Trump in danger—the test, the experimental drugs

Trump tests positive on the most unreliable diagnostic test ever devised; taking experimental drugs

PHONY TEST, DANGEROUS DRUGS

by Jon Rappoport

October 3, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

UPDATE 1: Trump flown to Walter Reed Hospital. Watch out for toxic antiviral drugs; e.g, remdesivir. And ventilators (lethal). This is a field day for Biden, and also for promoters of the pandemic and all the regulations. For example—“everyone must get tested.” Trump is made into the poster boy for COVID-19 propaganda. “The PRESIDENT has it.” No matter what happens to Trump, this is another step in the ongoing coup.

UPDATE 2: CNN reports— “Trump had a fever Friday, a source said. He has received the unapproved experimental Regeneron treatment as well as the drug remdesivir, according to the President’s physician.” NOT GOOD NEWS.

Regeneron is an experimental antibody cocktail. Typically, when the news reports use of these drugs, no mention is made of negative effects or toxicity.

The Daily Mail reports: “[In an ongoing clinical trial of Regeneron] Two patients who got the antibody cocktail drug had side effects. One of them was ‘serious,’ though it’s not clear what exactly happened to that person.”

In tests of antibody drugs, serious problems have occurred. These are characterized as “increased infection.”

Drugs.com discusses remdesivir: “[the drug] has not been approved to treat coronavirus or COVID-19. It is not yet known if remdesivir is an effective treatment for any condition. The FDA has authorized emergency use of remdesivir only in people with COVID-19 who are in a hospital. You must remain under the care of a doctor while receiving remdesivir.”

Adverse effects, according to Drugs.com: “Get emergency medical help if you have signs of an allergic reaction: hives; difficult breathing; swelling of your face, lips, tongue, or throat…”

More adverse effects: “…chills, nausea, vomiting…increased sweating…a light-headed feeling, like you might pass out…abnormal liver function tests…anemia or decreased hemoglobin concentrations…acute kidney injury…”

And then we have this: “[remdesivir] is being investigated for and is currently available under an FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) for the treatment of severe COVID-19 in hospitalized patients.”

Trump doesn’t have “severe COVID-19.” So why is he being given remdesivir at all—especially given all the adverse effects of the drug?

Plus: NO ONE HAS EVER STUDIED THE EFFECTS OF COMBINING REGENERON AND REMDESIVIR—THE TWO DRUGS TRUMP IS TAKING. The doctors are playing god with the president’s life.

And now we come to the diagnostic test—Big question: how many cycles was Trump’s COVID test set for? I’ll explain.

Each cycle of the PCR test is a quantum leap in magnification of the test sample Trump provided. As every PCR tech knows, different labs use a different number of cycles when they perform the test. There is no uniform standard.

That is a giant scandal, because when you do the test using more than, say, 30 cycles, all sorts of irrelevant and inconsequential material shows up that can be counted as “positive for the coronavirus”—when that is NOT the case.

This is exactly what is happening all over the world every day. Too many cycles; absurd and wrong diagnosis.

Could Trump’s COVID test have been rigged in this fashion? It’s as easy as pie. Just increase the number of cycles. Doesn’t matter how many times the test was repeated for “confirmation.” It’ll read positive if there are too many cycles. Of course, no one will admit that Trump’s test was set for 40 cycles, if it was.

And guess what? The “cycle problem” is just one of many fatal flaws in the PCR test. I’ve covered this subject many times. Here it is again:


COVID diagnostic test: worst test ever devised?

The need for the COVID test is being hyped to the skies. More tests automatically create more case numbers. This allows heads of state and national governments to whipsaw the public:

“We were re-opening the economy, but now, with the escalating case numbers, we’ll have to impose lockdowns again…”

This wreaks more havoc and economic destruction, which is the true goal of the COVID operation. Its cruelty is boundless.

In this article, I present quotes from official sources about their own diagnostic test for the coronavirus, the PCR.

Spoiler alert: the admitted holes and shortcomings of the test are devastating.

