The James Holmes Batman-murder psychiatric circus
by Jon Rappoport
April 28, 2014
This article is not about all the contradictions and inconsistencies in the official story of “the Batman murders” at the Aurora Theater. This article is about the use of psychiatry in the judicial system.
Judge Carlos Samour has ordered James Holmes to undergo a second sanity review. Holmes’ lawyers are appealing that order, so once again, everything is on hold.
Holmes has already entered a plea of insanity, meaning he committed the murders but was crazy at the time. And he’s already had one sanity review in a hospital. But the Judge didn’t like that review, and neither did the prosecution. Why? No one is permitted to say, but it’s obvious the prosecution is upset because the first review concluded that Holmes was/is insane….unable to tell right from wrong.
The prosecution wants the case to end up with a guilty verdict and the death penalty, not with an insane Holmes assigned to a prison hospital as a psychotic.
The Judge wants the second sanity review to focus tightly on whether Holmes was sane or insane on the night he “killed people in the theater.”
So how do psychiatrists decide that question?
In order to do so, they have to go through Holmes himself.
Is Holmes now sane? Can he look back and provide an accurate account of his state of mind then?
“Well, I’m quite sane now, and I can see I knew right from wrong then.”
Sure.
If Holmes is sane now (whatever that means), why should he admit he was sane then and risk dying at the hands of the State? If he’s sane now, he’ll say, “I was crazy that night. I couldn’t tell right from wrong.”
How do the psychiatrists navigate through that?
If Holmes is insane now, whatever he remembers about that night in the theater should be automatically discounted and ignored.
But psychiatrists, with their pseudoscience, have a reputation to uphold. They have to make it seem as if they know what they’re doing. They have to pretend their word games and their diagnoses are connected to the reality of the mind.
That isn’t the case, of course. No official diagnosis of any so-called mental disorder has a defining test to back it up. It’s all a hoax.
Eventually, after their second sanity review, psychiatrists will enter an opinion with the court. They’ll claim that some sort of objective analysis was done on Holmes, bypassing his fractured mental state. They’ll sell their snake oil to the Judge.
And he’ll buy it, because psychiatric reviews are part and parcel of the modern judicial system.
The bottom line? Aided by the sold-out political establishment, the men who really want to control the destiny of this country are using psychiatry and the “mental health” system to create a Police State.
“Everybody has a mental disorder, and must be treated.”
UPI is now reporting that 1 out of every 13 schoolchildren between the ages of 6 and 17 is on a prescription psychiatric drug. These drugs, all of them, are toxic. They sedate the brain. They initiate out-of-control hyper-manic states. They scramble neurotransmitters. The SSRI antidepressants, in particular, push people over the edge into violence; suicide, homicide. Holmes himself was under psychiatric care prior to Aurora.
These drugs are chemical warfare, eating out the population from the inside.
James Holmes is a poster boy for the mental-health system.
“If only his disorder had been caught sooner, if only he were treated, we could have avoided the tragedy in Aurora.”
Therefore, children must be screened and monitored from an early age, diagnosed, and dosed with drugs.
Whether Holmes’ second sanity review comes back with the finding that he was insane in Aurora, the story-line has already been set in concrete: he was suffering from a mental disorder. That fits the overall agenda. That promotes the necessity of psychiatry judging and running the minds of every person.
Freedom dictates the opposite.
Some of you may be wondering about my statement that psychiatry is a pseudoscience based on nothing more than arbitrary fantasies.
Here is just a bit of the evidence for that assertion:
Under the radar, one of the great psychiatric stars, who has been out in front inventing mental disorders, went public. He blew the whistle on himself and his colleagues. And for 3 years, almost no one noticed.
His name is Dr. Allen Frances, and he made VERY interesting statements to Gary Greenberg, author of a Wired article: “Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness.” (Dec.27, 2010).
Major media never picked up on the interview in any serious way. It never became a scandal.
Dr. Allen Frances is the man who, in 1994, headed up the project to write the latest edition of the psychiatric bible, the DSM-IV. This tome defines and labels and describes every official mental disorder. The DSM-IV eventually listed 297 of them.
Long after the DSM-IV had been put into print, Dr. Frances talked to Wired’s Greenberg and said the following:
“There is no definition of a mental disorder. It’s bullshit. I mean, you just can’t define it.”
BANG.
