Evidence of infant-murder in the creation of the fetal cell line used for COVID vaccine testing

“‘Experiments were being performed on near-term alive aborted babies who were not even afforded the mercy of anesthetic as they writhed and cried in agony, and when their usefulness had expired, they were executed and discarded as garbage’.”

by Jon Rappoport

April 4, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

We begin here:

“To obtain embryo cells [for research on vaccines and other pharma products], embryos from spontaneous abortions cannot be used, nor can those obtained by means of abortions performed via the vagina: in both cases, the embryo will be contaminated by micro-organisms.”

“The correct way consists in having recourse to Caesarian section or to the removal of the uterus. Only in this way can bacteriological sterility be guaranteed.”

“In either case, then, to obtain embryo cells for culture a programmed abortion must be adopted, choosing the age of the embryo and dissecting it while still alive, in order to remove tissues to be placed in culture media.”

“Given these premises, we face the dilemma of whether the deliberate systematic destruction of a human creature to obtain cell material can be justified, when it is recognized that this is of great interest to fundamental research and for the diagnosis of some human diseases. Are research and diagnosis of such great value that they justify the destruction of human beings?”

“The Geneva Declaration affirms that the doctor has the duty to take the greatest care to safeguard the life of a human being from its conception and will not, even under threat, use his knowledge to infringe humanitarian laws.” (1986-04-26; Herranz, Gonzalo; Il Sabato, no.15…Professor Herranz was, at the time, president of the Committee of Medical Ethics of Spanish Doctors and vice-president of the Permanent Committee of Medical Ethics of the European Community.)”

What exactly happened in 1972 or 1973, in the Netherlands, where an infant girl was aborted, and her kidneys used to make a cell line that would be used, going forward, in the testing of vaccines?

That cell line is called HEK 293, and it has been used to test COVID vaccines.

I have already presented evidence for concluding the abortion involved removing the living infant from her mother’s womb, and taking her kidneys, which of course killed her.

This evidence rests on the realization that, in order to extract viable and useful kidney tissue, the baby had to have a functioning blood supply, which meant she was alive.

But the evidence ALSO comes from knowing many other abortions have been carried out, in order to harvest tissue for medical research, by murdering living babies.

I have found a very informative article (2/9/2021) at the Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform UK, by Christian Hacking, titled, “What the HEK?!” by Christian Hacking. Quoting from the article:

“HEK 293 is a human cell line created using a kidney from a dissected unborn baby in the Netherlands between 1972 and 1973. It is the second most common cell line and is used extensively in ‘pharmaceutical and biomedical research’. It is also used in vaccine creation and cancer research.”

“It was used, along with other human cell lines, to develop a genetically engineered spike protein (that the mRNA vaccine codes for) in the original development stage of the vaccine. The ‘new technology’ Pfizer vaccine and the Moderna Vaccine were tested on HEK 293 before they began human trials. This testing is ongoing for all new batches. Finally the ‘old technology’ Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine grew a weakened viral strain in HEK 293 cell culture…”

“The kidney in question was dissected from a healthy Dutch baby girl of unknown origin by the team at Leiden University in the Netherlands in 1972. Despite the inclusion of the term ‘embryonic’ in the title, the baby in question was probably 12-13 weeks old when she was killed so as to secure functioning kidney cells. The man in charge of the research was named Alex Jan Van der Eb; he is still alive and still based in Holland.”

“When questioned on the matter by the FDA in 2001, Dr Van der Eb confirmed it was an intentional abortion of a ‘fetus’ but gave hazy details of the exact experiments.”

“’So the kidney material, the fetal kidney material was as follows: the kidney of the fetus was, with an unknown family history, obtained in 1972 probably. The precise date is not known anymore. The fetus, as far as I can remember, was completely normal. Nothing was wrong. The reasons for the abortion were unknown to me. I probably knew it at that time, but it got lost, all this information’.”

Author Hacking continues: “…extracting and growing living cells is incredibly difficult. In order to give oneself the best chance of success you need to ensure the child is healthy, fresh, intact and sterile. As one embryologist and Emeritus Professor of Anatomy confirms:”

“’In order to sustain 95% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion. Within an hour the cells would continue to deteriorate, rendering the specimens useless’.”