From “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” [1]:

“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”

Translation: A positive test doesn’t guarantee that the COVID virus is causing infection at all. And, ahem, reading between the lines, maybe the COVID virus might not be in the patient’s body at all, either.

From the World Health Organization (WHO): “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans” [2]:

“Several assays that detect the 2019-nCoV have been and are currently under development, both in-house and commercially. Some assays may detect only the novel virus [COVID] and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are genetically similar.”

Translation: Some PCR tests register positive for types of coronavirus that have nothing to do with COVID—including plain old coronas that cause nothing more than a cold.

The WHO document adds this little piece: “Protocol use limitations: Optional clinical specimens for testing has [have] not yet been validated.”

Translation: We’re not sure which tissue samples to take from the patient, in order for the test to have any validity.

From the FDA: “LabCorp COVID-19RT-PCR test EUA Summary: ACCELERATED EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) SUMMARYCOVID-19 RT-PCR TEST (LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA)” [3]:

“…The SARS-CoV-2RNA [COVID virus] is generally detectable in respiratory specimens during the acute phase of infection. Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status…THE AGENT DETECTED MAY NOT BE THE DEFINITE CAUSE OF DISEASE (CAPS are mine). Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”

Translation: On the one hand, we claim the test can “generally” detect the presence of the COVID virus in a patient. But we admit that “the agent detected” on the test, by which we mean COVID virus, “may not be the definite cause of disease.” We also admit that, unless the patient has an acute infection, we can’t find COVID. Therefore, the idea of “asymptomatic patients” confirmed by the test is nonsense. And even though a positive test for COVID may not indicate the actual cause of disease, all positive tests must be reported—and they will be counted as “COVID cases.” Regardless.

From a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, “SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit” [4]:

“Regulatory status: For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.”

Translation: Don’t use the test result alone to diagnose infection or disease. Oops.

“non-specific interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3, type 7), Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia Pneumoniae, etc.”

Translation: Although this company states the test can detect COVID, it also states the test can read FALSELY positive if the patient has one of a number of other irrelevant viruses in his body. What is the test proving, then? Who knows? Flip a coin.

“Application Qualitative”

Translation: This clearly means the test is not suited to detect how much virus is in the patient’s body. I’ll cover how important this admission is in a minute.

“The detection result of this product is only for clinical reference, and it should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The clinical management of patients should be considered in combination with their symptoms/signs, history, other laboratory tests and treatment responses. The detection results should not be directly used as the evidence for clinical diagnosis, and are only for the reference of clinicians.”

Translation: Don’t use the test as the exclusive basis for diagnosing a person with COVID. And yet, this is exactly what health authorities are doing all over the world. All positive tests must be reported to government agencies, and they are counted as COVID cases.

Those quotes, from official government and testing sources, torpedo the whole “scientific” basis of the test.

And now, I’ll add another lethal blow: the test has never been validated properly as an instrument to detect disease. Even if we blindly assumed it can detect the presence of the COVID virus in a patient, it doesn’t show HOW MUCH virus is in the body. And that is key, because in order to even begin talking about actual illness in the real world, not in a lab, the patient would need to have millions and millions of the virus actively replicating in his body.

Proponents of the test assert that it CAN measure how much virus is in the body. To which I reply: prove it.

Prove it in a way it should have been proved decades ago—but never was.

Take five hundred people and remove tissue samples from them. The people who take the samples do NOT do the test. The testers will never know who the patients are and what condition they’re in.

The testers run their PCR on the tissue samples. In each case, they say which virus they found and HOW MUCH of it they found.

“All right, in patients 24, 46, 65, 76, 87, and 93 we found a great deal of virus.”

Now we un-blind those patients. They should all be sick, because they have so much virus replicating in their bodies. Are they sick? Are they running marathons? Let’s find out.

This OBVIOUS vetting of the test has never been done. That is an enormous scandal. Where are the controlled test results in 500 patients, a thousand patients? Nowhere.

The PCR is an unproven fraud.

“But…but…what about all the sick and dying people…why are they sick?”

