by Jon Rappoport
February 27, 2013
(To join our email list, click here.)
“Newborn Screening in America,” a report from the Council for Responsible Genetics, states: “Before they are even a week old, ninety-eight percent of the 4.3 million babies born annually in the United States have a small sample of blood taken from their heels.”
The report continues: “These newborn bloodspots (NBS) are then screened for a variety of inherited conditions and may later be stored in state-operated databases…parents are often unaware of these screening programs and their consent options.”
This shocking national program, flying under the radar, is of course explained as a humane medical undertaking. But there is no across-the-board genetic treatment for any disease or illness. All the “maybe-possibly-in-the-future-cure” nonsense does nothing to justify this rank incursion on newborns and their unsuspecting families.
The report goes on: “With respect to [bloodspot] sample storage and use, there is also little transparency regarding storage procedures or the use of the samples after they have been screened…many states do not have clearly articulated policies about consent for the storage and use of samples or may not effectively communicate these policies to parents.”
Then there is the question of who now has, or will have in the future, access to all these millions of blood samples and the results of the genetic screening.
Reliable and trustworthy assurances of citizen-privacy from the government have gone the way of the dinosaur and other extinct species.
Let’s see…DNA samples of nearly every newborn baby in America: surveillance and tracking, anyone? We have here the makings of a universal DNA database for “crime prevention.”
Controversial legislation introduced to obtain a DNA sample from every adult? It’s already being done covertly in hospitals, at birth.
What about technocrats obsessed with re-engineering humans? What about other researchers who want to run comparative DNA studies in thousands of different ways, for any purpose under the sun—who for example are intensely interested in making (or inventing) genetic distinctions between various socioeconomic sectors of society? This newborn database is irresistible.
You can be sure social, medical, and genetic engineers are looking at all this raw data like wild animals look at prey on the plains.
The idea of correlating genetic factors with “failure in life” is the Holy Grail for eugenicists. They will find a way to gain access to the data, because they want to build “a better world” and eliminate the “inferior” people.
Right now, we have rapid abortionists who earnestly believe and advocate the destruction of life after birth as a viable option. They even call it abortion. So a doctor could tell a parent, “The genetic profile of your baby is very problematic. You should consider terminating life…”
Again, all this illegal and immoral collection of genetic data from babies is justified as a “humane medical endeavor.” So ask your doctor, “Where is the ironclad proof that you have any genetic treatment for any disease that works across the board?” Don’t accept blue-sky predictions and promises.
Get real.
Because the State is getting real. They want control. And taking blood samples from babies is a giant step on the road to a genetic dictatorship.
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
To read Jon’s articles on Substack, click here.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
[…] Explosive report: 98% of newborn babies are genetically screened […]
[…] Jon Rappoport February 27, 2013 […]
[…] Rappoport Nomorefakenews.com February 27, […]
[…] Keep on reading @ jonrappoport.wordpress.com […]
This is very alarming. I read this has been going on since 1990 with a huge depository in Texas. Each persons DNA has a specific resonance/vibration and in the future it will be the GPS base. No device required.
[…] No More Fake News | Feb 27, 2013 […]
This blood “screening” just confirms what I feel, earth is controlled – the census (birth registration) goes back to biblical days. Why do people fill out the birth certificate forms – to conform or? Nevermind the hospitals make money for every birth/social security number they get registered when you’re in the hospital and vulnerable.
Glad the comment section is available today. Yesterday it was not accessible – “Post Comment” did not show up!
Reblogged this on msarroub.
[…] By Jon Rappoport | Jon Rappoport’s Blog […]
I fought this tooth and nail back in the 80’s in Arizona with the birth of my first child. Unfortunately at that time, I was far too young and dumb to realize what it was all about. I am so sorry for participating and would take it back if I could.
I think this is DNA testing is also being done to adults. My Doctor told me I do not have Diabetes and would NEVER get Diabetes. How would he know this unless DNA testing had been done during my regular blood tests without my knowledge? Big Brother is watching everything !
[…] See on jonrappoport.wordpress.com […]
When my daughter was born in 08 they pricked her little foot for 2days he on the hr when I asked why they said we’re just checking her for diabetes. I was tired and obviously drugged after giving birth when we took her home her tiny feet we’re just so bruised and purple. After reading this I wonder how many times did they really have to to that to check for diabetes? I’m extremely angry that it took me 5yrs to one what they were really up to 🙁 mommas sorry baby girl!
[…] http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/02/27/explosive-report-98-of-newborn-babies-are-genetically-s… […]
[…] Thus, a program which began in the 1960s under the auspices of screening newborns for phenylketonuria (PKU) in the state of Massachusetts has now grown to encompass virtually every single newborn in the United States. Aside from the fact that genetic causes for diseases is by no means an exact science and that there is little evidence that there is any “genetic treatment” that is actually effective, the idea of testing children for potential health issues is not, in and of itself, a frightening prospect. What is at issue is that the DNA material of virtually every American newborn is now being collected at birth, placed in a database operated by the government which parents are even largely unaware, and that material is subsequently provided to “researchers.” As Jon Rappoport writes, […]
[…] Thus, a program which began in the 1960s under the auspices of screening newborns for phenylketonuria (PKU) in the state of Massachusetts has now grown to encompass virtually every single newborn in the United States. Aside from the fact that genetic causes for diseases is by no means an exact science and that there is little evidence that there is any “genetic treatment” that is actually effective, the idea of testing children for potential health issues is not, in and of itself, a frightening prospect. What is at issue is that the DNA material of virtually every American newborn is now being collected at birth, placed in a database operated by the government which parents are even largely unaware, and that material is subsequently provided to “researchers.” As Jon Rappoport writes, […]
[…] What is at issue is that the DNA material of virtually every American newborn is now being collected at birth, placed in a database operated by the government which parents are even largely unaware, and that material is subsequently provided to “researchers.” As Jon Rappoport writes, […]
[…] As Jon Rappoport writes, […]
[…] As Jon Rappoport writes, […]
[…] Thus, a program which began in the 1960s under the auspices of screening newborns for phenylketonuria (PKU) in the state of Massachusetts has now grown to encompass virtually every single newborn in the United States. Aside from the fact that genetic causes for diseases is by no means an exact science and that there is little evidence that there is any “genetic treatment” that is actually effective, the idea of testing children for potential health issues is not, in and of itself, a frightening prospect. What is at issue is that the DNA material of virtually every American newborn is now being collected at birth, placed in a database operated by the government which parents are even largely unaware, and that material is subsequently provided to “researchers.” As Jon Rappoport writes, […]
[…] As Jon Rappoport writes, […]
[…] Thus, a program which began in the 1960s under the auspices of screening newborns for phenylketonuria (PKU) in the state of Massachusetts has now grown to encompass virtually every single newborn in the United States. Aside from the fact that genetic causes for diseases is by no means an exact science and that there is little evidence that there is any “genetic treatment” that is actually effective, the idea of testing children for potential health issues is not, in and of itself, a frightening prospect. What is at issue is that the DNA material of virtually every American newborn is now being collected at birth, placed in a database operated by the government which parents are even largely unaware, and that material is subsequently provided to “researchers.” As Jon Rappoport writes, […]