[That statement was made by “Dr C Ward Kischer, embryologist and Emeritus Professor of Anatomy; specialist in Human Embryology, University of Arizona College of Medicine…”]

[My comment: This suggests the abortion, in the Netherlands, in 1972, was planned and technicians were standing by. I would say that, to ensure the viability of the tissue, the infant had a functioning blood supply and was alive when her kidneys were removed, killing her.]

Hacking: “In order for the organs to be at ‘optimal viability’, the child needs to be dissected and organs extracted within 5 minutes of delivery. Anaesthetic also cannot be used so as to not change the cellular activity of the organs the researcher wants to obtain.”

“Acclaimed Doctor, Ian Donald, the pioneer of the ultrasound scanner, also claims to have witnessed the WI-38 [another cell-line] dissections [1962], conducted at the Karolinska Institute; he described them such:

“’Experiments were being performed on near-term alive aborted babies who were not even afforded the mercy of anesthetic as they writhed and cried in agony, and when their usefulness had expired, they were executed and discarded as garbage’.”

“In his dense book ‘The Foetus As Transplant Donor the Scientific, Social, and Ethical Perspectives’, immunologist Dr Peter McCullagh relays detailed descriptions of the methods used on dozens of ‘fetal tissue donors’ from the 1970’s onward, including the deaths of babies between 7 and 26 weeks gestation by decapitations, exposure, dissection and drug testing. Gynaecologist and ex-abortionist Dr Bernard Nathanson, relaying his own understanding of abortion, and citing McCullagh’s book claims the Swedish experiments took place thus:

“’…in Sweden they have been puncturing the sac of a pregnant woman at let us say 14 to 16 weeks, and then they put a clamp on the head of the baby, pull the head down into the neck of the womb, drill a hole into the baby’s head, and then put a suction machine into the brain and suck out the brain cells….. Healthy human fetuses from 7 to 21 weeks from legal abortions were used. This is in Sweden. The conception age was estimated from crown rump length and so on. Fetal liver and kidney were rapidly removed and weighed. Now at 21 weeks, what they were doing, or 18 weeks, or 16 weeks, was what is called prostaglandin abortions. They would inject a substance into the womb. The woman would then go into mini-labor and pass this baby. 50% of the time, the baby would be born alive, but that didn’t stop them. They would just simply open up the abdomen of the baby with no anesthesia, and take out the liver and kidneys, etc.’”

“A research paper from the University of Toronto from June 1952 commenting on the method of their experiments suggests that these techniques were universal with researchers working in close proximity to the abortions.”

“’No macerated [softened after death] specimens were used and in many of the embryos the heart was still beating at the time of receipt in the virus laboratory.”

“According to Gonzalo Herranz, former head of the Committee of Medical Ethics of Spanish doctors, the best way to prevent ‘contamination by microorganisms’ is to deliver the child by caesarean section or the removal of the uterus.”

“A 1982 review of a history of tissue donation affirms this, and much of the above evidence:”

“’Fetal tissue for transplantation must be “harvested” within a few minutes of delivery. Ideally this is by hysterectomy, with the fetus delivered in utero. Drugs which reduce fetal physiological activity need to be avoided. The fetus is therefore in as alive and aware a state as possible when being opened’.”

From Hacking’s article, it’s quite clear how the standard procedure of infant-murder is carried out.

It’s entirely reasonable to assume fetal cell line HEK 293—used for COVID vaccine testing—was originally produced, in 1972, by the murder of an infant. Refusal to take a COVID vaccine on the basis of conscience and religion is more than justified.

Given the weight of the circumstantial case, I would say that for all people of faith, refusal is essential.

Lunatic medical murderers and their allies will say anything to avoid blame and the application of true justice to themselves. They will invent “science” at the drop of a hat and couch it in humanitarian terms. They will claim the ends justify the means. They will commit gross forgery to pretend those ends are vital.

But we don’t have to stand by and passively believe them.

