Astounding: Miss America contestant will have both breasts removed, and she doesn’t have cancer
by Jon Rappoport
November 29, 2012
Allyn Rose (twitter), 24, has announced she’ll have a double mastectomy after the Miss America pageant is over.
She doesn’t have cancer.
“If I were to win [the contest]…I would have this incredible platform to speak to my generation…” Rose said.
Rose has been making the rounds of media outlets, announcing her intention, promoting what can only be called the medically-assisted culture of self-mutilation.
Read Mike Adam’s devastating article about the new study showing mammograms produce vast over-diagnosis of non-existent cancers, leading to cut-burn-poison treatments.
The case of Allyn Rose goes even beyond that. She has received no diagnosis of cancer. This is now a growing trend: precautionary mastectomies.
In Rose’s case, it’s about a marker, called Wiskott-Aldrich, which signals a very rare immune disorder, almost always found in boys.
Rose has been called a carrier. She is without symptoms.
But because this marker is said to run in her mother’s family, because her mother died at a young age, as a result of breast cancer, and because, we are told, breast cancer “runs in her mother’s family,” Allyn Rose has decided to have both her breasts removed.
Medical literature claims a high correlation between this Wiskott-Aldrich marker and cancers. But breast cancer specifically?
The director of the Wiskott-Aldrich foundation, Dr. Sumathi Iyengar, told the Washington Post’s Reliable Source there was only some anecdotal evidence pointing to a possible connection.
I spoke with Dr. Iyengar and she was much more emphatic, stressing there is “no evidence” proving a link between the Wiskott-Aldrich marker and breast cancer.
On this basis, a healthy young woman of 24 is having both her breasts removed; she has been hailed as a hero; and she will go on the road and function as a promoter for her cause.
Naturally, Allyn Rose is working with the Susan Komen Foundation, notorious for its propaganda about the need for mammograms and “early diagnosis” and treatment.
What message will Rose be sending to young impressionable girls who want to gain status, recognition, and praise? The answer is obvious. Suddenly, popularity and acclaim are just one surgery away.
Major media outlets are playing along, of course. Where are the medical reporters raising objections? Nowhere.
Jon Rappoport
The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
This is a hideous turn of events. I worked in the operating room for over 40 years, and I don’t know of any respectable surgeon having integrity who’d even do this operation. Beyond that why would any insurance company pay for it?
Oh, the wonderful science of genetics! It has “improved” our food, allowed us to blame our ancestors for our behavior, and now provides a convenient scapegoat for our toxic environment. “You didn’t get cancer because the food you eat, water you drink and air you breathe are poison, you’re born with it!” And an innocent pair of boobies are going to pay the price for this insanity? …
This is literally insane, just insane. They might want to have her checked for mental stability.
When there is a strong family history of breast cancer, it can be very clear that there is a mutated gene. In 60% of these cases that gene can be identified as BRCA1 or BRCA2. But in 40% of these families the gene cannot be identified, but the doctors and genetic counselors clearly know that a mutation is present. With a strong family history it may be clear there IS such a mutated gene as the statistically it would be extremely unlikely for that much breast cancer to be in one family without there being a mutated gene. After you watch two of three first degree relatives die of breast cancer, you may opt to protect your life over your breasts. This young woman is making a difficult, sad and brave decision. The writer of this piece does not seem to understand women if he truly thinks young women will be flocking to operating rooms to have their breasts removed. What an idiotic thing to say! Best wishes to this brave young woman, who will be saving lives by telling her story that will reach some young women in families with heritable breast cancer.
dont do it miss! you may miss them. things there are there for a reason.
what if you want to breast feed or sweat? you may experience other complications if you ever got pregnant. if you do happen to have a problem …then there is a dozen cures that are being withheld from mainstream doctors…first of all cannibis was used for breast tumors before they changed the name to evil marijuana and made it illegal. doctors were pissed they said dont take my cannibiniods (it also worked on collicky babies,but i also heard hanging them upsidedown by there feet will straigten the crooked spin which is a likely cause) … i just heard meditation reduces stress and is very good for the healing process. quit gobbling up fear and gmos and get strictly organic foods and just eat right. this is the age of enlightment not density…….dont do it!
power mongers create and perpetuate bad conditions and even symptoms
Not surprising, since OBGYN’s and pediatricians have been mutilating infant boys for a long time in the USA for no good reason. Now they’re going after women and girls. I wonder if the new fad is to have infant girls mutilated ‘for their own good’ and have mastectomies when they are days old? These fools will be surprised when they get cancer somewhere else in the bodies, won’t they….
People get sex changes all the time and no one complains. Abortions would draw less ire from society today. It’s just two boobs. And I doubt she will be more “popular” after the operation. What man would want a woman who cut her own boobs off? It reminds me of women who get raped and intentionally try to look ugly afterwards so that men will not find them attractive. It’s a defense mechanism. Maybe this is her defense mechanism. Maybe she is deathly afraid that she will die young from breast cancer, and she figures she’d rather live with no boobs than to die with a boob or two and be sick the whole time. But they are her boobs, and she is an adult, so I support her if she really feels strongly about it. Who knows maybe she will get two fake boobs so people don’t stare at her in public. Nancy Reagan had a fake one, and she was a well respected lady. How did the word “breast” become “boob?” Now there’s a story.