I’ve written thousands of words answering that question, in past articles. A NUMBER of conditions—none involving COVID, and most involving old traditional diseases—are making people sick.

There are other large-scale studies of the PCR test that have never been done. I’ve covered them in detail, in prior articles. To summarize: a study using a thousand patients, in which their tissue samples are sent to 30 different labs for analysis and verdicts, to see whether the results are uniform from lab to lab; and a study of 1000 patients, in which the results are compared with the results of analysis by electron microcopy. These large studies—never done.

In other words, the PCR test has never been adequately tested; it has never been properly validated as a diagnostic tool.

Here, from Canadian researcher David Crowe’s bombshell paper, FLAWS IN CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC THEORY, is a key quote about the PCR test [5]:

“A review of 33 RT-PCR tests for COVID-19 approved under US FDA Emergency Use Authorizations showed a wide range of differences in what the tests were looking for and how they decided whether they had found it. The tests look for a variety of different segments (‘genes’) of the presumed COVID-19 genome, that only amounts to about 1% or less of the total genome, which is about 30,000 bases. Perhaps the worst feature of the tests is how they decide whether the sample is positive if more than one [‘gene’] segment is being looked for. Some tests look for only one, so it must be present for a positive. But tests that look for two segments are split between those that require both to be present and those that require either one for a positive. Some tests look for three segments but only require any two to be present, while one test insisted on all three. Tests that allow a segment to be undetected raise the question of how it can be said that a virus was detected when an important part of it was missing.”

If the PCR is a uniform standardized test, a rabbit is a spaceship.

Speaking of lack of uniformity in test results, here is a quote from Stephen Bustin, who is considered one of the foremost experts on PCR in the world. The excerpt is from his 2017 article, “Talking the talk, but not walking the walk: RT-qPCR as a paradigm for the lack of reproducibility in molecular research” [6]:

“Awareness of variability problems associated with PCR has been long-standing, with the first report describing inconsistencies with replicate and serial specimens evaluated within and between laboratories as early as 1992. The lack of a theoretical understanding of the dynamic processes involved in PCR, especially with respect to the amplification of nonreproducible and/or unexpected amplification products, was also highlighted decades ago. These observations and the resulting implications are largely disregarded.”

Here is the story of an epic failure of the PCR, right out in the open, for all to see. The reference is the NY Times, January 22, 2007, “Faith in Quick Tests Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.” [7]

“Dr. Brooke Herndon, an internist at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, could not stop coughing…By late April, other health care workers at the hospital were coughing…”

“For months, nearly everyone involved thought the medical center had had a huge whooping cough outbreak, with extensive ramifications. Nearly 1,000 health care workers at the hospital in Lebanon, N.H., were given a preliminary test and furloughed from work until their results were in; 142 people, including Dr. Herndon, were told they appeared to have the disease; and thousands were given antibiotics and a vaccine for protection. Hospital beds were taken out of commission, including some in intensive care.”

“Then, about eight months later, health care workers were dumbfounded to receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm.”

“Now, as they look back on the episode, epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists say the problem was that they placed too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test [PCR] that led them astray.”

“There are no national data on pseudo-epidemics caused by an overreliance on such molecular tests, said Dr. Trish M. Perl, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins and past president of the Society of Health Care Epidemiologists of America. But, she said, pseudo-epidemics happen all the time. The Dartmouth case may have been one of the largest, but it was by no means an exception, she said.”

“Many of the new molecular [PCR] tests are quick but technically demanding, and each laboratory may do them in its own way. These tests, called ‘home brews,’ are not commercially available, and there are no good estimates of their error rates. But their very sensitivity makes false positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested, as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.”

“’You’re in a little bit of no man’s land,’ with the new molecular [PCR] tests, said Dr. Mark Perkins, an infectious disease specialist and chief scientific officer at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, a nonprofit foundation supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. ‘All bets are off on exact performance’.”

“With pertussis, she [Dr. Kretsinger, CDC] said, ‘there are probably 100 different P.C.R. protocols and methods being used throughout the country,’ and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate. ‘We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of P.C.R.-positive results, the disease was not pertussis,’ Dr. Kretsinger added.”