Billions of people of faith can stand against them.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

28 comments on “Evidence of infant-murder in the creation of the fetal cell line used for COVID vaccine testing

  1. Opie Poik says:

    “Examples must be made of parents who allow their kids to be poisoned with mRNA injections”:

    https://thecovidblog.com/2022/04/04/examples-must-be-made-of-parents-who-allow-their-kids-to-be-poisoned-with-mrna-injections/

    ~~~

    “A Twitter Mob Is A Religious Experience”

    (Or, taking the wafer of the body of The Science, at the Church of the Exalted Fact-Checker):

    1. The beginning state of this religious experience was fear. The social media algorithms ramped it up, of course (maximizing “engagement”), creating large groups of very frightened people.

    2. Because there is no God in this process to confer righteousness, righteousness had to be manufactured, by creating Satan figures to oppose. (Opposition to pure evil = righteousness.) That role fell to those who resisted wearing masks, then passed to the unvaxxed.

    3. Next came the reason to believe, and for the social media mob, it was behavioral, rising to the level of chemical. The confirmation of others has been a factor in all sorts of group experiences, but it was taken to a new level by the Facebook and Twitter algos (and the bots pushing those algos). Likes, shares and thumbs up are little shots of dopamine; they are addictive and they are powerful. This provided a more than sufficient reason to believe.

    4. In the end, reviling the non-compliant conferred righteousness upon the mob.

    READ REST:

    https://freemansperspective.com/a-twitter-mob-is-a-religious-experience/

  2. Sanjoy Mahajan says:

    An earlier version of this article helped me realize that I would refuse the Covid jabs (and now all jabs) even at gunpoint.

  3. Donna Ruth says:

    Thank you, Jon. So valuable.

    How many thousands or hundreds of thousands (millions?) of religious exemption documents offered this argument? I know I cobbled together one that was well used, each having it signed by their parish priest. It was accepted by one employer and scoffed at by the legal departments of other employers. Such was the evil that one young father of three, devoutly Catholic, was terminated despite two attempts with religious exemption documents. He was an IT Specialist who had worked from home for years. Nowhere near his place of employment. Lost his job, pension, benefits and with no recourse to EI.

    It was pure evil that spawned these reactions, and large part of that evil commenced 50 years ago in a lab in the Netherlands. Lord have mercy on us.

    • Barbara says:

      I agree , my heart is so heavy with sadness as I have family members that have taken these bio weapons and ignored the lives tortured murderously to provide them to them . Unconscionable. We must stand against this now and from this day forward spread the truth . Thank you Jon for all that you do to spread the truth .

  4. Mazara says:

    Horrendous,the people who do this have no empathy they are psychopaths

  5. john-oranje says:

    Even if all vaccines were safe and effective in preventing
    disease it would not justify these murders.

    It was quite hard to read all those descriptions of
    ‘procedures’.

    The truth is that vaccines have never been about preventing
    disease but they are for profit and covering up the real
    causes of most diseases; namely poison, malnutrition and
    pollution.

    The products of these murders are probably used for all
    kinds of research into genetics and bio-weapons etc;
    after all it hardly matters what they put into the injections.

    They don’t have to work and no one is liable
    for the damage caused.

  6. Ed says:

    OH these truths must be spread far and wide. The Monsters in white coats need to be photographed with there names and Institutions they worked for. Pamphlets Social media Billboards every possible way to expose what they have done and are still doing. The word Has not been invented yet to describe these Creatures. Pope Franky is okay with it though

    • Barbara says:

      I have left the Catholic religion because of this issue and others. How can this opinion from this Pope make any sense to any of the followers of the Catholic faith ?

  7. Sue says:

    Evil is evil; cruelty and suffering are the same no matter what kind of sentient beings we choose as our victims.

    By supporting or justifying torture in any arena, we are condoning all of it, as it really DOES come back around to bite us on our selfish butts. That is why the following quote is so absolutely true:

    “Until he extends the circle of his compassion to all living things, man will not himself know peace.” – Dr. Albert Schweitzer

    • Opie Poik says:

      Ergo, neighborhood cats should be tried for premeditated murder for vivisecting rabbits for dinner. Mother Nature is Medea.