That’s on the order of the designer of the Hindenburg, looking at the burned rubble on the ground, remarking, “Well, I knew there would be a problem.”
After a suitable pause, Dr. Frances remarked to Greenberg, “These concepts [of distinct mental disorders] are virtually impossible to define precisely with bright lines at the borders.”
Frances might have been referring to the fact that his baby, the DSM-IV, had rearranged earlier definitions of ADHD and Bipolar to permit many MORE diagnoses, leading to a vast acceleration of drug-dosing with highly powerful and toxic compounds.
Finally, at the end of the Wired interview, Frances flew off into a bizarre sojourn:
“Diagnosis [as spelled out in the DSM-IV] is part of the magic…you know those medieval maps? In the places where they didn’t know what was going on, they wrote ‘Dragons live here’…we have a dragon’s world here. But you wouldn’t want to be without the map.”
Translation: Patients need hope for the healing of their troubles; so even if we psychiatrists are shooting blanks and pretending to know one kind of mental disorder from another, even if we’re inventing these mental-disorder definitions based on no biological or chemical diagnostic tests—it’s a good thing, because patients will then believe and have hope; they’ll believe because psychiatrists place a name on their problems…
Needless to say, this has nothing to do with science. Or healing.
Here is a smoking-gun statement made by another prominent psychiatrist, on an episode of PBS’ Frontline series. The episode was: “Does ADHD Exist?”
PBS FRONTLINE INTERVIEWER: Skeptics say that there’s no biological marker—that it [ADHD] is the one condition out there where there is no blood test, and that no one knows what causes it.
BARKLEY (Dr. Russell Barkley, professor of psychiatry and neurology at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center): That’s tremendously naïve, and it shows a great deal of illiteracy about science and about the mental health professions. A disorder doesn’t have to have a blood test to be valid. If that were the case, all mental disorders would be invalid…There is no lab test for any mental disorder right now in our science. That doesn’t make them invalid. [Emphasis added]
Without intending to, Dr. Barkley blows the whistle on his own profession.
So let’s take Dr. Barkley to school. Medical science, and disease-research in particular, rests on the notion that you can make a diagnosis backed up by lab tests. If you can’t produce lab tests, you’re spinning fantasies.
These fantasies might be hopeful, they might be “educated guesses,” they might be launched from traditional centers of learning, they might be backed up by billions of dollars of grant money…but they’re still fantasies.
Dr. Barkley employs a corrupted version of logic in his statement to the PBS Frontline interviewer. Barkley is essentially saying, “There is no lab test for any mental disorder. If a test were the standard of proof, we wouldn’t have psychiatry at all, our whole profession would rest on nothing—and that is patently absurd, so therefore a test doesn’t matter.”
That logic is no logic at all. Barkley is proving the case against himself. He just doesn’t want to admit it.
Psychiatry is a pseudoscience. A fake.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
You are 100 percent correct.
A big hoax to make $$$ for big pharma.
Corruption and abuse by forcing mind alternating meds on humans.
Using humans for big pharmacy experiments
There has been something about the James Holmes story which has bothered and still bothers me. There are quite a few things that don’t add up. But the thing that bothers me is that after looking at absolutely everything, and applying logic to the matter, it really appears that Holmes is a victim. It appears that he was drugged and there are other people involved — people involved in drugging him and some other things. And I imagine he is still being drugged. Nothing about his history, his childhood, anything, adds up to make sense of the story that has been fed to us. And the story itself doesn’t add up. Either there are important pieces missing that will tie together and make sense of this story, or there is a reason it doesn’t make sense: because it is a fabrication.
It is so hard to know that Holmes is very probably an innocent, framed-up victim in this, quite possibly because of his father’s profession, and there is nothing any of us can do about it. As well as all of the other drugged victims in this country, on psychiatric meds that do permanent damage while we tell ourselves we are “treating mental illness.”
This article is an excellent start, though, on explaining how the courts make use of the false profession of psychiatry.
Is there, I wonder, a “not guilty because I’m innocent, AND I was also temporarily insane because someone drugged me and I’m a victim here, too” defense?
I believe you are so right. None of it “adds up.” I think Holmes was a victim of the MK Ultra mind control program. So many details point to this and reinforce the truth that they have HARD, trauma-based mind control down to a highly advanced level. Almost a science. Manchurian candidates are real and they’re ready to be activated. All it takes are a few cryptic key words. John Frankenheimer knew as much. The truth is hiding in plain sight.