“Dr. Cathy A. Petti, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Utah, said the story had one clear lesson.”

“’The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives,’ Dr. Petti said. ‘No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R’.”

There is more to report about the PCR test, and I have, but I’ll make this final point for now: I’ve presented, over the last several months, compelling evidence that no one proved the existence of the COVID virus, by proper scientific procedures, in the first place. So the PCR test would be looking for…what? A virus that isn’t there?

And on the back of this test, governments are wrecking economies all over the world, and untold numbers of human lives.


SOURCES:

[1] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

[2] https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/laboratory-guidance

[3] https://www.fda.gov/media/136151/download

[4] https://www.creative-diagnostics.com/sars-cov-2-coronavirus-multiplex-rt-qpcr-kit-277854-457.htm

[5] https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf

[6] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/eci.12801

[7] nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

38 comments on “Trump in danger—the test, the experimental drugs

  1. Fuzzy says:

    Alarm bells rang for me as soon as I heard he was taking Fauci’s worthless drug and now this experimental treatment.

    Wouldn’t be surprised if they purposely kill Trump with these toxic cocktails and then use his death to REALLY accelerate the draconian measures.

    Very dangerous times we’re entering. We have to all unite and push back against this while we still have time

  2. Hélios says:

    Dear Jon,

    There was a discussion last night during a live video about “Trump’s testing positive”. And everybody agreed there is no danger for Trump.

    I’m very sure Trump is aware of this whole scam, ghost virus, improper PCR testing, so he would take advantage of the situation, either to appear weaker to democrats or just to rest a little. So I would be surprised if he accepts to take any drug.

    Hopefully I’m right…

  3. Marilyn says:

    I rarely believe anything the media report. Apparently Trump has been tested positive for mild Covid-19. I wonder if despite what has been published, that he has not been given Remdesivir or Regeneron. — however, when he suddenly makes a grand recovery, the two drugs will now be declared safe and effective???? And, could this be used to confirm to those in fear that Covid-19 actually exists??? There are too many people trying to work too many scams for me to swallow anything that comes from the media. Thank you Jon for your sane blog.

    • M says:

      yes, that’s what I also think. Shame on Trump for playing this game, the vaccine game, the China virus, for maintaining the fear in the “deplorables”

    • gavin says:

      yes it seems that way- why didnt he take HCQ and make that the hero? its almost like this is a deliberate attempt to placate the pharma mob. I dont believe he is ill, prob didnt even test positive- even if he did it doesnt mean anything.

  4. Haniel Adhar says:

    I said this before and I will say it again: this “virus” was created as a means of assassinating Trump.

    The virus doesn’t exist, but the treatment is, and everyone that has died from “COVID” has been treated for it. No one seems to want to discuss that part in the media…

    So, get ready for a war. This is exactly what they were planning the whole time, and the virus itself was not what they were going to use. The treatment is the murder weapon.

    • TS says:

      I wonder then what people actually become sick from, then. I have several, actually dozens, of co-workers who have been sick. Far more than would ordinarily be in an ordinary year. One had a cough with which he had a difficult time in shaking.

      • Haniel Adhar says:

        That has happened to a billion people a billion times since the dawn of time.

        There are lots of reasons for this, but in the end, the bottom line is that there isn’t any “new” virus causing a “new” disease.

      • Rod Frost says:

        In November last year I had a cough that I had a difficult time shaking. After three weeks I started taking large amounts of vitamin C and slowly got better. I live in regional Australia.

  5. ReluctantWarrior says:

    This is the coup, full blown, in progress.My question is why is Trump allowing him to be treated with these drugs. He knows better. Very odd. I don’t think this is going to go well for him.

  6. Piksil says:

    Jon:

    Do we know that the prez is actually receiving ‘treatment’? This could be another act in the play. (Something the TIP [Transition Integrity Project] didn’t plan for in their 4 scenarios of presidential election outcomes and how to get Trump out.) This could be simply to make the (s)election all about ‘Covid’, and forget about the crashing economy, social unrest, enslavement, global warming (shows my age calling it ‘global warming, eh?),AI, 5G, etc etc.