      Insights into plant consciousness from neuroscience, physics and mathematics: A role for quasicrystals?
      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489624/
      Abstract:
      “There is considerable debate over whether plants are conscious and this, indeed, is an important question. Here I look at developments in neuroscience, physics and mathematics that may impact on this question. Two major concomitants of consciousness in animals are microtubule function and electrical gamma wave synchrony. Both these factors may also play a role in plant consciousness. I show that plants possess aperiodic quasicrystal structures composed of ribosomes that may enable quantum computing, which has been suggested to lie at the core of animal consciousness.”

      The universe consumes itself; the Earth eats shit and shits wheat. And, no, I’m not for vivisection of human infants for research, nor boiling alive of stolen pet dogs for dinner, nor of prisoners of the religion of pieces.

      • Reset gal says:

        Opie Poik says:

        “Ergo, neighborhood cats should be tried for premeditated murder for vivisecting rabbits for dinner. Mother Nature is Medea.”

        …except one detail.

        I am not aware of any animal doing premeditated killing of another in exchange for shiny Lamborghini, as Planned Parenthood of California and Pfizer do.

      • Sue says:

        Sadly, there are many people who, like you, claim all the privileges but want none of the responsibility of being “human.” We are either spiritual beings or we are just top predators. The two are mutually exclusive.

        My observation is that no creature being wants to be tortured to death, and if I am what a human is supposed to be, my purpose then is to protect and care for all life, not to torment, terrify, dismember.

        On the subject of vivisection, it has been known from the beginning, by those who have a higher level of understanding, that there is not only NO benefit gleaned from it, but the exact opposite is true. Vivisection of other animals always leads to vivisection of “our own kind,” and has wrought disaster in the “health” industry.

        VIVISECTION OR SCIENCE: A CHOICE TO MAKE
        http://www.pnc.com.au/~cafmr/online/research/croce1.html

        “The spiritual malady that rages in the soul of the vivisector is in itself sufficient to render him incapable of acquiring the highest and best knowledge. He finds it easier to propagate and multiply disease than to discover the secret of health. Seeking for the germs of life, he invents only new methods of death.”
        – Anna Kingsford, MD

        our-compass.org/…/4-reasons-why-the-plant-sentience-argument-doesnt- work/

    • Barbara says:

      Thank you for this reminder.

  8. marlene says:

    The destruction of aborted babies, including those aborted live, never, ever justify the “means!”  Further, I have reliable reason to believe that a large percentage of these babies & their body parts are being sold to those with lots of money for the purpose of what they seem to have reason to believe, enhances their beauty & extends their lives. In fact, since older “aborted” live baby organs are more valuable to them, it’s the reason for the bill in some states to allow children AFTER birth to be destroyed up to several months old.  These sacrifices to Moloch are made by the most evil of men & women.

  9. Dove says:

    Jon you wrote:

    “My comment: This suggests the abortion, in the Netherlands, in 1972, was planned and technicians were standing by. I would say that, to ensure the viability of the tissue, the infant had a functioning blood supply and was alive when her kidneys were removed, killing her.”

    There is still missing part of a mother, also with no anesthesia. How did they remove sack at precise time? Was she just waiting and observing psychopaths butchering her and then quartering baby and then dumping into trash bin the unwanted remains? Did they escort her to recovery room?

    Looks to me that they had well functioning system of “procurement” of mothers and baby kidneys “harvesting” in place by 293rd attempt in 1972. No “recovery” of mother is apparent.

    Mengele had to just select and his employer (BAYER AG) sent invoice with check to SS for 90 DM apiece. Pfizer system must be whole different game, just as far as logistics are concerned.

    California Planed Parenthood tapes released by Project Veritas prove that fetal parts system evolved and continues half a century later.

    Kidney removal is not all that Pfizer is hiding from us. Whole truth, IMO, is even more horrific.