Look up ‘devils breath’ it is a mind control substance.
Question ; How is it possible for an AR-15 bullet/bullets(shot from theater #9) able to penetrate ,pass thru and exit(striking patrons in theater #8 Mckayla Hicks in the jaw) the common dense sound-proof wall separating Cinema 16 theater #9 and theater#8? The AR-15 utilizes an .223 CALIBER bullet. Movie theater viewing venues are scientifically designed and require an 65db stc class sound wall separating viewing studios. This separation wall can-not be penetrated because it requires dense mass usually 12″ concrete block with all block cells filled with sand. The AR-15 .223 bullet is too light a caliber. Why is it James Holmes Attorneys have not introduced the above mentioned scientific fact into Mr .Holmes defense ?
Fact…Cinema 16 theater #8 witnesses state hearing loud gunshots in Theater #8 that were louder than the gunfire emanating from the Batman Movie.
Prosecution theorizes the loud gunshots were coming from Theater#9 and alleges Mr. Holmes is the shooter.
Fact…The common wall separating Theater#9 from Theater#8 is a sound-proof wall. Sound waves from gunshots if heard at all by the Witnesses in Theater#8 would be muffled not louder than gunfire sounds from the Batman Movie. The loud gunshots heard by the Theater#8 Witnesses had to have come from within the confines of Theater#8.
Fact…Cinema16 Multiplex Theater is DHX certified; this DHX sound certification requires the Multiplex Theater to have dense sound walls separating Viewing Studios.
Prosecution presents no Facts only theory. Conclusion… Mr. Holmes did not shoot any patrons viewing the Batman Movie in Theater#8.
The attacks on Theater#9 and Theater#8 were separate, isolated, concurrent, and coordinated.
One or more Shooters in Theater#9…One or more Shooters Theater#8
[…] The James Holmes Batman-murder psychiatric circus « Jon Rappoport’s Blog. […]
Every one of these young mass shooters has had some kind of exposure to psychiatrists BEFORE their rampages. FIRST comes the mental health ‘treatment,’ THEN comes the ultraviolence. It’s called mind control.
you can easily know that Holmes is innocent, with 100% certainty
walk into any theater, while a movie is being projected onto the screen
turn to face the audience
the projector lamp is VERY powerful — it is flickering an extremely bright light into your eye (into your mind actually) at 30 cycles per second
now try to see the outlines of the shadows of the people in the audience — you might see the dim reflection from the flickering light but the power of the projection lamp will overpower your concentration — they are extremely powerful
now try to imagine aiming a gun, at a crowd in shadows, while the eye is bombarded with an intense flickering light
now try to imagine scoring bullseye after bullseye, hitting backlit targets while the light is flickering in your eye
he was setup
what a frightening mess he must be in
Batman shooting was staged by a group of professional black ops thugs who left Holmes behind as the patsy. Case closed.
im thinking more like was a victim of psyops. im betting some of these drill practices, are to entrap people for set ups. tell him hell be working on some terror drill, day of drill dress person up drop them at location all drugged out and leave them to take all the heat….. same as sandy hook. no pictures leading up to school, getting out of car, and 3 black sweatshirts on the ground outside of car with all doors open. did the cops just get hot all of a sudden and take their black sweatshirts off before bringing in the bomb sniffing dogs? lol. same thing for the tarsenov brothers. two people from same foreign country , both land scholarships, both get ebt cards even after one droped out still received money. yet there are news stories of how hard it is for college students to get on ebt cards, lol.
lesson: DONT SIGN UP TO DO A DRILL EVER, EVEN IF PAID.
[…] …read more […]
I have yet to be convinced Holmes did anything. A lot of evidence points in another direction.
[…] The James Holmes Batman-murder psychiatric circus […]
Crisis actors, yet another violation of our rights. The gov’t constantly violates our rights.
They violate the 1st Amendment by caging protesters and banning books like “America Deceived II”.
They violate the 4th and 5th Amendment by allowing TSA to grope you.
They violate the entire Constitution by starting undeclared wars.
Impeach Obama.