    That being posed, I wholeheartedly agree that mixing drug therapies would be a crap shoot. Heck, even those treatments mentioned being used alone would be a crap shoot.

    PCR not to be used for diagnosis. But it is, despite the examples you’ve pointed out as reasons that it is totally unreliable, and NOT STANDARDIZED!!! How many pieces of paper are on that table? How many white blood cells are in this milliliter of blood? Those testing measures and results can be standardized.

    An interesting sidebar for those who still believe viruses cause dis-ease, and kneel at the alter of vaccines: Dr Jack Kruse mentioned that fragments of SARS nucleic acid sequences have been in US ‘flu vaccines’ since 2013.

  7. I read an article claiming that 3 journalist despite wearing mask nevertheless tested positive. This ought to underline that wearing a mask isn’t going to protect you. I am about the same age as President Trump and do not wear a mask. MY wife is a bit older and a heart patients, etc, and doesn’t wear a mask. This as I view is that we are actually safer not to wear a mask. OK, we neither have any so called “life saving vaccinations” against the flu. As we belief our bodies are better off without it. While we reside in Australia we both adore President Donald Trump. After all the man seems to have a Teflon skin as everything they have thrown at him just doesn’t stick. I look forwards to the next 4 years of showing his adversaries that they just wasted their time to target him.

  8. Paul says:

    “Trump is made into the poster boy for COVID-19 propaganda.”

    “You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

    Rahm Emanuel

  9. After reading my Cathy O’Brien again I think this is all fear programming. It’s too easy to jump in there and say things like “this will be the assassination of the president”. I’ve made the mistake too many times before of believing an attack on Trump is going to be his end …

    https://trance-formation.com/the-great-unmasking/

    https://trance-formation.com/silenced-majority/

  10. Kat says:

    I don’t believe he tested positive at all. I think that there has been a very credible threat on his life and this is his way of ‘disappearing for a while’, as he stated he would do a month or so ago. Here is a very interesting video by Dave Hodges, citing similarities between this development and the days right before JFK’s murder. https://youtu.be/pPeFlSDpEd0

  11. Mr. J says:

    How can trump have a disease that does not exist? trump has a typical Fall flu. People do die from the flu so he could croak. He is old, fat and has high blood pressure.

  12. paul says:

    I doubt very much that Trump is taking these drugs. However, if he miraculously gets well and the claim is made that these experimental drugs were his saving grace, think what that would mean. Given that there is such resistance to Covid vaccines, could these new drugs be used instead – possibly as a backhanded way of administering vaccine ingredients? It was never about a flu, was it? It’s about injecting something into the world’s population.

  13. Larry C says:

    ““’You’re in a little bit of no man’s land,’ with the new molecular [PCR] tests, said Dr. Mark Perkins, an infectious disease specialist and chief scientific officer at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, a nonprofit foundation supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. ‘All bets are off on exact performance’.””

    With the exception of one tiny detail: It is a certainty, that the endless lock-downs that began with the arrival of the putative COVID-19 virus, are CRUSHING THE ECONOMY of our nation…and that the deadly outcome of this mindless (?) destruction will dwarf the COVID fatalities by ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE.

  14. William H Warrick III MD says:

    Remdesivir was used in the first US patient in January in Evergreen Washington. He got it on the 6th or 7th day and went home 4 days later. Currently it is used on very sick patients either in the ICU or on the verge of going there so it may have caused more problems given late.

  15. sam quentin says:

    Trump is a shill.

    Trump is in no danger….
    The country IS.

    “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains. One man thinks himself the master of others, but remains more of a slave than they are.”

    These are words of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 18th century Genevan philosopher, writer and composer, in his book The Social Contract.
    A book that serves as a cornerstone in modern political and social thought, especially the representative democracy sought by the Founders of the U.S.

    Rousseau realized that national “leaders” are NOT sovereigns.
    Even King George III of Britain came under the influence of the wealthiest Elite.