  10. Audrey says:

    I had to stop reading halfway through. I don’t know if the tears came from anger or sadness. Probably both. As I continued to read the detailed descriptions, which as hard as they were to read, NEED to be described in these details, so every person can visualize the horrific reality of what greed looks like. If these gruesome acts were done by a cult and the story was blasted all over MSM, the public would not stand for these atrocities. There would be a manhunt and the leader of the cult and his followers would be hunted down and locked up. The public would be outraged because we all know if anything captures one’s attention, it is someone physically abusing/ harming children. BUT somehow these atrocious acts done by people in white lab coats with letters behind their names are dismissed or excused because they are doing it for humanity and for the health of the world. It’s sick.

    Then there is also the subject/argument no matter what side one is on regarding abortion or vaccines. Every person has the right to know how these vaccines or medications are made and WHAT is in them in order to make an INFORMED decision. I’d like to believe if these detailed barbaric atrocities were disclosed to the public, the majority of the public would have refused these jabs, right? Or am I being native?

    Thank you Jon. No matter how difficult this was to read, it has to be revealed/known. Last year, I remember listening to a female Dr (don’t remember her name) being interviewed by RFKjr. where she described some of these atrocities. Reading your article, however, gave me a true visual/image of what greed and evil look like. AND for those arrogant people accusing those of us who chose not to take the jab as being selfish and not humanitarians, what say you now?

  11. Roundball Shaman says:

    Absolutely no regard for the value of human life appears to be the price of entry into The Great Regret Reset for demented elitists.

    Our health and very lives are being attacked on various fronts of attack. And ‘They’ justify this by virtue of their self-deluded sense of entitlement and superiority. They believe Themselves to be humanity’s best. In truth, They are its worst.

    Being led by Predatory Vultures with souls devoid of virtue right into to the bowels of Hell by those who’ve given Themselves over to the darkest and bleakest corners of the human mind and experience.

    ‘They’ have no regard for human lives who have come to full term. It’s no surprise that They also have no value for human lives who haven’t even had a chance to live yet. And in truth, They don’t truly value Their own lives either. They think They do, but that’s just another massive delusion.

    ‘By Their fruits you shall know Them…’

    And by their very rot and stench of death… yes sadly, We know Them all too well.

  12. AnnaMaria Cardinalli says:

    Jon, I can not thank you enough for continuing in the effort to make this horror known. It is not for the long-past victims alone that we fight but for those of the future. God bless you and your work!

  13. Jim S. Smith says:

    In profitable “science”, there is no such thing as “conscience”. All attachments to the “sanctity of Life” are non-existent.

    THAT is who believes in ruling over you.

    Life is a fleeting moment, in the grandness of the Universe. These psychopathic pseudo-scientists care not about Life, when it comes to their next big “discovery”.

    THEY are your enemy!

    THEY are legion!

    THEY will not be forgiven!

    – Jim S.

  14. Liv4ever says:

    Great article…! Thanks for keeping the pressure on.

    It has a lot of connection to the organ donor/ organ harvesting industry. Most don’t realize that an organ is only viable if it is taken from a living breathing donor. This opens up all kinds of questio, moral and ethical. How easy would it be to push the boundaries if say a hospital is under pressure to produce for a wealthy client?

    I used to be naive in this regard and checked the box on my drivers license that allows this. But since I became more educated on what this practice entails, I no longer permit my organs to be a commodity.

  15. Sean says:

    No easier to read this time as the first time you reported this unbelievable medical murderous crime.

  16. Walter Sitzwohl says:

    Jon mentions the “Leiden University” in the Netherlands. The term “Leiden” can be translated into pain, suffering, malady and the like.

    Nomen est Omen.

    God help us.

    Greetings from Austria

  17. LN says:

    This is so dreadful, I don’t know whether God will forgive us fro having let it happen to the beings least able to protect themselves. IT is important to realise that this harvesting from live bodies only also applies to organs harvested for transplant. Anyone “waiting for a kidney” or whatever, is waiting for the removal of that organ from a living body.

    The invention of “Brain Death” has enabled this gruesome market to arise. Life-support protocol enables the procedure to take place.

Leave a Reply to AnnaMaria Cardinalli Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *