27/outrageous-coverup-of-1995-okc-bombing-continues/ […]
[…] Outrageous coverup of 1995 OKC Bombing continuesJul27 […]
Initially, the OKC bombing was important to every American, but it has been OBE (Overcome By Events) almost weekly to the point that no issue stays in the news over one week.
Remember Eric Holder was working for the department of justice during the Oklahoma bombing. He just wasn’t in charge then he is now and is carrying on the tyranny in a big and racist way!
Look how similar “Bali”, Australia’s 911, was to OTC.
Interesting that there are claims the OTC was brought down by “special explosives” not regularly available and it was, actually, a Mossad managed op as precursor to 911.
Bali, allegedly, was levelled by a “suitcase” mini-nuke, just like the ones that “were” under Fukushima.
How can so many nasty events be connected to one repugnant group?
when I was in school, this was just a couple years before, my chemist prof, was one that worked on this case, and he would tell us over and over that no truck could do that ryder or not. he said it would have taken 6-10 of those trucks to produce the damage done that day and he had several patents out and was top prof at my school.
I had that same teacher. He molested me on many occasions. Perhaps we should talk.
Was Lois Lerner in charge of the tape archive? Hmmm?
[…] Outrageous coverup of 1995 OKC bombing continues […]
[…] http://sgtreport.com/2014/07/outrageous-coverup-of-1995-okc-bombing-continues/ Read More […]
I think the fact that he calls you “Barky” kind of proves he’s right, don’t you?
[…] courtesy of jonrappoport.wordpress.com […]