    John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, in their 18th century essays Cato’s Letters, realized this as well.

    Large corporations, controlled by those Elite, like the South Sea Co, the Dutch East India Co, and others, controlled the government, as thus British life & society.

    Healthcare represents OVER 17.7% of total U.S. GDP, at OVER $3.6 trillion spent in 2018.
    ONE single industry, responsible for over 1/6 of the entire U.S. GDP.
    OVER $329 billion was spent on pharmaceuticals in 2017.

    The U.S. medical industry is controlled by those corporations that are controlled by those Elite.

    Companies like GE Healthcare (maker of high-end medical equipment, and financer of other companies in the medical industry).
    Johnson & Johnson.
    UnitedHealth Group.
    CVS Health.
    Among others.

    What most of these companies have in common are their largest, controlling shareholders.
    Typically the largest investment banks, those that are controlled by the Elite.

    The original Medicare Act, which was purportedly designed to reform an out-of-control healthcare system, quickly became corrupted by that same broken system.

    Ditto for the ACA, which has become an even great boon for the elite, whom have corrupted, and are taking even greater advantage of that broken industry.

    The medical industry, via special interest legislation & Executive Orders, has become on
    of the main ways to divert more wealth to the Elite at the top.

    It is one of the many heads of the Hydra that has become the U.S. corporatocracy.

    ANY “leader” that doesn’t bow to this powerful industry, becoming a mere shill of that Elite, will be replaced.

    ANY of you that believe that Trump is an “outsider”, looking to fight the Elite, are complete fools.

    Trump is a bona fide company man.

    P.S. – I find it interesting when supposed “alt-media” outlets, those constantly criticizing the mainstream media (and rightly so), simultaneously also rely on that mainstream media for info., like this Trump narrative.

    Someone, anyone, PLEASE show me a “covid-19” test.
    Not a coronavirus antibody test, but a “covid-19” test.

    The very fact that Trump claims he “tested” positive for “covid-19” demonstrates what a complete moron he really is.

    Trump is the perfect fool.
    He is helping finalize the march towards total corporatocratic designed socialism.

    Now who you mere followers gonna let lead you?

    • Thomas Milton says:

      The jury is still out. By claiming that he “has” it, Trump can hijack the narrative. Since we know its fake, he does too. He can report feeling bad, or well, using this or that therapy, and recovering quickly. As a “victim”, he can speak with authority. Have an epiphany. Throw big med and the lockdowners under the bus. It’s a chance to see who he really is. Know this: his people don’t buy the scamdemic, and I doubt he will try to sell it to them. I’m hoping this is a way to call it off.

    • mdskeptic says:

      Yes, Spot on. If he were a real leader he’d have said no thanks Walter Reade, no thanks Bethesda Naval, me and Melania will tough it out with tea, honey and lemon at our Pennsylvania Avenue redoubt then we’re gonna take some sun down at Mara Lago. Nope, he’s captured. It’s all on us now.

  16. Truth1 says:

    Trump knows the truth, even as all politicians do. this is all just a fake show. who knows where they are going with all this. The Circus, maybe.

  17. Nick from Newtown says:

    1. Hydroxychloriquine beat Remdesivir side by side.

    Interestingly, hydroxychloriquine is the synthetic version of Quinine. If you’re into old tv shows, Dr.Quinn Medicine woman used Quinine to heal lots of ailments. She learned its benefits from Native American Indians.

    2. Gilead, Remdesivir’s mfr, is just another freemason club member. Freemasons pledge to help each other. California office smack on the 33rd parallel. Thats how they worship.

    Gilead Sciences Inc
    4049 Avenida De La Plata, Oceanside, CA 92056
    https://maps.app.goo.gl/xGL8XmE1NkXFNdWx5

  18. Thomas Milton says:

    Growing up my father used to use the phrase “you’re blowing smoke up my ass”. We laughed as kids occasinally pondering how, exactly, such a thing would be achieved. Many years later a friend emailed me an article detailing a Nineteenth century medical “treatment” called the “tobacco enema”. A bellows with a censer cannister and speculum. The treatment was given to women, for “irritability, mild hysteria”. The tobacco enema is no longer regarded as a sound medical treatment, but they’re still blowing smoke up our collective ass.