Last link of “America Deceived II” before it is completely banned:
http://www.amazon.com/America-Deceived-II-Possession-interrogation/dp/1450257437
[…] The James Holmes Batman-murder psychiatric circus « Jon Rappoport’s Blog […]
Dear ‘Groucho’ Rappoport, I expect you’ll soon be telling us that there ain’t no sanity cause?
With apologies to all … yes this a serious issue. Keep uncovering fakery, Jon, but sadly too many people live on it & couldn’t imagine life without it.
“A Brief History of SSRI Shootings” (13:36), published by corbettreport on 16 April 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbBL870Cxns
boilingfrogspost also published this video:
“Medicated to Death: SSRIs and Mass Killings”,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeM0W9duWPg
I’ll quote the text description for the BFP posting of the video.
Quote:
SSRI stands for Selective Seratonin Reuptake Inhibitor, and it is a class of drugs that is often used to treat depression and anxiety. It includes Prozac, Zoloft, Celexa, Paxil and a host of other commonly prescribed antidepressants. And the perpetrators of a raft of school shootings, mass murders and other violent incidents in recent years have been taking them.
Find out more about the correlation between SSRIs and mass murder in this week’s edition of the BoilingFrogsPost.com
End quote
Reblogged this on ActivistPoster.
The murderer James Eagan Holmes had a degree of neuroscience and was a Ph.D. student of neuroscience (
http://WWW.DenverPost.com/news/ci_21124892/theater-shooting-suspect-holmes-quiet-man
and
http://WWW.Lex18.com/news/shooting-suspect-was-graduate-student-at-colorado-medical-school
and
http://En.Wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Eagan_Holmes#Education_and_career
). This does not indicate much competence of neuroscientists because they did not predict that he would murder people.
Jon Rappopport, mr frances said dragons live here and he has a map. To aggressively confuscate the matter to which he is an authority on -that should be the disorder. Involve spirituality in the healing of our wounds for we have all been manipulated.
I do not know about psychiatry or the mental state of Mr. Holmes; but I do know that Mr. Holmes did
not shoot anybody in Cinema 16 #8. Specifically Ms. Mckayla Hicks a victim that was viewing the movie in Theater #8. Here is a question that begs for an answer!
Question ; How is it possible for an AR-15 bullet/bullets(shot from theater #9) able to penetrate ,pass thru and exit(striking patrons in theater #8 Mckayla Hicks in the jaw) the common dense sound-proof wall separating Cinema 16 theater #9 and theater#8? The AR-15 utilizes an .223 CALIBER bullet. Movie theater viewing venues are scientifically designed and require an 65db stc class sound wall separating viewing studios. This soundproof separation wall can-not be penetrated because it requires dense mass usually 12″ concrete block with all block cells filled with sand. The AR-15 .223 bullet is too light a caliber. Why is it James Holmes Attorneys have not introduced the above mentioned scientific fact into Mr .Holmes defense ?
Fact…Cinema 16 theater #8 witnesses state hearing loud gunshots in Theater #8 that were louder than the gunfire emanating from the Batman Movie.
Prosecution theorizes the loud gunshots were coming from Theater#9 and alleges Mr. Holmes is the shooter.
Fact…The common wall separating Theater#9 from Theater#8 is a sound-proof wall. Sound waves from gunshots if heard at all by the Witnesses in Theater#8 would be muffled not louder than gunfire sounds from the Batman Movie. The loud gunshots heard by the Theater#8 Witnesses had to have come from within the confines of Theater#8.
Fact…Cinema16 Multiplex Theater is DHX certified; this DHX sound certification requires the Multiplex Theater to have dense sound walls separating Viewing Studios.
Prosecution presents no Facts only theory. Conclusion… Mr. Holmes did not shoot any patrons viewing the Batman Movie in Theater#8.
The attacks on Theater#9 and Theater#8 were separate, isolated, concurrent, and coordinated.
One or more Shooters in Theater#9…One or more Shooters Theater#8
The above Facts were posted on Denver Post blog and were removed from the DP blog after posting and I have been blacklisted from Denver Post. These same Facts were also sent to James Holmes Attorneys. The above facts are not conspiracy theory they are scientific Fact!
Question… Why isn’t James Holmes being tried in a Federal Court as a domestic terrorist? Aside from 9/11 is this Cinema 16 shooting not the greatest domestic terrorist act recorded? Should this crime come under the Dept.of Homeland Security and the Justice Dept,?