  19. tripletail says:

    Doing date diff math between 10.2 and 11.3, we get 33. This is just another component of the ongoing psyop. The Jews, Jesuits and Freemasons use the Gematria ciphers in absolutely everything they do. Learn to speak their language. And never get fooled again.

    • Jim S Smith says:

      It goes more than that!

      The Gematria is more of a “signing off on it” (IE: something akin to a “Kilroy was here” statement.)

      In order for one to become a Tzaddik (a “learned man”) in the old Talmudic standard, he also had to be very fluent in mathematics, and capable of many different numeric permutations and patterns.

      The very number of words, paragraphs, syllables, etc. in a “written holy work” even mattered!

      The “bible” is full of such occult symbolism and numerology. Anyone who can bring themselves to reading through it, without any emotional attachment, would see the obvious symbolism within it. (Yet, so many establishmentarian-religionists insist that there is no such symbolism, because it is the LITERAL “word of God”.)

      “Idiots to the left of me, fools to the right of me, here I am – stuck in the middle of them all!”

      – Jim S.

  20. mitch says:

    To suggest trump has covid or taking dangerous drugs is patent nonsense. Trump is a product of the deep state to divide and destroy america as planned long ago. This trump cv19 pantomime serves to convince trump supporting “cv19 deniers” the virus is real. We had a similar farce in UK when Boris Johnson supposedly got cv19 a few months back.

    • Piksil says:

      Mitch:

      How is Boris doing? And Prince Charles? Have been worried sick!

      I sent both Boris and the Prince an Edible Arrangements bouquet, as well as a small cash donation to help offset their probably huge medical bills. (I also sent Neil Ferguson edible underwear and the instructions on how to turn off location settings on his iPhone.).

      Haven’t heard from any of them, and was just wondering how they’re doing.

      ______________

      Concerned in the US

    • Jim S Smith says:

      I was beginning to think similarly.

      The whole “two-party” system is an utter sham, and it has been that way for many a year.

      Mr. Trump even helped to make this pandemic lie (and the successive hospital-deaths/murders) all the more profitable, as well as speed-up the development and delivery of dangerous (but very profitable) “vaccines” – without all the necessary testing and evaluation procedures being done.

      I’d say treason is more a course of today’s business, rather than a punishable crime anymore.

      This nation is screwed!

      The “voters” need to wake the hell up, and fast!

      – Jim S.

  21. Jim S Smith says:

    And so on,

    The globalists’ noose around the neck of humanity tightens ever further!

    Yet,

    STILL so many people are walking around everywhere, and every day – wearing those slave-masks! The stores and other businesses even have the temerity, in their “public service announcements”, to claim:

    “Wear a mask, save lives.”

    Even outdoor events, with so few people and in wide open space, are requiring everyone to wear a mask while in attendance! (And this even being in a very “conservative” state, no less.)

    I said it last year (about Oct/Nov 2019):

    “2020 will be the year America dies!”

    – Jim S

  22. Marty Gutherz says:

    i’m sure that I’m not the only one who has thought of this but I think that there’s a distinct possibility that this story about Trump being “infected” with COVID 19 is a total hoax designed to achieve 2 objectives:
    1. Trump has been bribed with offers of a huge amount of money and/or power, e.g., a promise that he will be appointed to the position of a supreme overlord in the planned neo-feudal technocracy.
    2. inciting the anti-Trump zealots to celebrate his hoped for demise, thereby gaining support for him from the undecided voters who are probably reacting adversely to the spectacle of the zealots, presumably Biden supporters, prematurely celebrating Trump’s death.
    I’m convinced that Trump, his doctors, public health advisers are all totally aware that this is a fake pandemic, that the testing is meaningless, and the Remdesevir and the anti-viral cocktail that he allegedly is taking are both ineffective and extremely toxic, so I doubt very much that he’s taking them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *